Question

Process Capablity Sixpack Report for Suppa 1. The process for supplier 2 is operaing under a. Common cause b Special cause c


Process Capability Sixpack Report for Supp2 Xbar Chart Capability Histogram 6002 970 55 6000 60LS 6010 6045 R Chart Normal Pr


Process Capability Sixpack Report for Supp2 Xbar Chart Capability Histogranm LSL Overall -Within UCL 602.376 602 LS 598 Targe
1. The process for supplier 2 is operating under a. Common cause b. Special cause c. Both common and special cause d. Neither
Process Capablity Sixpack Report for Suppa 1. The process for supplier 2 is operaing under a. Common cause b Special cause c Both common and special cause d Neither special or common cause 2. Wthin variation is basicaly a. An estimate of the shor-tem varation caloulating an average range b. An estimate of the long-lerm varation An estimate of the shor-em varaion caloulating an estimate for the standard deviation based on ranges of the samples d. An estimate of the shonterm varaion 3Overall variation is besicaly a. An estimate of the long-tem variation calculating an average range b. An estimate of the long-lerm varation An estimate of the long-lem variation caloulating an esimate for the standard devation based on al the samples puled together d. An estimate of the shor-term variaion Even though the process is not under control, the capability analysis makes sense True 5. The process for supplier 2 is capable since Cp 0.35 True 6. The process for supplier 2 is centered on the target value and this is a postive aspect 17. The Normal Probabity pit alows ustoestablsh hatbesuppier 2 process True False nonnal 8. The supplier 2 process have more than 2 special-cause variasion stuations True 9 The specficationsof600 ± 2mm couldchange byegliatngwmthecustomers True False 0 The supplier 2 process have a random patem right now and can be improved as well True
Process Capability Sixpack Report for Supp2 Xbar Chart Capability Histogram 6002 970 55 6000 60LS 6010 6045 R Chart Normal Prob Plot AD 0287, P 0615 LCL Last 20 Subgroups Capability Plot Overal 604 Dev 1672 Dev 1874 Within Cpm 0s Specs Figure 30. Process Capability Assessment-Six Pack for Camshaft-Supplier 2. Source: Olivares, L.(2018)
Process Capability Sixpack Report for Supp2 Xbar Chart Capability Histogranm LSL Overall -Within UCL 602.376 602 LS 598 Target 600 USL 602 600 LCL 598.084 598 9 11 3 5 1719 970 598.5 600.0 601.5 603.0 6045 R Chart Normal Prob Plot AD: 0.287, P: 0.615 UCL 7866 R-3.72 LCL-0 605 Last 20 Subgroups Capability Plot Overall 604 Overall StDev 1.672 Cp 0.40 Cpk 0.35 PPM 236119.5 StDev 1.874 Pp 036 Ppk 031 Cpm 035 PPM 209454 39 600 596 10 15 20
1. The process for supplier 2 is operating under a. Common cause b. Special cause c. Both common and special cause d. Neither special or common cause 2. Within variation is basically. a. An estimate of the shor-lerm variation calculating an average range b. An estimate of the long-term variation c. An estimate of the short-term variation calculating an estimate for the standard deviation based on ranges of the samples An estimate of the short-term variation d. 3. Overall variation is basicaly An estimate of the long-term variation calculating an average range b. a. An estimate of the long-term variation c. An estimate of the long-term variation calculating an estimate for the standard deviation based on all the samples pulled together An estimate of the short-term variation d. 4. Even though the process is not under control, the capability analysis makes sense: True False 5. The process for supplier 2 is capable since Cp 035 True False 6. The process for supplier 2 is centered on the target value and this is a positive aspect: True False 7. The Nomal Probability plot allows us to establish that the supplier 2 process is norma True False 8. The supplier 2 process have more than 2 special-cause variation situations: True False 9. The specifications of 600 2 mm could change by negotating with the customers True False 10. The supplier 2 process have a random pattern right now and can be improved as wel True False
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

SOLUTION

1) C is correct

Both common cause and special cause (Because two points lies outside the upper control limit

2) Option A is correct

With in variation basically an estimate of short term variation calculating an average range

3)Option C is correct

Overall variation is estimate of long term variation calculating the estimate of standard deviation based on all samples put together

4) True capability analysis make sense

5) It is false because value of Cp=0.35 process is not capable

6) it is false process is not centered on target

7) yes it is normal distribution it is true

8) false it has only 2 special cause bariation

9) True

10) true

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Process Capablity Sixpack Report for Suppa 1. The process for supplier 2 is operaing under a. Com...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Section Two (True/False) Regarding SPC and control charts: 3. Control limits and specification limits are both...

    Section Two (True/False) Regarding SPC and control charts: 3. Control limits and specification limits are both provided by the customer. cause variation SPC uses graphed statics to determine if a process has special Control limits for most control charts are set at 2 standard deviations. If a control chart signals special cause variation, the cause will also be known. One should work on reducing common cause variation while eliminating special cause variation. Critical process outputs that are measured on a...

  • 1. How can a process be “in control” but not delivering what the customer wants? What is "process capability”? 2. I...

    1. How can a process be “in control” but not delivering what the customer wants? What is "process capability”? 2. If the LCL on a process is much greater than the LSL, will the customer tend to be “happy" or "disappointed” with the the results of this process? Why? 3. A) If Cp = 1.00, what % of good product is the process expected to deliver? Answer B) Complete the following: “A common minimum standard in industry is a Cp...

  • 1. Design X-bar and R charts a control chart with "standards given" as an aimed-at mean...

    1. Design X-bar and R charts a control chart with "standards given" as an aimed-at mean of Xo = 4.0, Sigma = .0033, and Subgroup size -5. It is not necessary to sketch the control-chart since we have no points to put on it. Just specify, CL, UCL and LCL. That is the design. 2. Then find the probability of in-control nonconformance given, USL = 4.00995 and LSL 3.99005 3. Also, by theory, what is the Probability of an out-of-control...

  • 1. Design X-bar and R charts a control chart with "standards given" as an aimed-at mean...

    1. Design X-bar and R charts a control chart with "standards given" as an aimed-at mean of Xo = 4.0, Sigma = .0033, and Subgroup size -5. It is not necessary to sketch the control-chart since we have no points to put on it. Just specify, CL, UCL and LCL. That is the design. 2. Then find the probability of in-control nonconformance given, USL = 4.00995 and LSL 3.99005 3. Also, by theory, what is the Probability of an out-of-control...

  • I. Given the following table of coating weights for samples of size n-4: (a) Calculate the x 's a...

    all in one I. Given the following table of coating weights for samples of size n-4: (a) Calculate the x 's and R's for samples 2 through & (b) Calculate the X and R values for all cight samples (c) Determine the appropriate constants that would be used with this data to constructx and R control charts, and calculate the control limits Range 18.5 17.9 19.6 22.2 16.5 19.0 2021.2 20.5 20.3 18.90 19.8 20.4 22.8 19.0 20.7 22.2 20.5...

  • 1. Design X-bar and R charts a control chart with "standards given" as an aimed-at mean...

    1. Design X-bar and R charts a control chart with "standards given" as an aimed-at mean of Xo 4.0, Sigma 0033, and Subgroup size 5. It is not necessary to sketch the control-chart since we have no points to put on it. Just specify, CL, UCL and LCL. That is the design. 2. Then find the probability of in-control nonconformance given, USL 4.00995 and LSL = 3.99005 3. Also, by theory, what is the Probability of an out-of-control point when...

  • Question 15 (1 point) The process capability ratio (Cp) of a Six Sigma Program is 2....

    Question 15 (1 point) The process capability ratio (Cp) of a Six Sigma Program is 2. (The upper and lower specification limits are each 6σ away from the mean. True False

  • Statics help needed urgently ! part 1 part 2 Design X-bar and R charts a control...

    Statics help needed urgently ! part 1 part 2 Design X-bar and R charts a control chart with "standards given" as an aimed-at mean of Xo 4.0, Sigma.0033, and Subgroup size 5. It is not necessary to sketch the control-chart since we have no points to put on it. Just specify, CL, UCL and LCL. That is the design. Then find the probability of in-control nonconformance given, USL 4.00995 and LSL 3.99005 Also, by theory, what is the Probability of...

  • 1. What is the UCL for the XBar chart based on the data below, with n=4, and ten set of samples f...

    1. What is the UCL for the XBar chart based on the data below, with n=4, and ten set of samples for the weight of soft drinks are given. USL for the product is 355 g and LSL is 345. Daily production is 15000 units. Sample # Observations 1 352 348 350 351 2 351 352 351 350 3 351 346 342 350 4 349 353 352 352 5 351 350 351 351 6 353 351 346 346 7 348...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT