Question

Naomi Zack argues that race is a social construct and is dangerous. What does she mean...

Naomi Zack argues that race is a social construct and is dangerous. What does she mean by race being “socially constructed?” How does she argue in favor of it? Does she think this realization means that we should not think or speak of race anymore? a written essay 4 pages, double spaces.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

   Naomi Zack who is an eminent professor of philosophy at Lehman College at New Work. She defined Race is the acquired hereditable differences in human groups which evolve in geographical isolation. According to her race is socially contructed because it came into existence through colonialism and global development which had an impact on poor nonwhite population. So from here we can see that race is being created by the people of society.

Zack in order to explain about the concept of "Race as a social construct" she developed a concept of anti-racism as a new paradigm. It generally driven our attention tpwards racial oppression and other forms of current injustice. This racial differentiation are different categories of human recognizable by way of morphological and other genetically transmitted traits such as skin color and this became the question for justice. She distinguishes two ways of philosophizing about justice. One treat justice as an ideal that can be defined and reasoned about even if no real society in human history ever. The other approach begins with injustice and seeks to understand and correct it. So it imples that the philosopher has some conception about justice, but Zack contends that theories of justice also starts from preexisting beliefs. From these viwes it has been proved that priviledge whites are said to have a right belonging to both whites and nonwhites that is violated when some nonwhites are the ones who exercises it.

Zack denies the existence of deep persisting and tenacious racial inequality, expressed and reinforced through rotine practices of violence and humiliation by oppressor which held accountable for their actions. She also said race is by virtue of the one drop rule, mandate rules of racial taxonomies that maintain white supremacy. She contends this is accomplished by authorization of a racial asymmetrical paradigm that maintain "racial purity" that excludes blacks and subsequently a group that remains virtually ignored within etno-racial theory. So it is dangerous.

Race is a social construction that reflects history, politics, and sharedsocial tradition among dominant and subordinate human groups each of which sharesinterlocking, intergenerational lines of familes descent

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Naomi Zack argues that race is a social construct and is dangerous. What does she mean...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Question: What does Hobbes suggest is the reason we have government at all? How does Locke’s...

    Question: What does Hobbes suggest is the reason we have government at all? How does Locke’s view of the need for government differ? Using these sources: From Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan book 1, chapter 13 So that in the nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel. First, competition; secondly, diffidence; thirdly, glory. The first maketh men invade for gain; the second, for safety; and the third, for reputation. The first use violence, to make themselves masters of other...

  • What are your top 3 takaways from this article? It’s always tempting to see the present...

    What are your top 3 takaways from this article? It’s always tempting to see the present moment as the peak of chaos and disruption, whether we’re talking about politics or just how those teenagers behave today. The same is true in marketing, because in many ways that profession is always in a state of chaos and disruption. But I don’t think it’s hyperbole to apply “peak chaos and disruption” to social media marketing in the first quarter of 2018. Let’s...

  • Hi there! I need to compare two essay into 1 essay, and make it interesting and...

    Hi there! I need to compare two essay into 1 essay, and make it interesting and choose couple topics which im going to talk about in my essay FIRST ESSAY “Teaching New Worlds/New Words” bell hooks Like desire, language disrupts, refuses to be contained within boundaries. It speaks itself against our will, in words and thoughts that intrude, even violate the most private spaces of mind and body. It was in my first year of college that I read Adrienne...

  • Read “Instituionalizing our Demise: America vs Multiculturalism” by Roger Kimball on pg 268 and “Reinventing America”...

    Read “Instituionalizing our Demise: America vs Multiculturalism” by Roger Kimball on pg 268 and “Reinventing America” Call for a new national indentity” by Elizabeth Martinez on pg 275. Create a double entry notebook for each reading selection It should be atleast five observation and responses. wric 268 PART 2 essay pro. exactly how and why their authors disagree. Instead of with parties in conflict as mediators do, you will nt of view designed to appeal to both sides, mediatn posing...

  • Using the book, write another paragraph or two: write 170 words: Q: Compare the assumptions of...

    Using the book, write another paragraph or two: write 170 words: Q: Compare the assumptions of physician-centered and collaborative communication. How is the caregiver’s role different in each model? How is the patient’s role different? Answer: Physical-centered communication involves the specialists taking control of the conversation. They decide on the topics of discussion and when to end the process. The patient responds to the issues raised by the caregiver and acts accordingly. On the other hand, Collaborative communication involves a...

  • Evaluate the arical writ the response in which you state your agreement or disagreement with writer...

    Evaluate the arical writ the response in which you state your agreement or disagreement with writer up un these questions guidelines 1) can empathy lead us astrary? how 2) our heart will always go out to the baby in the well, its a measure of our humanity. but empathy will have to yield to reason if humanity is to have a future can empathy yield to reason? how? thank you The Baby in the Well: The Case against Empathy* -Paul...

  • Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are...

    Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are inseparable. For B-Money, the two predictably merged when he was negotiat- ing a deal for his tracks. At other times, the merger is unpredictable, like when your business faces an unexpected auto accident, product recall, or government regulation change. In either type of situation, when business owners know the law, they can better protect themselves and sometimes even avoid the problems completely. This chapter...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT