Question

Case Study Assignment

Selection- No other Phase Is More Important: Mobile Nursing Devices Tools Case Study: Our story began almost 2 years ago. As a consultant, this author participated In a team that completed a device needs assessment for the selection of point-of-care documentation devices for Big Healthcare System (BHS). Our consultant team was engaged because of an unsatisfactory response from an employee to a member of the facility's board of directors. The question was "How did we arrive at the decision to select these certain machines that you are asking $1.7 million to purchase?" Our Team defined the following metrics for device selection: Device form factor analysis (workstations on wheels [WOWs], tables, other handheld devices) Provisions for spare machines Analysis of various clinician usage and preferences . Space availability within patient rooms during use and storage . Downtime strategies Wireless networking capacity and coverage . Integration with bar coding and scanning technologies . Electrical outlet availability (location and quantity) Reallocation of existing desktop machines for physician usage In total, this process was completed over the course of eight weeks, and upon presentation to the board of directors, out team literally received a standing ovation. Upon completion of our work, we presented our strategy and success around device selection, and the abstract of this write-up received a national award. Based on this success, there was great confidence in our processes. In a new opportuni device selection process as part of a larger project at a Regional Community Hospital IRCH) in the West, we expected to repeat our success. The project was initiated, and RCH built a team of invested. skilled, nd knowledgeable clinical and information technology staff. However, the device selection team was ty for a similar th

Answer questions:

What were some lessons learned from this case study? Do you think this author should participate in similar projects in the future? Why or why not? Would you have handled the rollout at the second location differently? If so, how?

Answer 1

The advisor group and the pioneer had effectively completed a contextual analysis on defense for utility and right choice of Point of Care Documentation Devices for the Big Health Care framework,
Their work and the report, advocating the reason, regarding why these machines had been chosen for this clinic at a tremendous expense of $1.7Mi.
The report won honors from the doctor's facility administration as well as won a national honor.
The exercise previously was discovered that these machines have a few points of interest and are extremely helpful to give better human services at any healing center.
With the experience picked up in this task, where they completed a broad examination and labor for about two months, lastly presented an extremely all around readied and acknowledged report additionally, the specialist definitely knew the pre-imperatives, assets required and techniques, to be pursued, in such investigations.
Therefore, of their past experience and great work, they may have qualified and chosen for the following examination by an alternate customer Regional Community Hospital to convey it a comparative report in their healing center moreover.
With this experience and learning that they had picked up from their past task, they ought to positively take up further comparative examinations to make utilization of their experience and specialization. And yet when a customer, in view of your past experience, is giving you a rehashed business opportunity, it turns into the expert's good and moral obligation to give adequate data and ought to have disclosed with respect to how the investigation will be begun, led and finished.
There ought to have laid clear rules in transit the examination will be directed, illuminating further on acknowledged extent of study, assets required and a timetable with clear courses of events.
As I would like to think the specialist did not complete a charge and moral manage their customers by not giving the lucidity on the issues and the manner in which this investigation will be setup.
They have taken 2 years and still the investigation is on.
Had I been the expert, welcomed for an examination by a customer, in his office, in light of my past experience, I would have guaranteed the agreement is time bound, with clear provisos on the courses of events, assets and offices required from the advisor, punishments for postponements from the two sides.
The advantage of understanding of the advisor, in light of which an occupation is granted, ought to likewise be imparted to the client.