Question

1. On the one hand, what harms are potentially produced by failing to take action to control climate change? On the other hand, what harms are potentially produced by acting to lower carbon emissions?

2. To what extent do humans have a moral responsibility to future generations that are yet to be born? Explain your reasoning.

3. Arguably, actions to cut carbon emissions and curb global warming right now have real costs for certain segments of the global 4. If you were in a position to recommend environmental policy changes or actions, what would you advocate and why?population while the benefits of such actions are more abstract. How should we balance the tangible costs in the present and abstract consequences in the future when addressing climate change? Explain.

5. Do prosperous countries have a greater responsibility to take action and bear more of the costs of controlling climate change than developing countries? Explain your reasoning.

6. Considering that the negative impacts of climate change will likely fall disproportionally on the poor, yet developing countries must often increase consumption and emissions to achieve greater economic growth, do you think developing nations should be exempt from actions to control climate change? Why or why not?

7. The climate change agreement approved in Paris is based on voluntary goals and pledges by participating countries. Would it be ethically permissible to impose carbon emission goals on countries and individuals and enforce them with penalties? Explain your reasoning.

8. Should individuals, organizations, cities and states stay activity involved in climate change prevention even though President Trump pulled out of the Paris agreement? Can one group or even one person make a difference?

Answer 1

1.On the one hand, what harms are potentially produced by failing to take action to control climate change? On the other hand, what harms are potentially produced by acting to lower carbon emissions?

Answer :In case one ,an intergenerational problem , the consequence of action by current generation will have huge impact on Future generation yet to born. Current generation can fore go benefit today in order of protect against catastrophic costs in the future. for developing countries it may lead break out of persistence cycle of poverty but limiting Green houses gases emitted into the protection of environment to protect future generation.

In another case, harms will happen to the intergenerational , and philosophical problems. In the Paris agreement it was decided that they will reduce the carbon emission by developed as well as under developed countries. But in these agreement it was stated that control climate change with reducing green house gas emission will be voluntary by individual country. Voluntary targets established by the nation in Paris climate deal fall considerably short of what scientist want was 2 degree Celsius limiting of global temperature increase. In these case it will be the challenge for developing countries as these will have huge impact societal demands for economic growth and prosperity.

2. To what extent do humans have a moral responsibility to future generations that are yet to be born? Explain your reasoning.

Answer :- To the huge extent it the responsibility on current generation to take care of environment to safe guard the future generation. The reason for safeguarding our nature is our destruction of the environment and climate will eventually have serious impacts on quality of life in the future generation. These also impact on limited source of energy and they may suffer with many environmental pulse physical issues. The generation may not be that health what is their in current scenario.

3. Arguably, actions to cut carbon emissions and curb global warming right now have real costs for certain segments of the global

Answer :- Action to cut CO2 emission and curb the global warming have huge impact on economic growth of under developed countries. Restriction on carbon emission will lead face real and economical costs when executing those pledges. Developing countries faced these impact of cost encountered further challenges as the impact of climate change will most likely fall disproportional on the poor .also raising the issues of fairness and inequality.

4. If you were in a position to recommend environmental policy changes or actions, what would you advocate and why? population while the benefits of such actions are more abstract. How should we balance the tangible costs in the present and abstract consequences in the future when addressing climate change? Explain.

Answer :- If in position to recommend the environmental policy changes that I would have proposed more focused on renewable and clean source of energy. I would also forced certain percentage of CO2 emission will be allowed for developed pulse developing countries. Developed countries would have ask for help in generating the technological solution with their top R&D center to reduce the green gas emission pulse reduce CO2 level action plan at industrial pulse individual level. With the help of Scientist will decide the target how much temperature countries has to contribute to resume global warming limit. To control tangential cost as country we can provide subsidies or reduce the industrial tax rate so that people of country will be focused on the issues and take necessary actions.

5. Do prosperous countries have a greater responsibility to take action and bear more of the costs of controlling climate change than developing countries? Explain your reasoning.

Answer :- Yes these countries have major responsibilities as many developing countries depend on developed countries for economical growth depend on there investments and supply and depends developed countries for finished goods. Developed countries may sign of environment policy while placing any order to any developing countries. This will limit them against carbon emission and fore focused should be given on green recourses which ate easily available,