Question

Is Goldicks negligent conduct committed within the scope of his employment for Lapp Roofing liable

Is Goldicks negligent conduct committed within the scope of his employment for Lapp Roofing liable

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Keating vs Goldlick & Lapp Roofing Metal Company.

Case: Lapp Roofing Metal company was a construction company provide services outside Ohio.Goldlick an employee was sent to Delaware for work purpose and permitted to take company owned van for transportation purpose as he was trusted employee. Later Goldlick got drunk and drove van and this lead to an accident in which one man named Keating and others got injured.

Injured party brought suit against Lapp roofing.

Lapp roofing in their defence stated that it was not in the course of employment so they as an employer will not be liable for the act of Goldlick.

Court of law found that the act was due to negligent act of Goldlick himself and was not in the course of employment. Lapp roofing granted the summary judgement.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Is Goldicks negligent conduct committed within the scope of his employment for Lapp Roofing liable
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Why are principals liable for the torts committed by agents when they are acting within the...

    Why are principals liable for the torts committed by agents when they are acting within the scope of their employment? Provide an example

  • Discussion 05.2 Sexual Assault Argue that the nurse acted within the course and scope of employment and that the plainti...

    Discussion 05.2 Sexual Assault Argue that the nurse acted within the course and scope of employment and that the plaintiff should win.

  • CASE BRIEF 16.4 Lange v. National Biscuit Company 211 N.W.2d 783 (Minn. 1973) FACTS: Ronnell Lynch...

    CASE BRIEF 16.4 Lange v. National Biscuit Company 211 N.W.2d 783 (Minn. 1973) FACTS: Ronnell Lynch was a cookie salesman for Nabisco. Jerome Lange was the manager of a small grocery story on Lynch’s route. Nabisco had received complaints about Lynch being overly aggressive in taking shelf space. On May 1, 1969, while Lynch was delivering merchandise to Lange’s store, Lynch and Lange became involved in an argument and Lynch assaulted Lange and threw merchandise around the store. Lange sued...

  • Jerry is a delivery person for Pretty Flowers Florists. His primary job responsibility is to deliver...

    Jerry is a delivery person for Pretty Flowers Florists. His primary job responsibility is to deliver floral arrangements in the company’s van. While driving a floral arrangement to a wedding, Jerry decides to stop at the local tavern and have a beer. After several drinks, he gets back into the van with the intention of going home for a quick nap. Instead, he gets into an accident when he illegally goes through a red light. The drivers of the other...

  • 50.Garnishment a.allows a creditor to collect a debt by taking property of the debtor’s being held...

    50.Garnishment a.allows a creditor to collect a debt by taking property of the debtor’s being held by a third party. b.first requires a writ of attachment. c.first requires a writ of execution. d.first requires a foreclosure proceeding. 7.An undisclosed principal a.is bound to any contract made by his/her agent with a third party. b.has no liability. c.is liable under the UCC if a reasonable person under similar circumstances would find him or her liable. d.may be subject to punitive damages...

  • TRUE OR FALSE: 1. Harry is drunk and driving his car 15 miles over the speed...

    TRUE OR FALSE: 1. Harry is drunk and driving his car 15 miles over the speed limit. He hits Angelina who is crossing the street on foot against a red light (Harry has the right of way). Angelina has over $100,000 in medical bills and has significant pain and suffering. If Angelina sues in a state that follows the theory of contributory negligence, she will get nothing. 2. A person cannot be guilty of negligence if they have no duty...

  • Freddie owns a pizza parlor. The pizza parlor has both dine-in and dellivery service. Tommy is...

    Freddie owns a pizza parlor. The pizza parlor has both dine-in and dellivery service. Tommy is Freddie's employee, and his job duties include delivering pizza. On one of his pizza deliveries. Tommy is not paying attention and runs a stop sign striking and severely injuring Jose. Which of the following best describes Tommys liability for Jose's O Tommy has no liability for Jose's damages because he is operating as an employee of Freddie. O Tommy is fully liable for Jose's...

  • Freddie owns a pizza parlor. The pizza parlor has both dine-in and dellivery service. Tommy is...

    Freddie owns a pizza parlor. The pizza parlor has both dine-in and dellivery service. Tommy is Freddie's employee, and his job duties include delivering pizza. On one of his pizza deliveries. Tommy is not paying attention and runs a stop sign striking and severely injuring Jose. Which of the following best describes Tommys liability for Jose's O Tommy is fully liable for Jose's damages O Tommy has no liability for Jose's damages because he was not within the course and...

  • A 20 year old college student presents to his primary care physician for a pre-employment physica...

    A 20 year old college student presents to his primary care physician for a pre-employment physical examination. His physical exam is within normal limits. Blood samples for CBC with diff, PT/INR, PTT and CMP are collected and sent to Quest for testing. His results reveal: CBC with diff: WBC: 6.3 Band neutrophils: 65 RBC: 4.40 Segmented neutrophils: 5 Hgb: 14.0 Lymphocytes: 30 Hct: 42.1 Monocytes: 1 MCV: 95.6 Eosinophils: MCH: 31.8 Basophils: MCHC: 33.2 Metamyelocytes: 4 RDW: 12.9 Myelocytes: PLT:...

  • Q1: The loss prevention ocer at a Home Depot store suspects that a customer has slipped...

    Q1: The loss prevention ocer at a Home Depot store suspects that a customer has slipped a small power tool into the inside pocket of his trench coats. Over the shopper’s protests, the ocer gently takes the shopper’s arm and leads him to the loss prevention oce until the police can arrive. Within minutes, the police arrive, search the suspect, and don’t nd anything. Which statement best describes the liability of the loss prevention ocer and Home Depot. They are...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT