1) | ||||
Date | Activities | Units (a) | Rate (b) | Amount (a*b) |
Mar. 1 | Beginning inventory | 100 | $50 | $5,000 |
Mar. 5 | Purchases | 400 | $55 | $22,000 |
Mar. 18 | Purchases | 120 | $60 | $7,200 |
Mar. 25 | Purchases | 200 | $62 | $12,400 |
820 | $46,600 | |||
Therefore, cost of goods available for sale is $46,600 and number of units available for sale is 820 units. | ||||
2) | ||||
Date | Activities | Units (a) | ||
Mar. 1 | Beginning inventory | 100 | ||
Mar. 5 | Purchases | 400 | ||
Mar. 18 | Purchases | 120 | ||
Mar. 25 | Purchases | 200 | ||
820 | ||||
Less: | ||||
Mar. 9 | Sales | 420 | ||
Mar. 29 | Sales | 160 | ||
Ending inventory in units | 240 |
3) | Activities | Balance | |||||
FIFO: | Units (a) | Rate(b) | Amount (a*b) | Units (a) | Rate(b) | Amount (a*b) | |
Mar. 1 | Beginning inventory | 100 | $50 | $5,000 | |||
Mar. 5 | Purchases | 400 | $55 | $22,000 | 100 | $50 | $5,000 |
400 | $55 | $22,000 | |||||
Mar. 9 | Sales | 100 | $50 | $5,000 | |||
320 | $55 | $17,600 | 80 | $55 | $4,400 | ||
Mar. 18 | Purchases | 120 | $60 | $7,200 | 80 | $55 | $4,400 |
120 | $60 | $7,200 | |||||
Mar. 25 | Purchases | 200 | $62 | $12,400 | 80 | $55 | $4,400 |
120 | $60 | $7,200 | |||||
200 | $62 | $12,400 | |||||
Mar. 29 | Sales | 80 | $55 | $4,400 | |||
80 | $60 | $4,800 | 40 | $60 | $2,400 | ||
200 | $62 | $12,400 | |||||
Total | 580 | $31,800 | 240 | $14,800 | |||
Therefore, cost of goods sold is $31,800 with 580 units and ending inventory is $14,800 with 240 units. | |||||||
Activities | Balance | ||||||
LIFO: | Units (a) | Rate(b) | Amount (a*b) | Units (a) | Rate(b) | Amount (a*b) | |
Mar. 1 | Beginning inventory | 100 | $50 | $5,000 | |||
Mar. 5 | Purchases | 400 | $55 | $22,000 | 100 | $50 | $5,000 |
400 | $55 | $22,000 | |||||
Mar. 9 | Sales | 400 | $55 | $22,000 | |||
20 | $50 | $1,000 | 80 | $50 | $4,000 | ||
Mar. 18 | Purchases | 120 | $60 | $7,200 | 80 | $50 | $4,000 |
120 | $60 | $7,200 | |||||
Mar. 25 | Purchases | 200 | $62 | $12,400 | 80 | $50 | $4,000 |
120 | $60 | $7,200 | |||||
200 | $62 | $12,400 | |||||
Mar. 29 | Sales | 160 | $62 | $9,920 | 80 | $50 | $4,000 |
120 | $60 | $7,200 | |||||
40 | $62 | $2,480 | |||||
Total Ending Inventory | 580 | $32,920 | 240 | $13,680 | |||
Therefore, cost of goods sold is $32,920 with 580 units and ending inventory is $13,680 with 240 units. | |||||||
Activities | Balance | ||||||
Weighted average: | Units (a) | Rate(b) | Amount (a*b) | Units (a) | Rate(b) | Amount (a*b) | |
Mar. 1 | Beginning inventory | 100 | $50 | $5,000 | |||
Mar. 5 | Purchases | 400 | $55 | $22,000 | 100 | $50 | $5,000 |
400 | $55 | $22,000 | |||||
Mar. 9 | Sales | 420 | $54 | $22,680 | |||
80 | $54 | $4,320 | |||||
Mar. 18 | Purchases | 120 | $60 | $7,200 | 80 | $54 | $4,320 |
120 | $60 | $7,200 | |||||
Mar. 25 | Purchases | 200 | $62 | $12,400 | 80 | $54 | $4,320 |
120 | $60 | $7,200 | |||||
200 | $62 | $12,400 | |||||
Mar. 29 | Sales | 160 | $59.80 | $9,568 | |||
240 | $59.80 | $14,352 | |||||
Total Ending Inventory | 580 | $32,248 | 240 | $14,352 | |||
Therefore, cost of goods sold is $32,248 with 580 units and ending inventory is $14,352 with 240 units. | |||||||
Activities | Balance | ||||||
Specific identification: | Units (a) | Rate(b) | Amount (a*b) | Units (a) | Rate(b) | Amount (a*b) | |
Mar. 1 | Beginning inventory | 100 | $50 | $5,000 | |||
Mar. 5 | Purchases | 400 | $55 | $22,000 | 100 | $50 | $5,000 |
400 | $55 | $22,000 | |||||
Mar. 9 | Sales | 80 | $50 | $4,000 | 20 | $50 | $1,000 |
340 | $55 | $18,700 | 60 | $55 | $3,300 | ||
Mar. 18 | Purchases | 120 | $60 | $7,200 | 20 | $50 | $1,000 |
60 | $55 | $3,300 | |||||
120 | $60 | $7,200 | |||||
Mar. 25 | Purchases | 200 | $62 | $12,400 | 20 | $50 | $1,000 |
60 | $55 | $3,300 | |||||
120 | $60 | $7,200 | |||||
200 | $62 | $12,400 | |||||
Mar. 29 | Sales | 40 | $60 | $2,400 | 20 | $50 | $1,000 |
120 | $62 | $7,440 | 60 | $55 | $3,300 | ||
80 | $60 | $4,800 | |||||
80 | $62 | $4,960 | |||||
Total Ending Inventory | 580 | $32,540 | 240 | $14,060 | |||
Therefore, cost of goods sold is $32,540 with 580 units and ending inventory is $14,060 with 240 units. |
4)
FIFO | LIFO | Weighted average method | Specific identification | |
Sales Revenue [(420 units * $85) + (160 units * $95) | $50,900 | $50,900 | $50,900 | $50,900 |
Less: Cost of Goods Sold | ($31,800) | ($32,920) | ($32,248) | ($32,540) |
Gross Profit | $19,100 | $17,980 | $18,652 | $18,360 |
,0lescence, and the Tulde Blsed on future customer demand. The losses DuL B čost of sales...
