Question

Describe similarities and differences between subjective relativism and ethical egoism. (4%)

9: Describe similarities and differences between divine command theory and Kantianism. (4%)

10: Describe similarities and differences between subjective relativism and act utilitarianism. (4%)

11: Describe similarities and differences between Kantianism and rule utilitarianism. (4%)

Answer 1

1) Similarities and differences between subjective relativism and ethical egoism.

Relativism is that the read that "the good" exists within the human mind. Our role as humans is to create "the good." Since "the good" is invented, its definition is malleable.

Objectivism is that the view that "the good" exists outside the human mind. Our role as humans is to search out or discover "the sensible." Since "the good" exists severally of our intellectual activity, its definition ne'er changes.


2) Similarities and differences between divine command theory and Kantianism.

Both divine command theory and Kantianism are objective, holding that right and wrong is expressed in rules that are true for all people in the slightest degree times in history. Divine command theory identifies the great with the desire of God, and holds that the desire of God is communicated through holy books. Kantianism, on the opposite hand, holds that we are able to use our reason to determine what's good.


3) Similarities and differences between subjective relativism and act utilitarianism.

Both subjective relativism and act utilitarianism would allow a private to evaluate a situation to work out whether or not a selected action is true or wrong. However, subjective relativism permits someone to use any suggests that to come to a decision the right factor to try and do. in line with act utilitarianism, the results of the attainable actions must evaluated. the right action is that the one that leads to the best increase in total happiness among the parties effected.

4) Similarities and differences between Kantianism and rule utilitarianism.

Both Kantianism and rule utilitarianism are objective. according to each theories, right actions are people who are in line with universal ethical rules. However, the 2 theories derive the rules in numerous ways in which. Kantianism determines whether or not a planned moral rule is appropriate by evaluating it in line with the specific Imperative. utilitarianism determines whether or not a planned ethical rule is appropriate by considering the long, overall total change in happiness that will result if everyone always followed the rule.