Question

How is a corporation like a person? How are they different? Why might one argue that...

How is a corporation like a person? How are they different? Why might one argue that a corporation is a moral agent? That is to say, what moral obligations does a corporation have that are similar to those moral obligations a person has to himself and others? Finally, some argue that the only responsibility a company has is to increase its profits and nothing else. What are your thoughts on this statement and can you think of any instances where these two opposing viewpoints would clash (a company has only one responsibility {increase profits} or a company has a multitude of moral duties like a person/moral agent)? If you were the CEO of a company, which viewpoint would you favor and why?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Solution -

When a corporation is incorporated it is considered an artificial person. This is because it has a separate legal entity and has its rights and liabilities. It can enter into contracts - sale purchase assets. It can be sued and it can also sue. The differences between a person and the corporation would obviously be the human characteristics of a person that is feelings. A corporation is considered to act in a rational manner whereas a human has behavioral aspects attached. A corporation is conducted and governed by certain regulations and has its own set of vision, mission, and values similarly a person has its own morals and ethics. In a broader sense corporation is governed by many minds whereas human is governed by his or her own set of principles and laws.

A corporation can be considered a moral agent as it is a legal person and has powers to act and take decisions. Hence just as a person, an organization has visibility on the consequences of their actions and decisions. This gives them responsibility for whatever actions and decisions that the corporation has taken. A corporation just like a person has many stakeholders and there are certain legal aspects attached to the responsibility and accountability of the organization. There are certain regulations and norms under which the organization has to run. There are certain objectives that the organization has to fulfill and at the same time with the interaction of the organization with the society, it is also imperative that the organization acts in a responsible way towards the society. Thus a corporation is a moral agent just like a person and is governed by ethics.

The fact that the company has a responsibility only towards its profits is a highly misguided concept. A company has to run and thus profits are important but it is also essential to understand that the company runs in a society where there are certain norms and regulations and just like a person who lives in society follows certain ethics and values the same aspect is applied to the companies. If the company thinks only about profits then there would be scenarios where certain products can be produced in the market which will generate higher revenue for the company but are dangerous and disastrous for society. For instance, let us assume that Coca-Cola is running a plant in Africa and during production, they detect contamination which has neither changed the taste nor the color of the product but is harmful to health. So does the Coca-Cola Company go ahead with the production as there are certain profits attached to it or should they rectify the mistake which will cause at least $300,000 for rectification and they will also have to destroy the current inventory. In the whole scenario, Coca-Cola will act in the best interest of society and go ahead with the expenditure. Hence a company does not have the only goal of profits as it is the responsibility of the company to think and act in the best interest of its employees and the society. The aspect of Corporate Social Responsibility is also attached to the company, therefore, the company which is only guided by its profits is unethical.

As a CEO of the company I would go with the viewpoint that the company is a moral agent and it has a responsibility towards its employees and society because at the end of the business it is the people within the company and external to the company that supports the company in its objectives hence the company has accountability towards these stakeholders. The most profitable companies today are the ones that are aware and accountable to their stakeholders not just run on the basis of profits but also on the basis of ethical practices and their contribution towards their ecosystems.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
How is a corporation like a person? How are they different? Why might one argue that...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • PLZ USE EXAMPLES! Michelle, Elena, and the Mobile Manufacturing, Inc. (MM) board of directors know how...

    PLZ USE EXAMPLES! Michelle, Elena, and the Mobile Manufacturing, Inc. (MM) board of directors know how important it is to understand the environment in which it is operating. They hired you—a highly-regarded marketing consultant—to bring a fresh perspective to the marketing plan. You are scheduled to meet with Michelle and Elena next week to discuss the environmental conditions that are relevant to introducing the new product. As you prepare for the meeting, you consider all of the possible environmental issues....

  • Question: What does Hobbes suggest is the reason we have government at all? How does Locke’s...

    Question: What does Hobbes suggest is the reason we have government at all? How does Locke’s view of the need for government differ? Using these sources: From Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan book 1, chapter 13 So that in the nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel. First, competition; secondly, diffidence; thirdly, glory. The first maketh men invade for gain; the second, for safety; and the third, for reputation. The first use violence, to make themselves masters of other...

  • Case Study: Johnson Motor Corporation By: Theresa Ceccarelli, Ph.D. Johnson Motor Corporation operates several proving grounds...

    Case Study: Johnson Motor Corporation By: Theresa Ceccarelli, Ph.D. Johnson Motor Corporation operates several proving grounds worldwide, for development and validation testing of new vehicles. The company has a long history in the automotive industry and has a strong reputation for quality and service. Dan Smith oversees several of these sites. In one particular site in Michigan, Smith has a garage that consists of 140 full time mechanics, most of which are men. The Director, Dan Smith has been with...

  • . ******NEW ANSWER NEVER USED BEFORE**** evaluate best practices for utilizing groups and work teams in organization. Ca...

    . ******NEW ANSWER NEVER USED BEFORE**** evaluate best practices for utilizing groups and work teams in organization. Case Information: Of the billions of tons of carbon let loose into the world’s atmosphere each year, China is responsible for 21 percent, mostly due to its growth in manufacturing. And due to the billions of tons of wastewater and sewage released into rivers and lakes by Chinese chemical firms every year, 300 million of its citizens do not have clean drinking water....

  • 1. Why is growing the number of users such an important metric for social media companies?...

    1. Why is growing the number of users such an important metric for social media companies? How does Metcalfe’s Law relate to the profitability of social media companies? 2. Most social media companies rely on ad revenue as their main source of income. What are other ways that LinkedIn generates income? Why is it important for a company to have multiple ways of generating income? 3.Why do recruiters and job seekers like LinkedIn? Explain why an employer may dislike LinkedIn....

  • he Dilemma The story of Phar-Mor shows how quickly a company that built its earnings on...

    he Dilemma The story of Phar-Mor shows how quickly a company that built its earnings on fraudulent transactions can dissolve like an Alka-Seltzer. One day, Stan Cherelstein, the controller of Phar-Mor, discovered cabinets stuffed with held checks totaling $10 million. Phar-Mor couldn’t release the checks to vendors because it did not have enough cash in the bank to cover the amount. Cherelstein wondered what he should do. Background Phar-Mor was a chain of discount drugstores, based in Youngstown, Ohio, and...

  • 1) Briefly describe the evolution of management thinking highlighting the bureaucratic approach to management. 2) What...

    1) Briefly describe the evolution of management thinking highlighting the bureaucratic approach to management. 2) What kind of organization structure is reflected in this company? Discuss. 3) What attributes of the bureaucratic structure can you find in this company? 4) What management approach is practiced by the top management of the above company? Is this approach suitable for a company in the communication industry? Critically analyze. Reading Large, bureaucratic organizations have many rules and regulations. This, as well as other...

  • please solve 1-4 in detail please solve 1-3 in only 3-34. could you please tell why...

    please solve 1-4 in detail please solve 1-3 in only 3-34. could you please tell why you solved the problem like that Chapter 2 An Introduction to Cost Terms and Purposes Function Representative Cost Driver 1. Accounting 2. Human resources 3. Data processing 4. Research and development 5. Purchasing 6. Distribution 7. Billing A. Number of invoices sent B. Number of purchase orders C. Number of research scientists D. Hours of computer processing unit (CPU) E. Number of employees F...

  • 1-Apply Figure 3.1 to Patagonia to determine its view of ethics. Is it in only one...

    1-Apply Figure 3.1 to Patagonia to determine its view of ethics. Is it in only one of the quadrants, or is it in more than one? Explain. 2-Describe how Patagonia has considered the Triple Bottom Line when exercising stewardship decisions for Patagonia. 3-In which Corporate Social Responsibility perspective would you place Patagonia? Explain. 4-Apply Figure 3.8 to illustrate Patagonia’s (Chouinard’s) commitment to corporate social responsibility. 3.1 figure on ethics ARTICLE Twelve hundred Walmart buyers, a group legendary for their tough-as-nails...

  • Case study Company Case Campbell Soup Company: Watching What You Eat You might think that a well-known, veteran consumer products company like the Campbell Soup Company has it made. After all, when pe...

    Case study Company Case Campbell Soup Company: Watching What You Eat You might think that a well-known, veteran consumer products company like the Campbell Soup Company has it made. After all, when people think of soup, they think of Campbell’s. In the $5 billion U.S. soup market, Campbell dominates with a 44 percent share. Selling products under such an iconic brand name should be a snap. But if you ask Denise Morrison, CEO of Campbell, she’ll tell you a different...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT