Jonna Vella, Inc. is raising $250,000 in early stage money to fund development of their prototype. The company is still in a very early stage, and doesn't feel ready to put a valuation on themselves. So they are raising this round as a convertible debt round with the following parameters: the debt will convert to equity on the first priced round, at the valuation of the firm in that priced round, plus a 20% bonus. The debt will earn 5% per year until conversion. Suppose that the company raises $1 million in a priced round in one year, and that the round values the company at $10 million.
How much will the debt be worth (in dollars) at the time of conversion?
What % ownership of the company will that represent, at the time of conversion?
What % ownership of the company will the new investors want to own for their $1 million?
If the founders own 100,000 shares, how many shares will the new investors receive?
How many shares will the convertible debt holders receive at conversion?
Make a simple table to show the shares owned, and corresponding % ownership, by each of the three groups (founders, convertible debt investors, equity investors) after conversion.
Suppose that the convertible debt investors try to negotiate a larger "bonus" of 25% to their investment (so they would receive an extra 25% share of the company instead of 20%). Who would benefit from this, and who would lose?
Suppose that the convertible debt investors negotiate a valuation "cap" of $5 million. This means that their debt would convert as if the company were worth no more than $5 million, regardless of the valuation from the priced round. Who wins and loses with this valuation cap?
Explain each question
Case 1
The debt will have a 20% bonus at the time of conversion. Hence,
the value of the debt will be 1.2 times the original value. Note
that the 5% coupon earned on the debt will not be considered at
this time of valuation since this is the fixed portion and settled
in cash.
value of debt in beginning | 250,000 | |
bonus multiple | 1.2 | |
value of debt in conversion | 300,000 | =250,000*1.2 |
The post money valuation of the company is $10Mn. The ownership structure is as follows-
Group | $ value of ownership | % ownership | no of shares | per share price |
1st round funding investor | 1,000,000 | 10.0% | 11,494 | 87.00 |
Convertible debt holder | 300,000 | 3.0% | 3,448 | 87.00 |
Promoter / founder | 8,700,000 | 87.0% | 100,000 | 87.00 |
Total | 10,000,000 | 100.0% | 114,943 | 87.00 |
Per share price will be same for all the investors since there is not mention of differential share price. The per share price for all investors will be based on the per share price of promoters shares i.e. 8.7M/ 100,000= $87. Rest of the investors will have $87 as the per share price and receive proportionate number of shares as- $$ ownership/ per share price
Case 2
Bonus factor- 25% instead of 20%
value of debt in beginning | 250,000 | |
bonus multiple | 1.3 | |
value of debt in conversion | 312,500 | =250,000*1.25 |
The post money valuation will remain the same. However, the ownership structure will change as below-
Group | $ value of ownership | % ownership | no of shares | per share price |
1st round funding investor | 1,000,000 | 10.0% | 11,511 | 86.88 |
Convertible debt holder | 312,500 | 3.1% | 3,597 | 86.88 |
Promoter / founder | 8,687,500 | 86.9% | 100,000 | 86.88 |
Total | 10,000,000 | 100.0% | 115,108 | 86.88 |
As we can see here, the % ownership of convertible debt holders and 1st round capital providers has increased by that of promoters/ founders has gone down. The number of shares allocated to the founders is constant at 100,000. Hence, the per share price for all the investors has gone down.
Case 3
The convertible debt holders will get an equivalent ownership in
the company post-valuation as if the company valuation was $5Mn in
this case. The easiest and most common way to achieve this is to
fix the % ownership of the convertible debt holders after valuation
for $5Mn valuation and carry this % ownership to the fill valuation
of the company.
value of debt in beginning | 250,000 | |
bonus multiple | 1.2 | |
value of debt in conversion | 300,000 | =250,000*1.2 |
Group | $ value of ownership | % ownership | no of shares | per share price |
Convertible debt holder | 300,000 | 6.0% | 6,383 | 47.00 |
Promoter / founder | 4,700,000 | 94.0% | 100,000 | 47.00 |
Total | 5,000,000 | 100.0% | 106,383 | 47.00 |
As we can see here, the convertible debt holders will receive 6% ownership in the company after valuation, irrespective of the actual valuation of the company due to the $5Mn cap. The % ownership of the original founders will be adjusted to accommodate the changes. the new ownership structure will be as follows-
Group | $ value of ownership | % ownership | no of shares | per share price |
1st round funding investor | 1,000,000 | 10.0% | 11,905 | 84.00 |
Convertible debt holder | 600,000 | 6.0% | 7,143 | 84.00 |
Promoter / founder | 8,400,000 | 84.0% | 100,000 | 84.00 |
Total | 10,000,000 | 100.0% | 119,048 | 84.00 |
As we can see here, the ownership of the founders has decreased from 87% in original arrangement to 84% in the case with valuation cap. The convertible debt holders has gained 3% additional stake in the company for the same investment. The 1st round investors have remained unchanged. This clearly stated the winners (convertible debt holder) and losers (founders) in the case valuation cap.
Jonna Vella, Inc. is raising $250,000 in early stage money to fund development of their prototype...
Refer to the sample cap table in Exhibit 5 of the Financing
Entrepreneurial Ventures reading. If the seed round had taken place
at a $2 million post-money valuation—but every other round happened
according to the terms described in Exhibit 5—who would be better
off and who would be worse off (in terms of their ownership
percentages of the company)?
Only the founders would be better off.
Everyone except the founders would be worse off.
Everyone except the seed round investors...
5. StartCo is an early stage company whose financial plans call for the company to be sold in 5 years, at a valuation of $10 million. You are considering an investment of $100,000 in StartCo; you like the company but feel that it is a fairly risky venture, so you want a 40% annual return on your investment. a. What is the present value of StartCo, using your required rate of return as the discount rate? b. What % of...
One million (1,000,000) shares of stock were issued to the founders of a start-up company on January 1, 2019. On July 1, 2019, the firm raised $500,000 from outside investors and issued 500,000 of convertible preferred stock with a conversion price of $1 per share (ROUND 1). At the time capital was raided, the investors insisted on a FIVE YEAR vesting schedule for the founders’ initial equity interest, with vesting on a monthly basis (1/60 of the founders’ interest vests...
After years of operating losses, OnePipe New Zealand Limited has shut down most of its operations. The company is financed partly by equity and partly by four issues of debt. There are 1,000,000 shares outstanding with a par value of s1.00 per share. The outstanding debts are: A. Convertible junior debt with a total face value of $140 million, the conversion ratio is 500 B. Senior debt with a total face value of $200 million; C. $150 million loan secured...
Bonds Bonus On June 30, 2014, Upton, Inc. sold $100,000 of 8% bonds for $102,530. The bonds are dated June 30, 2014, pay interest annually on June 30, and will mature on June 30, 2019. On the basis of the above information, answer the following questions. (Round your answer to the nearest dollar or percent if necessary.) 1. What is the stated (face value) interest rate for this bond issue? 2. Were the bonds issued at a premium or a...
Problem #1 Homemade Leverage Mr. Green owns 250 shares of ABC Company. There are 12,500 shares of stock outstanding. The stock sells for $42 per share. The company is financed by 70% equity and 30% debt at 5.5% interest. Mr. Green can borrow at the same interest rate as the company. The company expects to earn $66,675 annually. Ignore taxes. Mr. Green is not pleased with the level of debt carried by the company, so he is planning to sell...
1. Why do callable bonds usually pay a higher coupon rate than noncallable bonds? A. To compensate investors for their extra tax liability B. Because callable bonds have greater default risk than noncallable C. To compensate investors who might suffer a loss as a result of their bonds being called D. To comply with SEC regulations E. None of the above 2. You own a convertible bond issued by MJ9 Corporation that can be exchanged for 60 shares of the...
questions 1-4 please
1. Why do callable bonds usually pay a higher coupon rate than noncallable bonds? A. To compensate investors for their extra tax liability B. Because callable bonds have greater default risk than noncallable C. To compensate investors who might suffer a loss as a result of their bonds being called D. To comply with SEC regulations E. None of the above 2. You own a convertible bond issued by MJ9 Corporation that can be exchanged for 60...
please I need this, step by step with formulas, avoid using excel.
CASE 33 Security Software, Inc. communication in a highly secure and efficient process. The Market Security Software, Inc. (SSI) was a major provider of application software. The firm was proud to be the number two company in the enterprise firewall market. Firewalls ensure network Security for businesses by determining whether to approve or deny access to corporate networks and applications. They have security software that inspects com- munication...
Answer questions 1 and 2 at the bottom
CP 13-6 Issuing stock Epstein Engineering Inc. began operations on January 5, 20Y8, with the issuance of 500,000 shares of $80 par common stock. The sole stockholders of Epstein Engineering Inc. are Barb Abrams and Dr. Amber Epstein, who organized Epstein Engineering Inc. with the objective of developing a new flu vaccine. Dr. Epstein claims that the flu vaccine, which is nearing the final development stage, will protect individuals against 90% of...