Question

Andretti Company hes a single product called a Dak. The company normally produces and sells 121,000 Daks each year at a selling price of $50 per unit. The company's unit costs at this level of activity are given below Direct naterials Direct labor Variable nanufacturing overhead Fixed manufacturing overhead Variable selling expenses Fixed selling expenses Total cost per unit $ 9.50 10.00 2.90 3.00 ($363,000 total) 3.70 5.50 ($665,50e total) $34.60 A number of questions relating to the production and sale of Daks follow. Each question is independent Required: 1-a. Assume that Andretti Company has sufficient capacity to produce 157,300 Daks each year without any increase in fixed manufacturing overhead costs. The company could increase its unit sales by 30 % above the present 121,000 units each year if it were willing to increase the fixed selling expenses by $130.000. What is the financial advantage (disadvantage) of investing an additlonal $130,000 in foxed selling expenses? 1-b. Would the additional investment be justified? 2. Assume again that Andretti Company has sufficient capacity to produce 157.300 Daks each year A customer in a foreign market wants to purchase 36,300 Daks. If Andretti accepts this order it would have to pay import duties on the Daks of $3.70 per unit and an additional $29.040 for permits and licenses. The only selling costs that would be associated with the order would be $2.00 per unit shipping cost. What is the break-even price per unit on this order? 3. The company has 500 Daks on hand that have some irregularities and are therefore considered to be "seconds." Due to the irregularities, it will be impossible to sell these units at the normal price through regular distribution channels. What is the unit cost figure that is relevant for setting a minimum selling price? 4. Due to a strike in its supplier's plant, Andretti Company is unable to purchase more material for the production of Daks. The strike is expected to last for two months. Andretti Company has enough material on hand to operate at 25 % of normal levels for the two-month period. As an alternative. Andretti could close its plant down entirely for the two months. If the plant were closed, fixed manufacturing overhead costs would continue at 30% of their normal level during the two-month period and the fixed seling expenses would be reduced by 20 % during the two-month period a. How much total contribution margin will Andretti forgo if it closes the plant for two months? b. How much total fixed cost will the company avoid if it closes the plant for two months? c. What is the financial advantage idisadvantage) of closing the plant for the two-month period? d. Should Andretti close the plant for two months?

Answer 1

Solution

Andretti Company

1. Determination of the financial advantage or disadvantage of investing an additional $140,000 in fixed selling expenses:

Assumptions –

Increase in unit sales by 30% from 121,000 units to reach 157,300 units

Fixed manufacturing overheads remain same

Selling administrative overheads increase $130,000

Calculation of contribution margin –

Contribution margin = unit sales price – unit variable cost

Unit sales price =$50

Unit variable cost –

Direct materials                            $9.50

Direct labor                                   $10.00

Variable manufacturing overhead $2.90

Variable selling overhead             $3.70

Total                                             $26.10

Contribution margin = $50 - $26.10 = $23.90

Determination of additional net income from sale of additional units –

Additional units = 36,300 (121,000 x 30%)

Additional contribution = $23.90 x 36,300 = $867,570

Additional selling expenses                      $130,000

Additional income                        $737,570

Hence, the financial advantage of investing an additional $130,000 in fixed selling expenses to produce and sell additional 30% units (36,300) each year is increase in net income by $737,570.

1-b. Since the company has enough capacity to produce 157,300 Daks the increase in production and sales by 30% allows the company to fully absorb the fixed manufacturing overhead and selling and administration overhead.

Hence, the company is justified to make the additional investment of $130,000 to produce additional 30% units of Daks.

2. Evaluation of special order:

Given information –

            Number of units          36,300

Additional variable cost –

Import duty     $3.70

So, revised variable cost per unit –

Direct material                       $9.50

Direct labor                             $10.00

VMOH                                    $2.90

Selling OH                              $2.00

Import duty                             $3.70

Total variable cost per unit     $28.10

Additional fixed cost for permits and licenses $29,040

Break-even price per unit for the order,

At break-even, total revenues = total costs

Let the break-even price per unit be $x,

Revenues = $36,300x

Total costs = ($ 28.10 x 36,300) + $29,040

                        = $1,020,030 + $29,040 = $1,049,070

Hence, $36,300 x = $1,049,070

So, x = 1,049,070/36,300 = $28.90 per unit

The break-even price per unit for the special order is $28.90

3. Determination of the unit cost figure that is relevant for setting the minimum price for the 500 daks to be sold as ‘seconds’:

The relevant unit cost is the variable selling price - $3.70

Since the 500 Daks are already produced, the variable production costs are sunk costs and no more relevant.

The fixed costs are also sunk costs.

Since the 500 Daks are not to be sold through regular channels, the relevant unit cost figure for the determination of the minimum selling price is the variable selling expenses - $3.70

4.a Determination of the amount of contribution margin that Andretti has to forego if it closes the plant for two months:

when plant is closed for two months, the contribution margin for the two months production is lost.

Two months production = 121,000 x 2/12 = 20,167 units

25% production in two months = 20,167 x25% = 5,042 units

Contribution lost when plant is closed for two months = 5,042 x $23.90 = $120,504

Contribution Margin lost if the plant is closed for two months = $120,504

4.b. Determination of the fixed cost, which the company would avoid if the plant is closed for two months:

Since the company would incur 30% of fixed manufacturing cost, despite closing down of the plant,

The fixed manufacturing cost, the company would avoid is 70% -         70% of ($363,000 x 2/12) =$42,350

The fixed selling and administrative costs reduced by 20% = 20% of ($665,500 x2/12) =$22,183

Total fixed costs the company would avoid by closing the plant for two months = $42,350 + $22,183 = $64,533

Total avoidable fixed cost = $64,533

4.c financial advantage or disadvantage of closing the plant for two months –

Contribution margin lost if plant is closed = 23.90 x 5,042 units = $120,504

Contribution foregone = ($120,504)

Fixed costs avoided = $64,533

Disadvantage of closing the plant = excess contribution lost over avoidable fixed cost

                              = ($55,971)

4d. assuming the company operates the plant for two months –

25% production for two-month period-

Annual normal production = 121,000 units

Monthly production = 121,000/12 = 10,083 units

Two months normal production = 2 x 10,083 = 20,167 units

25% production for two months = 20,167 x 25% = 5,042 units

Contribution from 25% production = $23.90 x 5,042 units =$120,504

Total fixed cost –

Fixed manufacturing overhead     $363,000 x 2/12 = $60,500

Fixed selling overhead                 $665,500 x 2/12 = $110,917

Total fixed costs for two months = 60,500 + 110,917 = $171,417

Net profit/(Loss)                                                                          ($50,913)

Comparison of the net loss from continuing production with the net disadvantage of closing the plant for two months,

= ($55,971) – ($50,913) = ($5,058)

Since the relative loss on closing the plant is higher compared to continuing production for 2 months at 25% volume results in net loss of $5,058 the recommendation is to continue production for two months.

No, Andretti should not close the plant for two months.

5a Determination of Andretti’s avoidable cost per unit that it should compare to the price quoted by the outside manufacturer:

      Number of units offered to produce 121,000

Avoidable variable costs –

Direct materials cost         $9.50

Direct labor cost               $10.00

Variable MOH                  $2.90

Variable S&A OH            $1.23 ($3.70 x 1/3)

Total                                 $23.63

Total avoidable variable cost       $23.63            

Add: Avoidable fixed cost (30% of $363,000)/121,000 =$0.90

Total avoidable cost = $23.63 + $0.90 = $24.53

Avoidable cost per unit =$24.53

Hence, Andretti should accept a price that is less than the $24.53 per Dak from an outside manufacturer.