a:
Year | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 |
0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 81250 | 325000 |
2 | 81250 | |
3 | 81250 | |
4 | 81250 |
b: Bonus Depreciation
(Since the expense is larger in earlier years, the cash flow will be larger)
NPV will be higher by $9545
Workings
Year | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | Difference in tax shield |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 81250 | 325000 | 73125 |
2 | 81250 | -24375 | |
3 | 81250 | -24375 | |
4 | 81250 | -24375 | |
NPV | $9,544.69 |
Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires...
Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $900,000 of equipment and is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation. She is unsure whether immediately expensing the equipment or using straight-line depreciation is better for the analysis. Under straight-line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4-year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight-line method). The company's WACC is 8%, and its tax rate is 20%. What would...
Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $950,000 of equipment and is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation. She is unsure whether immediately expensing the equipment or using straight-line depreciation is better for the analysis. Under straight-line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4-year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight-line method). The company's WACC is 10%, and its tax rate is 30%. What would...
Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $475,000 of equipment and is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation. She is unsure whether immediately expensing the equipment or using straight-line depreciation is better for the analysis. Under straight-line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4-year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight-line method). The company's WACC is 8%, and its tax rate is 20%. a. What...
Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $225,000 of equipment and is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation. She is unsure whether immediately expensing the equipment or using straight-line depreciation is better for the analysis. Under straight-line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4-year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight-line method). The company's WACC is 12%, and its tax rate is 30%. a. What...
Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $125,000 of equipment and is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation. She is unsure whether immediately expensing the equipment or using straight-line depreciation is better for the analysis. Under straight-line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4-year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight-line method). The company's WACC is 9%, and its tax rate is 25%. What would...
5. Problem 12.06 (Depreciation Methods) eBook Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $975,000 of equipment and is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation. She is unsure whether immediately expensing the equipment or using straight-line depreciation is better for the analysis. Under straight-line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4-year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight-line method). The company's WACC is 8%, and its...
5. Problem 12.06 (Depreciation Methods) eBook Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $250,000 of equipment and is eligible for 100% bonus depreciation. She is unsure whether immediately expensing the equipment or using straight-line depreciation is better for the analysis. Under straight-line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4-year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight-line method). The company's WACC is 10%, and its...
Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $525,000 of equipment. She is unsure what depreciation method to use in her analysis, straight-line or the 3-year MACRS accelerated method. Under straight-line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4-year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight-line method). The applicable MACRS depreciation rates are 33%, 45%, 15%, and 7%. The company's WACC is 13%, and its tax...
Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $900,000 of equipment. She is unsure what depreciation method to use in her analysis, straight-line or the 3-year MACRS accelerated method. Under straight-line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4-year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight-line method). The applicable MACRS depreciation rates are 33%, 45%, 15%, and 7%. The company's WACC is 11%, and its tax...
Charlene is evaluating a capital budgeting project that should last for 4 years. The project requires $975,000 of equipment. She is unsure what depreciation method to use in her analysis, straight-line or the 3-year MACRS accelerated method. Under straight-line depreciation, the cost of the equipment would be depreciated evenly over its 4-year life (ignore the half-year convention for the straight-line method). The applicable MACRS depreciation rates are 33%, 45%, 15%, and 7%. The company's WACC is 10%, and its tax...