Question

1. Why was it alleged that the War on Drugs by Nixon was a means to wage war against Blacks and activists?
2. Do you think that this allegation is valid? Why or why not?
3. Would it then mean that if the Vietnam War had not existed, or if Nixon did not have biases against Blacks and activists, then Nixon's "War on Drugs" would not have merit?

Answer 1

As indicated by a top Nixon counselor, Nixon's objective voter base was the white network. The guide likewise says that by partner antiwar nonconformists with maryjane and blacks with heroin, it was conceivable to assault both the networks as opposed to assaulting them legitimately. It is conceivable that the charge is substantial as the rising impact of different networks, which were viewed as rivals to Nixon would compromise his position, it was important to utilize the war on drugs arrangement to quietness them.

No, the 'War on Drugs' would in any case have had merit regardless of whether Nixon didn't have inclinations against the blacks and activists as the Vietnam war was against the rising impact of socialists in South Asia and the on American soil it was against the evacuation of destructive medications, for example, heroin and sedatives.

The 'War on Drugs' can be mostly defended as by chance it was against unsafe medications, for example, heroin and developing impact of socialism. In any case, thinking about the announcement of one of Nixon's top counsel, that the war was uniquely to stifle blacks and activists alone can't be defended.

please like the answer