Think of a time when you were faced with an ethical dilemma. Using one of the ethical frameworks discussed below, describe your approach in resolving your dilemma. What was the final outcome?
*Kantian ethics suggests that decision makers have
duties or obligations with which they must follow in their
behaviors;
• virtue ethics considers that good decisions come from individuals
that possess a package of virtues (such as courage, wisdom, and
generosity for example), a virtuous individual is one that uses
multiple virtues to make decisions consistently over time, because
virtues and obligations can overlap in application, we combine
Kantian and virtue ethics in our discussion below;
• situational ethics suggests that any good decision is made out of
love or respect to someone within the context of a particular
situation;
• egoism is a framework that expects leaders to use rationality to
make decisions in line with their own longterm
self-interests;
• utilitarianism is a framework that guides leaders to promote
happiness for the largest number of people;
• behaviorism, though not initially formulated as an ethical
framework, could suggest that leaders have no choice in the
decisions that they make but, instead, are forced
to engage in certain behaviors due to the strength of particular
stimuli almost as if they were fated to do so;
• divine command theory is a more religious-oriented framework that
suggests that good decisions are those that are in line with some
direct communication from
the divine;
• natural law ethics is a framework in part derived from Catholic
teaching which, greatly simplified, could suggest that right and
wrong is the same for everyone but that people develop their
knowledge (i.e. conscience, in-
stinct) through understanding the nature of reality;
• cultural relativism is a framework that suggests that leaders
should make decisions that agree with the cultural values of the
(often geographic) area in which they
find themselves. This framework highlights that cultural values
(i.e. what is considered ethical or unethical behaviors) may not be
consistent around the world.
Utilitarianism is what I opted when I was in an ethical dilemma because this framework suggest us to think about the happiness if people who depend on and around us. When most of the people are happy then that decision will obviously not an wrong or unethical decision.
Think of a time when you were faced with an ethical dilemma. Using one of the...
what discuss can you make about medicalization and chronic disease and illness? Adult Lealth Nursing Ethics mie B. Butts OBJECTIVES After reading this chapter, the reader should be able to do the following: 1. Explore the concept of medicalization as it relates to the societal shift away from physician predominance of the 1970s. 2. Differentiate among the following terms: compliance, noncompliance, adherence, nonadherence, and concordance. 3. Examine cultural views with regard to self-determination, decision making, and American healthcare professionals' values...