A newsletter publisher believes that less than 44% of their readers own a laptop. For marketing purposes, a potential advertiser wants to confirm this claim. After performing a test at the 0.10 level of significance, the advertiser failed to reject the null hypothesis.
A newsletter publisher believes that less than 44% of their readers own a laptop. For marketing...
A newsletter publisher believes that less than 71% of their readers own a laptop. For marketing purposes, a potential advertiser wants to confirm this claim. After performing a test at the 0.05 level of significance, the advertiser decides to reject the null hypothesis. What is the conclusion regarding the publisher's claim? A. There is sufficient evidence at the 0.05 level of significance that the percentage is less than 71% B. There is not sufficient evidence at the 0.05 level of...
A newsletter publisher believes that over 52% of their readers own a Rolls Royce. For marketing purposes, a potential advertiser wants to confirm this claim. After performing a test at the 0.01 level of significance, the advertiser failed to reject the null hypothesis. What is the conclusion regarding the publisher's claim?
A newsletter publisher believes that over 43% of their readers own a Rolls Royce. For marketing purposes, a potential advertiser wants to confirm this claim. After performing a test at the 0.02 level of significance, the advertiser failed to reject the null hypothesis. What is the conclusion regarding the publisher's claim? Kevad
A newsletter publisher believes that over 29% of their readers own a personal computer. For marketing purposes, a potential advertiser wants to confirm this claim. After performing a test at the 0.02 level of significance, the advertiser failed to reject the null hypothesis. What is the conclusion regarding the publisher's claim? A. There is not sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level of significance to say that the percentage is over 29%. B. There is sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level of significance...
A newsletter publisher believes that over 38% of their readers own a Rolls Royce. For marketing purposes, a potential advertiser wants to confirm this claim. After performing a test at the 0.05 level of significance, the advertiser decides to reject the null hypothesis. What is the conclusion regarding the publisher's claim? A. There is sufficient evidence at the .05 level that the percentage is over 38% B. We cannot tell since we are not given the sample size C. There...
A newsletter publisher believes that over 47% of their readers own a Rolls Royce. For marketing purposes, a potential advertiser wants to confirm this claim. After performing a test at the 0.01 level of significance, the advertiser failed to reject the null hypothesis.What is the conclusion regarding the publisher's claim?
A publisher reports that 44% of their readers own a laptop. A marketing executive wants to test the claim that the percentage is actually over the reported percentage. A random sample of 100 found that 48 % of the readers owned a laptop. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to support the executive's claim? Step 1 of 7: State the null and alternative hypotheses. Answer Point Tables Keypad Keyboard Shortcuts < Ho I Ne Prev H A publisher...
A newsletter publisher believes that less than 65 % of their readers own a laptop. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to substantiate the publisher's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario. Keypad Answer 6 Points Ho Ha
publisher reports that 38% of their readers own a laptop. A marketing executive wants to test the claim that the percentage is actually above the reported percentage. A random sample of 400 found that 44% of the readers owned a laptop. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.05 level to support the executive's claim? Step 1 of 7: State the null and alternative hypotheses. Step 2 of 7: Find the value of the test statistic. Round your answer to two...
A newsletter publisher believes that less than 56% of their readers own a Rolls Royce. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.02 level to substantiate the publisher's claim? State the null and alternative hypotheses for the above scenario.