Question

5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area, for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive. Firm Cost of Eliminating the... First Unit of Pollution Second Unit of Pollution Third Unit of Pollution (Dollars) (Dollars) (Dollars)

Firm X 130 165 220

Firm Y 90 115 140

Firm Z 600 750 1,200

Now, imagine that two government employees proposed alternative plans for reducing pollution by 6 units. Method 1: Regulation The first government employee suggests limiting pollution through regulation. To meet the pollution goal, the government requires each firm to reduce its pollution by 2 units. Complete the following table with the total cost to each firm of reducing its pollution by 2 units.

Firm Total Cost of Eliminating Two Units of Pollution (Dollars) Firm X Firm Y Firm Z

Method 2: Tradable Permits Meanwhile, the other employee proposes using a different strategy to achieve the government's goal of reducing pollution in the area from 12 units to 6 units. This employee suggests that the government issue two pollution permits to each firm. For each permit a firm has in its possession, it can emit 1 unit of pollution. Firms are free to trade pollution permits with one another (that is, buy and sell them) as long as both firms can agree on a price. For example, if firm X agrees to sell a permit to firm Y at an agreed-upon price, then firm Y would end up with three permits and would need to reduce its pollution by only 1 unit while firm X would end up with only one permit and would have to reduce its pollution by 3 units. Assume the negotiation and exchange of permits are costless. Because firm Z has high pollution-reduction costs, it thinks it might be better off buying a permit from firm Y and a permit from firm X so that it doesn't have to reduce its own pollution emissions. At which of the following prices is firm Y willing to sell one of its permits to firm Z, but firm X is not?

Check all that apply.

a.) $123

b.)$212

c.)$219

d.)$569

e.)$595

Suppose the the government has set the trading price of a permit at $218 per permit. Complete the following table with the action each firm will take at this permit price, the amount of pollution each firm will eliminate, and the amount it costs each firm to reduce pollution to the necessary level. If a firm is willing to buy two permits, assume that it buys one permit from each of the other firms. (Hint: Do not include the prices paid for permits in the cost of reducing pollution.)

Firm Initial Pollution Permit Allocation Action Final Amount of Pollution Eliminated Cost of Pollution Reduction (Units of pollution) (Units of pollution) (Dollars) Firm X 2 Firm Y 2 Firm Z 2 Regulation Versus Tradable Permits

Determine the total cost of eliminating six units of pollution using both methods, and enter the amounts in the following table. (Hint: You might need to get information from previous tasks to complete this table.) Proposed Method Total Cost of Eliminating Six Units of Pollution (Dollars) Regulation Tradable Permits In this case, you can conclude that eliminating pollution is costly to society when the government regulates each firm to eliminate a certain amount of pollution than when it allocates pollution permits that can be bought and sold.

5. Correcting for negative externalities - Regulation versus tradable permits Suppose the government wants to reduce the total pollution emitted by three local firms. Currently, each firm is creating 4 units of pollution in the area for a total of 12 pollution units. If the government wants to reduce total pollution in the area to 6 units, it can choose between the following two methods: Available Methods to Reduce Pollution 1. The government sets pollution standards using regulation. 2. The government allocates tradable pollution permits. Each firm faces different costs, so reducing pollution is more difficult for some firms than others. The following table shows the cost each firm faces to eliminate each unit of pollution. For each firm, assume that the cost of reducing pollution to zero (that is, eliminating all 4 units of pollution) is prohibitively expensive. Cost of Eliminating the... Second Unit of Pollution (Dollars) 165 First Unit of Pollution (Dollars) 130 Firm Firm Firm X Y Third Unit of Pollution (Dollars) 220 140 1,200 Firm z 600 Now, imagine that two government employees proposed alternative plans for reducing pollution by 6 units. Method 1: Regulation The first government employee suggests limiting pollution through regulation. To meet the pollution goal, the government requires each firm to

Answer 1

Method 1 Regulation

Firm X = 130+165=295

Firm Y= 90+115 = 205

Firm Z= 600+750 = 1350

Method 2 Tradable permits

Should be Between Y and X as Y is willing to sell but X is not

select 212 and 219

Firm	Initial permit	Action	Final Amount	Cost of reduction
X	2	don't buy/sell	2	295
Y	2	sell 1 permit	3	345
Z	2	buy 1 permit	1	600

Regulation vs Tradable permits

Regulation= 295+205+1350 = 1850

Tradable permits = 295+345+600 = 1240

In this case, you can conclude that eliminating pollution is More costly to society when the government regulates.