- Scan Question
- + Post
- Get Coins
Conflict resolution can be defined as the informal or formal process that two or more parties use to find a peaceful solution to their dispute.
A number of common cognitive and emotional traps, many of them unconscious, can exacerbate conflict and contribute to the need for conflict resolution:
• Self-serving fairness interpretations. Rather than deciding what’s fair from a position of neutrality, we interpret what would be most fair to us, then justify this preference on the bases of fairness. For example, department heads are likely to each think they deserve the lion’s share of the annual budget. Disagreements about what’s fairlead to clashes.
• Overconfidence. We tend to be overconfident in our judgments, a tendency that leads us to unrealistic expectations. Disputants are likely to be overconfident about their odds of winning a lawsuit, for instance, an error that can lead them to shun a negotiated settlement that would save them time and money.
• Escalation of commitment. Whether negotiators are dealing with a labor strike, a merger, or an argument with a colleague, they are likely to irrationally escalate their commitment to their chosen course of action, long after it has proven useful. We desperately try to recoup our past investments in a dispute (such as money spent on legal fees), failing to recognize that such “sunk costs” should play no role in our decisions about the future.
• Conflict avoidance. Because negative emotions cause us discomfort and distress, we may try to tamp them down, hoping that our feelings will dissipate with time. In fact, conflict tends to become more entrenched, and parties have a greater need for conflict resolution when they avoid dealing with their strong emotions.
Given these and other pitfalls, how can you set up a constructive conflict resolution process when dealing with conflict at work and other realms? Conflicts can be resolved in a variety of ways, including negotiation, mediation, arbitration, and litigation.
• Negotiation. In conflict resolution, you can and should draw on the same principles of collaborative negotiation that you use in dealmaking. For example, you should aim to explore the interests underlying parties’ positions, such as a desire to resolve a dispute without attracting negative publicity or to repair a damaged business relationship. In addition, determine your best alternative to a negotiated agreement, or BATNA—what you will do if you fail to reach an agreement, such as finding a new partner or filing a lawsuit. By brainstorming options and looking for tradeoffs across issues, you may be able to negotiate a satisfactory outcome to your dispute without the aid of outside parties.
• Mediation. In mediation, disputants enlist a trained, neutral third party to help them come to a consensus. Rather than imposing a solution, a professional mediator encourages disputants to explore the interests underlying their positions. Working with parties both together and separately, mediators seek to help them discover a resolution that is sustainable, voluntary, and nonbinding.
• Arbitration. In arbitration, which can resemble a court trial, a neutral third party serves as a judge who makes decisions to end the dispute. The arbitrator listens to the arguments and evidence presented by each side, then renders a binding and often confidential decision. Although disputants typically cannot appeal an arbitrator’s decision, they can negotiate most aspects of the arbitration process, including whether lawyers will be present and which standards of evidence will be used.
• Litigation. In civil litigation, a defendant and a plaintiff face off before either a judge or a judge and jury, who weigh the evidence and make a ruling. Information presented in hearings and trials usually enters the public record. Lawyers typically dominate litigation, which often ends in a negotiated settlement during the pretrial period.
In general, it makes sense to start off less-expensive, less-formal conflict resolution procedures, such as negotiation and mediation, before making the larger commitments of money and time that arbitration and litigation often demand. Conflict-resolution training can further enhance your ability to negotiate satisfactory resolutions to your disputes.
Is there a correct way to handle conflict? What are the effects
of poor conflict management? Conflict in the workplace might be
inevitable, as employees have different personalities, goals, and
opinions. Conflict management is one of the core trainings we offer
for managers and supervisors. Learning how to handle conflict
efficiently is a necessary skill for anyone in management and the
key to preventing it from hindering employees' professional growth.
Conflict resolution is only a five-step process:
Step 1: Identify the source of the conflict. The more information you have about the cause of the conflict, the more easily you can help to resolve it. To get the information you need, use a series of questions to identify the cause, like, “When did you feel upset?” “Do you see a relationship between that and this incident?” “How did this incident begin?”
As a manager or supervisor, you need to give both parties the chance to share their side of the story. It will give you a better understanding of the situation, as well as demonstrate your impartiality. As you listen to each disputant, say, “I see” or “uh huh” to acknowledge the information and encourage them to continue to open up to you.
Step 2: Look beyond the incident. Often, it is not the situation but the perspective on the situation that causes anger to fester and ultimately leads to a shouting match or other visible—and disruptive—evidence of a conflict.
The source of the conflict might be a minor problem that occurred months before, but the level of stress has grown to the point where the two parties have begun attacking each other personally instead of addressing the real problem. In the calm of your office, you can get them to look beyond the triggering incident to see the real cause. Once again, probing questions will help, like, “What do you think happened here?” or “When do you think the problem between you first arose?”
Step 3: Request solutions. After getting each
party’s viewpoint on the conflict, the next step is to get each to
identify how the situation could be changed. Again, question the
parties to solicit their ideas: “How can you make things better
As mediator, you have to be an active listener, aware of every verbal nuance, as well as a good reader of body language.
Just listen. You want to get the disputants to stop fighting and start cooperating, and that means steering the discussion away from finger pointing and toward ways of resolving the conflict.
Step 4: Identify solutions both disputants can support. You are listening for the most acceptable course of action. Point out the merits of various ideas, not only from each other’s perspective, but in terms of the benefits to the organization. (For instance, you might point to the need for greater cooperation and collaboration to effectively address team issues and departmental problems.)
Step 5: Agreement. The mediator needs to get the two parties to shake hands and agree to one of the alternatives identified in Step 4. Some mediators go as far as to write up a contract in which actions and time frames are specified. However, it might be sufficient to meet with the individuals and have them answer these questions: “What action plans will you both put in place to prevent conflicts from arising in the future?” and “What will you do if problems arise in the future?”
This assignment requires you to research online library to search for a peer-reviewed article which must...
Understanding Health Literacy Interventions Using the Online Library, select two articles from peer-reviewed journals that discuss programs with an aim to improve or address health literacy. Based on your research, create a 2- to 3-page report in a Microsoft Word document, including answers to the following questions: Who was the target population(s)? How did the target population identify this population as needing the health literacy intervention? How was the intervention carried out in each article? What were the outcomes of...
Use the DeVry-Keller Online Library to find a research article (no older than 2009) related to the Patient Protection and Affordability Act. Use this opportunity to discuss physician practice behaviors related to managed healthcare and the future of managed care under healthcare reform. Your written paper should be 750 words, double-spaced, and in APA style. At least three references are required for this assignment. Our primary text and the journal or website research article must be used as references to...
Do an OCLS search to retrieve one source of a peer-reviewed article on controlled vocabulary in healthcare. Navigate to the threaded discussion below and respond to the following questions: Data, information, and knowledge resources are sometimes characterized by describing their inputs and outputs. Pick one resource with which you are familiar and describe its inputs and outputs. Describe requirements for a controlled vocabulary to classify the inputs and outputs.
Either view a video or find a peer-reviewed article on two distinct subject matters relevant to Operations Management. After viewing the video or reading the article, you are to write a reflection on the article/video. Be sure to include, at a minimum, the following: 1. A summary of the article/video 2. What you learned from the article/video 3. How you believe that the subject matter can be best used in today's business environment Each video/article reflection should be between 500-700...
For this assignment, you will need to do a little research on one manufactured food product that you frequently eat. Once you've chosen, you will: Identify the ingredients of the food product. Then pick one ingredient from the list to define. You will need to use either Google Scholar or the library database to find at least two peer-reviewed research articles that identify how this particular ingredient may or may not benefit your health.
1. Investigate one of the following topics for your original posting. Reference one peer-reviewed journal article (not your textbook) in APA format to support your submission. Posting must be a minimum of 200 words. a. Victoria's story about her son Tyler - (check online) b. Emily's story - (see the Emily Jerry Foundation online) c. Michael Villeneuve medication error - (check online) d. Josie King - (check online) e. Texas Whistleblower case with registered nurses Anne Mitchell and Vickilyn Galle...
For this written assignment, select one recent (within the last two years) evidence-based article from a peer reviewed nursing journal that describes a "best practice" in an area of nursing you are interested in. For example, if you would like to be a pediatric nurse, select an article that discusses a best practice in pediatric care. Cite the article and provide a brief overview of how the results or findings were obtained. Then describe the "best practice." Conclude your discussion...
My topic: Stress and Health Before you can actually write a job analysis report, you must first conduct research and find credible sources. You will want to consult scholarly peer-review journal articles. Specifically, your Portfolio Project essay requires you to analyze and reflect on other psychological issues that pertain to your projected career path, including leadership qualities, stressors and coping mechanisms, and networking opportunities. You will conduct independent research in the Virtual Library to help you complete Part 2 of...
Assignment: This is an individual assignment. For this assignment you will research online an instance of when an engineer violated a law or regulation and was prosecuted in criminal court (not civil court) or plead guilty to a criminal charge. Please provide references. In the written assignment, please include a brief summary of the event and answer the following questions: Charged! • What is the engineer being charged with? • What the engineer did or did not do properly in...
Choose one topic from the list below and conduct an Internet search for 3-4 peer reviewed articles. Lean Systems (lean manufacturing) Agile Systems Total Quality Management Six Sigma Statistical Process Control In a 2-3 page paper (excluding cover and reference pages), explain the following: What is the main focus of the chosen topic? Where did the concept originate from? What types of organizations are utilizing the concepts? What are the biggest benefits from firms adopting the concepts? What types of...