Question

Using an article to support your problem statement, write a research problem statement and at least two research objectives you would advise Google to investigate related to consumer buyer behavior and the Google Self-Driving car.*

Answer 1

Few of the Research Objectives we would suggest Google for erratic Consumer behavior investigation:
-   Resolution for Privacy & Data confidentiality Issues faced by Users, directly or indirectly?
-   Shutting down of Google+ by April 2019 and Google+ API, and alternatives available?
-   Encryption and Security requirements for failed Social Network allowing malicious developers across the Global Network to collect the data of millions of users?
-   More UAT & Testing required to overcome Safety and Privacy concerns when it comes to Google Self Driving car technology relate to the brakes to robot car technology until it is proven safe?
Problem Statement:
Most of the Users are vulnerable for Data and confidential information thefts across the Global network connected via regional servers. Additionally, the issues to be addressed related to the technology front used in Google Self Driven Cars.
Basis of Problem Statement:
As per the reports, Google announced its failed social network will be shutting down for consumers following the discovery of an exploit that could have allowed malicious developer to collect the data of hundreds of thousands of users. The company said it had uncovered the vulnerability in March 2018 as part of Project Strobe. Google users face security issues; potentially impacting 52.5 million of them. Some users were impacted by a software update introduced in November 2018 that “contained a bug affecting a Google+ API.” The bug impacted approximately 52.5 million users in connection with the affected Google+ API.
Research was conducted in 4 U.S. states to find the support for Google Self Driving Cars, Public Polling results showed found that just 16% of voters in California, Florida, Michigan, and South Dakota say they would ride in a driverless car if it were available, compared to 74% who say they would not. 75% of voters say the company should not be allowed introduce driverless car technology until the technology is proven safe, compared to only 15% who think more driverless cars are needed on the roads.
The four states polled cover the political, demographic, and geographical spectrum, with varying concentrations of cars and auto industry jobs.