Can you prove it? But proof needs to be no more than 3 LINES. Danke schön!
Union of two ideal will be ideal if and only if one is contained is another. So any local ring will work.
Z(8)
<4>,<2> union of two ideal is <2> hence ideal
Can you prove it? But proof needs to be no more than 3 LINES. Danke schön!...
Please give detailed explanations for why you go about the proof. Thank you! 40. The Chinese Remainder Theorem for Rings. Let R be a ring and I and J be ideals in R such thatIJ-R. Show that for any r and s in R, the system of equations a. (mod I) s (mod J) has a solution. In addition, prove that any two solutions of the system are congruent modulo InJ b. c. Let I and J be ideals in...
3. If the integers mi, i = 1,..., n, are relatively prime in pairs, and a1,..., an are arbitrary integers, show that there is an integer a such that a = ai mod mi for all i, and that any two such integers are congruent modulo mi ... mn. 4. If the integers mi, i = 1,..., n, are relatively prime in pairs and m = mi...mn, show that there is a ring isomorphism between Zm and the direct product...
Complete the following natural deduction proof. The given numbered lines are the argument's premises, and the line beginning with a single slash is the argument's conclusion. Derive the argument's conclusion in a series of new lines using the proof checker below. Click Add Line to add a new line to your proof. Each new line must contain a propositional logic statement, the previous line number(s) from which the new statement follows, and the abbreviation for the rule used. As long...
Can you please provide clear and step by step solution for both 3 and 4. Thanks :) Exercise 5. [A-M Ch 3 Ex 7] Let R#0 be a ring. A multiplicatively closed subset S of R is said to be saturated if XY ES #xe S and y E S. 1. Let I be the collection of all multiplicatively closed subsets of R such that 0 € S. Show that I has maximal elements, and that Se & is maximal...
PLEASE HELP... RULES OF REPLACEMENT FOR LOGIC Complete the following natural deduction proof. The given numbered lines are the argument's premises, and the line beginning wit argument's conclusion. Derive the argument's conclusion in a series of new lines using the proof checker below. Click Add Line to a proof. Each new line must contain a propositional logic statement, the previous line number(s) from which the new statement follo abbreviation for the rule used. As long as every step is correct...
(3 + 3 = 6 pts.) Prove or disprove the following statements. If you are proving a statement, then give proper reasoning. If you are disproving a statement, then it is enough to give an example which demonstrates that the statement is false. i. If A and B are two n x n matrices, then (A + B)2 = A + 2AB + B2. ii. Let A be a nxn matrix and let I be the n x n identity...
3. Prove that strict convexity of preferences guarantees that there can not be more than one optimal choice in a standard budget set defined
3) 8 pts Find the sum Prove your claims. Be sure to explicitly state any results from the class that you use in your proof. 3) 8 pts Find the sum Prove your claims. Be sure to explicitly state any results from the class that you use in your proof.
3. Let f be a continuous function on [a, b] with f(a)0< f(b). (a) The proof of Theorem 7-1 showed that there is a smallest x in [a, bl with f(x)0. If there is more than one x in [a, b] with f(x)0, is there necessarily a second smallest? Show that there is a largest x in [a, b] with f(x) -0. (Try to give an easy proof by considering a new function closely related to f.) b) The proof...