Question

Analyze whether Jimmy's Title VII religious discrimination suit against Simmons Corp. should be dismissed, using the...

Analyze whether Jimmy's Title VII religious discrimination suit against Simmons Corp. should be dismissed, using the McDonnell Douglas test. See this document for a summary of the test.

The McDonnell-Douglas Test for Intentional Discrimination Claims

  • (1) Plaintiff must make a prima facie case of discrimination

Prima facie case has 4 parts, all of which must be met by plaintiff:

  • (1) Plaintiff is member of protected class
  • (2) Plaintiff is qualified for the job in question
  • (3) Plaintiff suffered an adverse employment action
  • (4) Persons who are not members of the protected class did not suffer the adverse employment action
  • (2) If plaintiff makes the prima facie case, employer must respond by articulating a legitimate non-discriminatory reason for the action it took against the plaintiff
  • (3) If employer gives such a reason, the plaintiff must present evidence that indicates the reason is a pretext—not the truth.

If there’s evidence of pretext, then the conclusion is that the employer’s intent was to discriminate against the plaintiff, and plaintiff’s case should not be dismissed. If plaintiff fails to present such evidence, the case must be dismissed.

Due to financial problems, Simmons Corp. instructs its division heads to cut costs within their divisions. Brett, the head of the sales division, fires Jimmy after receiving this directive. Jimmy is Jewish. Brett does not fire anyone else from the sales division, and Jimmy was the only Jewish employee in the division.

Brett says that he discharged Jimmy because of the directive to cut costs. Brett explains that Jimmy had the highest salary among all employees in the division, and therefore firing him saved more money than laying off a lower-paid employee.

Jimmy says that he had more seniority at the company than anyone else employed in the sales division. He has documents showing that on all past occasions (10 times) when Brett had to cut costs, he had laid off the division employees who had the lowest seniority within the company.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

The case against Simmons Corp cannot be dismissed using the McDonnell DOuglas Test.

Reason:

1.The plaintiff (Jimmy) is a member of protected class (jews).

2.Jimmy is qualified for the job in question as he claims that he has more seniority than anyone else employed in the sales division.

3.Plaintiff was fired from the job.

4. There was no other Jewish in the division and no one else was fired.

5.Jimmy has evidence showing that on all past occasions division employees with lowest seniority was fired first.

Hence the case against Simons corp is legitimate.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Analyze whether Jimmy's Title VII religious discrimination suit against Simmons Corp. should be dismissed, using the...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • I would like some help rewording this IRAC analysis.. Issue: The issue at hand with this...

    I would like some help rewording this IRAC analysis.. Issue: The issue at hand with this case is whether or not the Court of Appeals properly reversed the dismissal of the plaintiff employees 703(a)(1) claim. Rule: The complainant in a trial under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 carries the initial burden under the statute of establishing a prima facie case of racial discrimination. This may be done by showing (i) that he belongs to a racial...

  • One of the most important Title VII civil rights cases is McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,...

    One of the most important Title VII civil rights cases is McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973).  This case basically established what the burden of proof must be in order for someone to prove discrimination. Like most lawsuits, this case started out with a disgruntled employee, Percy Green. Mr. Green claimed that his employer, McDonnel-Douglas, had discriminated against him based on his race. This assignment will take you through the long legal history of this case. Don’t worry...

  • A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge...

    A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge award significant damages for the mere fact of an employee's dismissal, or for the stigma that that dismissal brings? Or for the employer thereafter competing with the ex-employee for the clients, before the ex-employee has got a new job? B. Basic Facts [2] This is an appeal from 2009 ABQB 591 (CanLII), 473 A.R. 254. [3] Usually a judgment recites facts before law. But...

  • I need Summary of this Paper i dont need long summary i need What methodology they used , what is the purpose of this p...

    I need Summary of this Paper i dont need long summary i need What methodology they used , what is the purpose of this paper and some conclusions and contributes of this paper. I need this for my Finishing Project so i need this ASAP please ( IN 1-2-3 HOURS PLEASE !!!) Budgetary Policy and Economic Growth Errol D'Souza The share of capital expenditures in government expenditures has been slipping and the tax reforms have not yet improved the income...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT