Time after injection (hours) Temperature (0F)
24 102.8
32 104.5
48 106.5
56 107.0
Test the hypothesis that the correlation in significant at the 0.05 level.
( X) | ( Y) | X^2 | Y^2 | X*Y |
24 | 102.8 | 576 | 10567.8 | 2467.2 |
32 | 104.5 | 1024 | 10920.3 | 3344 |
48 | 106.5 | 2304 | 11342.3 | 5112 |
56 | 107 | 3136 | 11449 | 5992 |
calculation procedure for correlation
sum of (x) = ∑x = 160
sum of (y) = ∑y = 420.8
sum of (x^2)= ∑x^2 = 7040
sum of (y^2)= ∑y^2 = 44279.34
sum of (x*y)= ∑x*y = 16915.2
to caluclate value of r( x,y) = covariance ( x,y ) / sd (x) * sd
(y)
covariance ( x,y ) = [ ∑x*y - N *(∑x/N) * (∑y/N) ]/n-1
= 16915.2 - [ 4 * (160/4) * (420.8/4) ]/4- 1
= 20.8
and now to calculate r( x,y) = 20.8/ (SQRT(1/4*16915.2-(1/4*160)^2)
) * ( SQRT(1/4*16915.2-(1/4*420.8)^2)
=20.8 / (12.649*1.672)
=0.984
value of correlation is =0.984
coeffcient of determination = r^2 = 0.967
properties of correlation
1. If r = 1 Corrlation is called Perfect Positive
Corrlelation
2. If r = -1 Correlation is called Perfect Negative
Correlation
3. If r = 0 Correlation is called Zero Correlation
& with above we conclude that correlation ( r ) is = 0.9835>
0 ,perfect positive correlation
Given that,
value of r =0.984
number (n)=4
null, Ho: ρ =0
alternate, H1: ρ!=0
level of significance, α = 0.05
from standard normal table, two tailed t α/2 =4.303
since our test is two-tailed
reject Ho, if to < -4.303 OR if to > 4.303
we use test statistic (t) = r / sqrt(1-r^2/(n-2))
to=0.984/(sqrt( ( 1-0.984^2 )/(4-2) )
to =7.81
|to | =7.81
critical value
the value of |t α| at los 0.05% is 4.303
we got |to| =7.81 & | t α | =4.303
make decision
hence value of | to | > | t α| and here we reject Ho
ANSWERS
---------------
null, Ho: ρ =0
alternate, H1: ρ!=0
test statistic: 7.81
critical value: -4.303 , 4.303
decision: reject Ho
we have enough evidence to support the claim that the correlation
in significant at the 0.05 level.
55 pts The following temperatures were recorded in a rabbit at various times after being inoculated...
Based on the document below,
1. Describe the hypothesis Chaudhuri et al ids attempting to
evaluate; in other words, what is the goal of this paper? Why is he
writing it?
2. Does the data presented in the paper support the hypothesis
stated in the introduction? Explain.
3.According to Chaudhuri, what is the potential role of thew
alkaline phosphatase in the cleanup of industrial waste.
CHAUDHURI et al: KINETIC BEHAVIOUR OF CALF INTESTINAL ALP WITH PNPP 8.5, 9, 9.5, 10,...