Problem # 3 (Notes Receivable with Unrealistic Interest Rate) On December 31, 2015, Tran Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayden Co. Hayden was short of cash, and Tran Co. agreed to accept a $100,000 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayden is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 15%. Tran is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 8%.
Instructions
1. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2015, for Tran Co.
2. Assuming Tran Co.’s fiscal year-end is December 31, prepare the journal entry for December 31, 2016.
3. Assuming Tran Co.’s fiscal year-end is December 31, prepare the journal entry for December 31, 2017.
ANSWER:
(1) Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2015, for Tran Co.
DATE | ACCOUNT TITLES | DEBIT | CREDIT |
Dec. 31, 2015 | Notes Receivable | 100,000 | |
Discount on Notes Receivable | 24,386 | ||
Consulting Revenue | 75,614 |
Present value of Notes Receivable = $100,000 / 1.15 ^ 2
Present value of Notes Receivable = $75,614
(2) Assuming Tran Co.’s fiscal year-end is December 31, prepare the journal entry for December 31, 2016.
DATE | ACCOUNT TITLES | DEBIT | CREDIT |
Dec. 31, 2016 | Discount on Notes Receivable | 11,342 | |
Interest Revenue | 11,342 |
Interest Revenue = $75.614 * 15%
Interest Revenue = $11,342
(3) Assuming Tran Co.’s fiscal year-end is December 31, prepare the journal entry for December 31, 2017.
DATE | ACCOUNT TITLES | DEBIT | CREDIT |
Dec. 31, 2017 | Discount on Notes Receivable | 13,044 | |
Interest Revenue | 13,044 | ||
Dec. 31, 2017 | Cash | 100,000 | |
Notes Receivable | 100,000 |
Interest Revenue = ( $75.614 + $11,342 ) * 15%
Interest Revenue = $13,043
Problem # 3 (Notes Receivable with Unrealistic Interest Rate) On December 31, 2015, Tran Co. performed...
On December 31, 2015, Tamarisk Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Tamarisk Co. agreed to accept a $262,700 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Tamarisk is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Assuming Tamarisk Co.’s fiscal year-end is December 31, prepare the journal entry for December 31,...
On December 31, 2015, Tamarisk Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Tamarisk Co. agreed to accept a $262,700 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Tamarisk is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Assuming Tamarisk Co.’s fiscal year-end is December 31, prepare the journal entry for December 31,...
On December 31, 2015, Riverbed Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Riverbed Co. agreed to accept a $298,600 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 10%. Riverbed is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. A) Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2015, for the...
that took place on July 1, 2019 E7.14 (L04) Notes Receivable with Unrealistic Interest Rate) On December 31, 2019, Hurly Co. performed environmental consulting services for Cascade Co. Cascade was short of cash, and Hurly Co. agreed to accept a $300,000 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2021, as pay ment in full. Cascade is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 10%. Hurly is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at...
On December 31, 2015, Culver Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Culver Co. agreed to accept a $318,100 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Culver is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 5%. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2015, for the Culver...
On December 31, 2015, Swifty Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Swifty Co. agreed to accept a $293,800 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Swifty is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2015, for the Swifty...
On December 31, 2020, Blue Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Blue Co. agreed to accept a $322,700 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2022, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 10%. Blue is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2020, for the Blue...
On December 31, 2020, Blue Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Blue Co. agreed to accept a $322,700 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2022, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 10%. Blue is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2020, for the Blue...
?On December 31, 2015, Bonita Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Bonita Co. agreed to accept a $346,500 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Bonita is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%.
Exercise 7-14 On December 31, 2015, Shamrock Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Shamrock Co. agreed to accept a $324,900 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Shamrock is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2015, for...