s Inventories such that there was a reversal lIIon for the 2015 write-down, how would Samsung account for this under IFRS? Would Samsung's accounting be different for this reversal if it reported under U.S GAAP? Explain. connect Warnerwoods Company uses a perpetual inventory system. It entered into the following purchases and sales transactions for March. (For specific identification, the March 9 sale consisted of 80 units from be- ginning inventory and 340 units from the March 5 purchase; the March...
Problem 6-1A Perpetual: Alternative cost flowsP Warnerwoods Company uses a perpetual inventory system. It entered into the following purchases and sales transactions for March. (For specific identification, the March 9 sale consisted of 80 units from beginning inventory and 340 units from the March 5 purchase; the March 29 sale consisted of 40 units from the March 18 purchase and 120 units from the March 25 purchase.) Units Acquired at Cost Date Activities Units Sold at Retail Beginning inventory 100...
PROBLEM SET A Warnerwoods Company uses a perpetual inventory system. It entered into the following purchases and sales transactions for March. (For specific identification, the March 9 sale consisted of 80 units from beginning inventory and 340 units from the March 5 purchase the March 29 sale consisted of 40 units from the March 18 purchase and 120 units from the March 25 purchase.) Problem 6-1A Perpetual: Alternative cost flows P1 Date Activities Units Acquired at Cost Units Sold at...
PROBLEM SET A connect Problem 6-1A Perpetual: Alternative cost flows P1 Warnerwoods Company uses a perpetual inventory system. It entered into the following purchases and sales transactions for March. (For specific identification, the March 9 sale consisted of 8o units from beginning inventory and 340 units from the March 5 purchase; the March 29 sale consisted of 40 units from the March 18 purchase and 120 units from the March 25 purchase.) Date Activities Units Acquired at Cost Units Sold...
Warnerwoods Company uses a perpetual inventory system. It entered into the following purchases and sales transactions for March. Units Sold at Retail Units Acquired at Cost 200 units @ $53.00 per unit 275 units@ $58.00 per unit Date Activities Mar. 1 Beginning inventory Mar. 5 Purchase Mar. 9 Sales Mar. 18 Purchase Mar. 25 Purchase Mar. 29 Sales Totals 360 units @ $88.00 per unit 135 units @ $63.00 per unit 250 units @ $65.00 per unit 230 units @...
Warnerwoods Company uses a perpetual inventory system. It entered into the following purchases and sales transactions for March Units Sold at Retail Units Acquired at Cost 100 units @ $50.00 per unit 400 units @ $55.00 per unit 420 units @ $85.00 per unit Date Activities Mar. 1 Beginning inventory Mar. 5 Purchase Mar. 9 Sales Mar. 18 Purchase Mar. 25 Purchase Mar. 29 Sales Totals 120 units @ $60.00 per unit 200 units @ $62.00 per unit 160 units...
Warnerwoods Company uses a perpetual Inventory system. It entered into the following purchases and sales transactions for March Units Sold at Retail Mar Mar 1 Beginning inventory 5 Purchase Units Acquired at Cost 240 units 553.80 per unit 205 units 558e per unit 600 units 588. Be per unit 155 units 290 units Mar. 18 Purchase Mar 25 Purchase Mar. 2 Sales Totals 563.80 per unit 565.8 per unit $98.8e per unit 278 units 670 units 3. Compute the cost...
Compute the cost assigned to ending inventory using (a) FIFO, (b) LIFO, (c) weighted average, and (d) specific identification. Warnerwoods Company uses a perpetual inventory system. It entered into the following purchases and sales transactions for March. Date Activities Units Acquired at Cost Units Sold at Retail Mar. 1 Beginning inventory 210 units @ $53.20 per unit Mar. 5 Purchase 280 units @ $58.20 per unit Mar. 9 Sales 370 units @ $88.20 per unit Mar. 18 Purchase 140 units...
Required information Problem 6-1A Perpetual: Alternative cost flows LO P1 [The following information applies to the questions displayed below.) Warnerwoods Company uses a perpetual inventory system. It entered into the following purchases and sales transactions for March Units Sold at Retail Units Acquired at Cost 170 units @ $52.40 per unit 260 units @ $57.40 per unit 330 units @ $87.40 per unit Date Activities Mar. 1 Beginning inventory Mar. 5 Purchase Mar. 9 Sales Mar 18 Purchase...
Warnerwoods Company uses a perpetual inventory system. It entered into the following purchases and sales transactions for March. Date Activities Units Acquired at Cost Units Sold at Retail Mar. 1 Beginning inventory 220 units @ $53.40 per unit Mar. 5 Purchase 285 units @ $58.40 per unit Mar. 9 Sales 380 units @ $88.40 per unit Mar. 18 Purchase 145 units @ $63.40 per unit Mar. 25 Purchase 270 units @ $65.40 per unit Mar. 29 Sales 250 units @...