Question

QUESTION 4 Any attempt to limit, segregate, or classify employees in any way that would tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities is: not contrary to public policy. contrary to public policy in tune with public policy unfortunately how some managers think, but is not contrary to public policy QUESTION 5 Wrongful discharge can be shown where an employee is wrongfully terminated in retaliation for threatening to report to state authorities instances of alleged patient mistreatment. In such cases the employer may discharge an employee for fulfilling societal obligations. the employee should be terminated for failing to protect the employer. the employer may not discharge an employee for fulfilling societal obligations or in those instances in which the employer acts with a socially undesirable motive the employer is in compliance with the employment-at-will doctrine.

Answer 1

1)Option B

Contrary to public policy.

Any attempt to limit segregate or classify employees in any way that tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities is contrary to public policy.

It is harm towards to public and breach of law.

2)Option C.

The employer may not disclose an employee for fulfilling societal obligation or in those instances in which the employer acts with a socially undesirable motive.

Wrongfull discharge is an be shown here an employee is wrongfully terminated in retaliation for threatening to report state authorities instances to alleged patient mistreatment then the employer cannot disclose because it is law and he may act socially undesirable motive.