Why does Nietzsche criticize traditional 'objective' morality?
Friedrich Nietzsche believes that man by nature has a will to power means he wants to conquer when he gets the power which leads to two types of moral thinking. The two types of moral thinkings were the first one was the master morality, which weighs on consequences rather than the intentions behind the actions. Master morality was about value and power , whereas the slave morality is about kindness and empathy. Slave morality is based on kantiaK theory which believed that the goodness or badness of a people depends on the intentions behind his actions.
Nietzsche believes the comparison or the struggle between these two morality leads to religion and culture . He doesn't believe in traditional objective morality because he supports the nature of self instead of collective. He believes that a man crafts his identity by nature of himself instead of believing due to god's grace.
Nietzsche make a bold claim that, “Morality is just a hoax to subdue the stronger.” How does Nietzsche arrive at that conclusion?
Nietzsche make a bold claim that. "Morality is just a hoax to subdue the stronger." How does Nietzsche arrive at that conclusion?
What does Nietzsche offer us with regard to the meaning of life? 250-400 words
1. What is the goal of morality? 2. Does common morality provide a unique solution to every moral problem? If not, what does it provide?
Are morality clauses appropriate in contracts? why?
Nietzsche famously said “God is dead.” Christians believe that God, in Christ, did die (humanly speaking). What is the significance of these differing beliefs for understanding human death? In other words, why does it matter (or does it matter) to humans whether or not God is dead, or died? I'd love to hear your thoughts!
Why does dividing the focal length of the objective lens by the focal length of the eye piece lens give you the magnification of a telescope?
William Frankena says that morality requires both principles and virtues. Do you agree? Why or why not?
Kant asserts that we view the world through our own perception and that morality is objective and based on reason. The types of knowledge we can have is a priori, knowledge independent of experience, and a posteriori, knowledge we can only have after certain experiences. A priori knowledge can provide knowledge of the noumenal world, while a posteriori knowledge gives us knowledge of the phenomenal world. According to Kant, we can make theoretical or practical judgements. Theoretical judgements are concerned...
how does morality and ethical principles fit with the use of alternative interventions (CAM)?