Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows.
6.96 | 7.10 | 5.84 | 5.91 | 7.31 | 7.18 |
7.06 | 5.79 | 6.24 | 5.91 | 6.14 |
Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample
variance is s2 ≈ 0.384.
Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following
annual wheat production (in pounds).
5.91 | 5.91 | 5.91 | 5.91 | 7.22 | 5.58 | 5.47 | 5.86 |
Use a calculator to verify that the sample variance for this
plot is s2 ≈ 0.284.
Test the claim that there is a difference (either way) in the
population variance of wheat straw production for these two plots.
Use a 5% level of signifcance.
(a) What is the level of significance?
State the null and alternate hypotheses.
Ho: σ12 = σ22; H1: σ12 > σ22
Ho: σ12 > σ22; H1: σ12 = σ22
Ho: σ22 = σ12; H1: σ22 > σ12
Ho: σ12 = σ22; H1: σ12 ≠ σ22
(b) Find the value of the sample F statistic. (Use 2
decimal places.)
What are the degrees of freedom?
dfN | |
dfD |
What assumptions are you making about the original distribution?
The populations follow dependent normal distributions.
We have random samples from each population.
The populations follow independent normal distributions.
The populations follow independent chi-square distributions.
We have random samples from each population.
The populations follow independent normal distributions.
We have random samples from each population.
(c) Find or estimate the P-value of the sample test
statistic. (Use 4 decimal places.)
p-value > 0.200
0.100 < p-value < 0.200
0.050 < p-value < 0.100
0.020 < p-value < 0.050
0.002 < p-value < 0.020
p-value < 0.002
(d) Based on your answers in parts (a) to (c), will you reject or
fail to reject the null hypothesis?
At the α = 0.05 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.
At the α = 0.05 level, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.
At the α = 0.05 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.
At the α = 0.05 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are statistically significant.
(e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the
application.
Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that the variance in annual wheat production differs between the two plots.
Reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the variance in annual wheat production differs between the two plots.
Reject the null hypothesis, there is sufficient evidence that the variance in annual wheat production differs between the two plots. Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the variance in annual wheat production differs between the two plots.
a level of significance =0.05
Ho: σ12 = σ22; H1: σ12 ≠ σ22
b)
value of the sample F statistic =(s1/s2)2 = 0.384/0.284=1.35
dfN =10
dfD =7
The populations follow independent normal distributions.
c)
p-value > 0.200
d)
At the α = 0.05 level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude the data are not statistically significant.
e)
Fail to reject the null hypothesis, there is insufficient evidence that the variance in annual wheat production differs between the two plots.
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a ra...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows. 6.33 5.84 5.98 5.77 7.31 7.18 7.06 5.79 6.24 5.91 6.14 Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample variance is s2 ≈ 0.340. Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds). 5.91 5.77 6.47 6.75...
Rothamsted Experimental Station (England) has studied wheat production since 1852. Each year, many small plots of equal size but different soil/fertilizer conditions are planted with wheat. At the end of the growing season, the yield (in pounds) of the wheat on the plot is measured. For a random sample of years, one plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds). 4.29 3.90 3.99 3.87 4.29 3.79 4.09 4.42 3.89 3.87 4.12 3.09 4.86 2.90 5.01 3.39 Use a calculator...
Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows. 5.91 7.10 5.70 5.91 7.31 7.18 7.06 5.79 6.24 5.91 6.14 Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample variance is s2 ≈ 0.404. Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds). 7.38 6.68 7.59 6.75...
6)Two plots at Rothamsted Experimental Station were studied for production of wheat straw. For a random sample of years, the annual wheat straw production (in pounds) from one plot was as follows. 6.68 5.84 7.03 6.89 7.31 7.18 7.06 5.79 6.24 5.91 6.14 Use a calculator to verify that, for this plot, the sample variance is s2 ≈ 0.335. Another random sample of years for a second plot gave the following annual wheat production (in pounds). 7.59 6.12 6.54 7.80...
A random sample of leading companies in South Korea gave the following percentage yields based on assets. 2.1 2.3 4.2 1.9 0.5 3.6 2.4 0.2 1.7 1.8 1.4 5.4 1.1 Use a calculator to verify that s2 ≈ 2.125 for these South Korean companies. Another random sample of leading companies in Sweden gave the following percentage yields based on assets. 2.2 3.8 3.9 1.1 3.9 2.8 2.3 3.5 2.8 Use a calculator to verify that s2 ≈ 0.909 for these...
A new thermostat has been engineered for the frozen food cases in large supermarkets. Both the old and new thermostats hold temperatures at an average of 25°F. However, it is hoped that the new thermostat might be more dependable in the sense that it will hold temperatures closer to 25°F. One frozen food case was equipped with the new thermostat, and a random sample of 26 temperature readings gave a sample variance of 5.2. Another similar frozen food case was...
A new thermostat has been engineered for the frozen food cases in large supermarkets. Both the old and new thermostats hold temperatures at an average of 25°F. However, it is hoped that the new thermostat might be more dependable in the sense that it will hold temperatures closer to 25°F. One frozen food case was equipped with the new thermostat, and a random sample of 21 temperature readings gave a sample variance of 5.2. Another similar frozen food case was...
A new fuel injection system has been engineered for pickup trucks. The new system and the old system both produce about the same average miles per gallon. However, engineers question which system (old or new) will give better consistency in fuel consumption (miles per gallon) under a variety of driving conditions. A random sample of 41 trucks was fitted with the new fuel injection system and driven under different conditions. For these trucks, the sample variance of gasoline consumption was...
A new fuel injection system has been engineered for pickup trucks. The new system and the old system both produce about the same average miles per gallon. However, engineers question which system (old or new) will give better consistency in fuel consumption (miles per gallon) under a variety of driving conditions. A random sample of 31 trucks were fitted with the new fuel injection system and driven under different conditions. For these trucks, the sample variance of gasoline consumption was...
An economist wonders if corporate productivity in some countries is more volatile than in other countries. One measure of a company's productivity is annual percentage yield based on total company assets. A random sample of leading companies in France gave the following percentage yields based on assets. 4.2 5.5 3.6 3.9 2.7 3.5 2.8 4.4 5.7 3.4 4.1 6.8 2.9 3.2 7.2 6.5 5.0 3.3 2.8 2.5 4.5 Use a calculator to verify that the sample variance is s2 ≈...