Utilizing deductive reasoning, explain what it takes to obtain an arrest warrant and a search warrant.
this is a criminal justice
A search warrant is an order signed by a judge that authorizes police officers to search for specific objects or materials at a definite location. For example, a warrant may authorize the search and direct the police to search for and seize "cash, betting slips, record books, and every other means used in connection with placing bets on horses.
Police officers obtain search warrants by convincing a neutral and detached magistrate that they have probable cause to believe that criminal activity is occurring at the place to be searched or that evidence of a crime may be found there. Usually, the police provide the judge or magistrate with information in the form of written statements under oath, called "affidavits," which report either their own observations, or those of private citizens or police informants. If the magistrate believes that the affidavit establishes probable cause to conduct a search, he or she will issue a warrant.
The suspect, who may be connected with the place to be searched, is not present when the warrant is issued and therefore cannot contest the issue of probable cause at that time. However, the suspect can later challenge the validity of the warrant.
An arrest warrant is an official document, signed by a judge (or magistrate), which authorizes a police officer to arrest the person or people named in the warrant. Warrants typically identify the crime for which an arrest has been authorized, and may restrict the manner in which an arrest may be made. For example, a warrant may state that a suspect can be arrested "only between the hours of 6 a.m. and 6 p.m." Finally, some warrants also specify the bail that a defendant must post to regain freedom following arrest. If the warrant is for a previous failure of the suspect to appear in court—called a bench warrant—it will probably specify that the arrested person may not be released on bail at all (sometimes termed a "no-bail warrant").
Utilizing deductive reasoning, explain what it takes to obtain an arrest warrant and a search warrant....
explain the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning and why deductive reasoning is more appropriate for the positivist write not less than 500 words
1. Explain the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning in terms of why deductive reasoning is more appropriate for positivist research 2. Explain why analysing scientific research data is not just about descriptions but about explanations. 3. Discuss the experimental method in terms of its role in a positivist research exercise. 4. Discuss the purpose of the theoretical framework in terms of its function as a lens. 1. Explain the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning in terms of why...
1- What is the difference the between research approach using deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning? 2- What is the difference between qualitative research with quantitative research? 3- Describe the following terms. a) Enumerator. b) Respondent. c) Questionnaire
What is true of deductive reasoning? a. It uses specific examples to arrive at a general conclusion b. It generates conclusions using the rules of logic c. Inferences are not guaranteed to be correct, even if your reasoning is logically sound d. Both A and B e. Both B and C All of the following are TRUE about the Wason 4-card selection task, EXCEPT: a. It showcases people’s tendency to want to confirm a theory, rather than seek evidence to...
Describe deductive and inductive reasoning. What are some key differences between the two?
Explain the terms “deductive reasoning” and “decision making”, providing examples from your daily life that illustrates each of these cognitive processes. Make sure you support your discussion with information from the unit’s Readings.
4 1 point What type of deductive reasoning is this: All starships have a captain The Enterprise is a starship Therefore The Enterprise has a captain O O Categorical Syllogism Conditional Syllogism Donders Subtraction Logic Linear Syllogism
1. Describe the hallmarks of scientific research. 2. What are the steps in hypothetico‐deductive research? Explain them, using your own example. 3. Explain the processes of deduction and induction, giving an example of each. 4. Discuss the following statement: “Good research is deductive in nature.”
Explain what the duties are of the surgical technologist in case of cardiac arrest during surgery, natural disasters, and man-made disasters. nt
ent Explain what the duties are of the surgical technologist in case of cardiac arrest during surgery, natural disasters, and man-made disasters What are the signs of Malignant Hyperthermia? What is the treatment?