Question

COMPARE AND CONTRAST CARL ROGERS WITH ABRAHAM MASLOW. WHAT LEGACY HAS EACH OF THEM LEFT?

Answer 1

• Maslow and Rogers come from a school of thought, which is referred to as Humanistic.Carl Rogers was not only one of the founders of the Humanistic Approach, but also arguably the most influential therapist in the 20th century.Like Carl Rogers, Abraham Maslow is widely regarded as one of the founders of the Humanistic Approach. While less influential among therapists than Rogers,he still made major contributions to humanistic psychology.
• The Humanistic approach accepts the 'human qualities' of the individual; that man is born with an inherent potential for self-actualization. Maslow considers such self-actualization to be the pinnacle of human expression - the final stage of human development. The self-actualized person is 'wholly and fully human'.
• The theories of Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers both include a much emphasized concept of self actualization and the characteristics which are required in order to achieve it. Their theories in the aspect of self actualization are very similar with only a few slight variances. Both Rogers and Maslow categorize self actualization as the highest goal or driving force of the human needs system.
• Self- actualization to Maslow represents growth of an individual toward fulfilment of the highest need. Maslow defined it as ‘the process of becoming more and more what one idiosyncratically is, to become everything that one is capable of becoming’.
• Maslow suggested that individual are not doing what they were made to do, they simply cannot feel completely fulfilled, therefore making the individual feel unsettled about their future. Both Maslow and Rogers agrees that everyone is good and are able to self actualize.
• Maslow was the first to research and initiate the area of the motive to self actualization. His theory stems around the concept of ‘need’. Maslow hierarchy reflects a linear pattern of growth and are hierarchically organised. More basic needs are found at the bottom of the pyramid and the self actualization need is at the top. The bottom of the pyramid is the most important of the hierarchy in terms of survival of an individual compared to the higher level needs in order to get to the top the bottom must all be satisfied.
• At the bottom of the pyramid are the psychological (or basic) needs of a human being: breathing, food, water, sleep, sex. The next level is safety needs: security, order and stability. These two levels are highly important for the basic survival of the individual. Once this is all accomplished they can attempt more.
• The third level of need is love and belonging : once the individual has taken care of themselves they are ready to share themselves to others such as having as having family and friends. The fourth level is esteem- this is achieved when individuals feel comfortable with what they have accomplished.
• The top of the hierarchy is the self- actualization need. This is where the individual know who they are or what they want to be and have very little doubts when making decisions about their direction of life. It’s a state of harmony and understanding because their full potential has been achieved. Maslow identified these kind of individuals who have peak experiences and are highly creative.
• Maslow claimed that lower levels of needs within the hierarchy pyramid needs to be satisfied first before satisfying the higher ones. This is because the lower level needs are more powerful and urgent to achieve due to its relevancy of survival. The needs are arranged specially in order to show that an individual has to his have enough food and feel safe before attempting to earn esteem.
• Rogers had an alternative explanation to self actualization he called it the fully functioning person-“The organism has one basic tendency and striving – to actualize, maintain, and enhance the experiencing organism”.
• He believed that a fully functioning person is an individual who is already or on theory way to becoming self actualized- this occurs when a person ideal self(who they would like to be) is congruent with their actual behaviour (self-image).
• He believed that everyone could achieve their goals, wishes and desires in life and when the person has done so, self – actualization takes place. Rogers says that not everyone can self-actualize and the people that do reach to that are called fully functioning person.- the person is in touch with her and now and the individuals experiences and feelings are continually growing and changing.
• Such a person experiences in the present, with immediacy. He is able to live in his feelings and reactions of the moment. Rogers identified five charteristics of the fully functioning person:
• Open to experience-both negative and positive feelings are accepted. Negative feelings are not cast away alternatively worked through them.
• Existential living- avoids prejudging and preconceptions in situations. Being able to enjoy the current moment and not always looking back in the past or forward to the future (living for the moment).
• Trust feelings-trusting their own feelings and judgement and not seeking for anyone else for guidance. Trusting that their own decisions are the right one.
• Creativity-the ability to adjust, change and seek new experiences. Risk taking and not playing safe all the time. Have creative thinking in the person’s life.
• Fulfilled life- the person is happy and satisfied with life yet still looking for new challenges and experiences.
• Rogers suggests that people want to feel and experience and behave in ways which are consistent with their self-image which reflect what we would like to be like, ideal-self. The closer the self-image and ideal self are to each other,the more congruence would be achieved.
• Rogers believed people need to be regarded by others positively , loved and respected. Positive regards is to do with how people see them in social interactions. There are two types unconditional positive regard and conditional positive regards. Rogers believed that all infants had a need to be psotively self-regarded.
• Unconditional positive regard-this is where the parents accepts and loves the child for who they are. People who can self-actulize are more likely to have received unconditional positive regards from others, especially parents.
• Conditional positive regard- the child behaves in a way where the parents approve of. The child is not loved for who they really is only in ways where their behaviour is based upon what they feel the parents consider correct. A person who constantly seeks for approval from others is likely to have experienced conditional positive regards as a child.
• This is where Rogers and Maslow theories contrasted, Rogers believed that early childhood experiences are important for the person to achieve self actualization however Maslow did not take this into consideration and only focused primarily on achieving needs within the hierarchy.
• The two theories have a similar paths in terms of individuals following their on way to achieve self actualization and more basic needs in terms of survival needs have to be satisfied first before an individual can achieve self actualization. They both agree on being accepted can be more influential than the need for self-actulization.
• They both contrast in what they focus on after defining self actualization. Maslow focused on understanding the characteristics of a self actlizaing individuals. Rogers looked at the characteristics but also considered the ways achieve self actualization as well as developing therapy to overcome barriers that where restricting individuals from achieving their full potential.
• Overall, between the two theories of self actualization it appears to show that Rogers believes that all people can aim to become self actualized on the other hand Maslow only thinks that a small percentage can strive to that level. Rogers primarly focused on therapy to help individuals to help reach to the full pontential and Maslow agreed with this technique.
• But Rogers and Maslow left behind their own intepretations of self actualization and realizing one's potentials by focusing on positive side of human beings.