Question:Why are clades “supported” by one or more
synapomorphy? We expect the synapomorphy to be present...
Question
Why are clades “supported” by one or more
synapomorphy? We expect the synapomorphy to be present...
Why are clades “supported” by one or more
synapomorphy? We expect the synapomorphy to be present in all the
members of the clade defined by the trait – but the character might
be highly modified, or present only a brief developmental stage.
[Sometimes the trait is lost altogether, a situation we call being
“secondarily lost”]
What kinds of traits are used to construct
phylogenies? What is the key feature of a trait that may be used to
construct a phylogeny?
Remember the examples for applications of phylogenic analyses:
HIV forensics case, swordfish evolution.
Make sure you are very comfortable with these terms:
monophyletic, polyphyletic, paraphyletic. Which is used for the
construction of phylogenetic trees, and why? Why are the others
still used in various applications?
Understanding the physical origins and dynamics of
Earth helps us understand the origin of life and show how life also
influences the makeup of the physical environment. Be able to
explain the key features of each eon/period on the diagram on this
page: Hadean, Archaean, Proterozoic, Phanerozoic. What does the
Precambrian refer to?
Synapomorphies are (morphological, molecular, or behavioral)
characters shared by a group of taxa due to their inheritance from
a common ancestor.
Synapomorphies thus constitute evidence for historical
relationships and their associated hierarchical structure.
For example, the cladogram
Cladograms, phylogenetic trees that depict evolutionary
relationships among a set of taxa, are one of the most powerful
predictive tools in modern biology. They are
usually depicted in one of two formats—tree or ladder. Previous
research (Novick and Catley 2007) has found that college students
have much greater difficulty understanding a cladogram’s
hierarchical structure when it is depicted in the ladder
format.
Such understanding would seem to be a prerequisite for
successful tree thinking.
The present research examined the effect of a theoretically
guided manipulation—adding a synapomorphy on each branch that
supports two or more taxa—on students’ understanding of the
hierarchical structure of ladder cladograms.
Synapomorphies are characters shared by a group of taxa due to
inheritance from a common ancestor.
Thus, their depiction on a cladogram may facilitate the
understanding of evolutionary relationships.
Students’ comprehension was assessed in terms of success at
translating relationships depicted in the ladder format to the tree
format. T
results indicated that adding synapomorphies provided powerful
conceptual scaffolding that improved comprehension for students
with both weaker and stronger backgrounds in biology.
For stronger background students, the benefit of adding
synapomorphies to the ladders was comparable to that of
approximately two hours of instruction in phylogenetics that
emphasized the ladder format.
Cladograms are phylogenetic trees that depict evolutionary
relationships among a set of taxa in terms of nested levels of
common ancestry.
Synapomorphies are (morphological, molecular, or behavioral)
characters shared by a group of taxa due to their inheritance from
a common ancestor.
Synapomorphies thus constitute evidence for historical
relationships and their associated hierarchical structure.
For example, the cladogram in shows the evolutionary
relationships, supported by synapomorphies, among genera of
Mollusca.
Cladograms are one of the most powerful predictive tools in
modern biology. U
monophyly—groupings comprising all descendent taxa and their
most recent common ancestor (a.k.a. clades)—to organize and make
sense of the 3.5 billion year history of life on Earth, they
provide a conceptual framework for basic and applied biology in
fields as disparate as conservation, ecology, behavior, molecular
biology, epidemiology, and pharmacology .G
the importance of cladograms in biology, it is not surprising
that a number of researchers and educators have called for the
inclusion of tree thinking in biology curricula for both biology
majors and nonmajors, as well as at the high school level.
2):
Tobuild a phylogenetic tree such as the one to the right,
biologists collect data about the characters of each organism they
are interested in.
Characters are heritable traits that can be compared across
organisms, such as physical characteristics (morphology), genetic
sequences, and behavioral traits.
Phylogenetic trees represent hypotheses about the evolutionary
relationships among a group of organisms.
A phylogenetic tree may be built using morphological (body
shape), biochemical, behavioral, or molecular features of species
or other groups.
In building a tree, we organize species into nested groups
based on shared derived traits (traits different from those of the
group's ancestor).
The sequences of genes or proteins can be compared among
species and used to build phylogenetic trees.
Closely related species typically have few sequence
differences, while less related species tend to have more.
Please Rate My Answer...... Thank......u...
NOTE:As per Chegg rules i have to 1 or 2 questions
only...