Here is an instance of a relation R(A,B,C,D):
Please just explain the feedback so I can attempt to solve it on my own!
A | B | C | D |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
1 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
1 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
1 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
2 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
2 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
2 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
Which of the following multivalued dependencies does this
instance of R satisfy?
A->> B
BD ->> C
D ->> AB
B->> AD
I already know it's not B-> AD as the Answer Selecion Feedback says the following:
Look at each pair of tuples that have the same
values for the attributes on the left side of the MVD. Consider the
two additional tuples created by swapping values for the attributes
on the right side of the MVD. (You may wish to review the formal
definition of an MVD.) Are those tuples both already in the
relation? If not, the MVD is not satisfied.
So if I'm checking to see if the MVD A->> B satisfies the
Relation R, I want to look at all values in A (since that is the
LHS of the MVD) that are the same so in this case, it would be 1
and 2. The part where I'm stuck on is what do they mean by
considering the 2 additional tuples created by swapping values for
the attributes on the right-hand side of the MVD?
V has the same A values as T and U so V sub A equals T sub-A,
furthermore, V has its B Values.
I then go back to the definition of MVD which says the following:
For all Tuples T and U that are in Relation R, if T with the
attributes A of T equal U for the attributes A of
U. THen there exists a 3rd Tuple V in R that has the following
properties:
Which of the following multi-valued dependencies does this instance of R satisfy?
I can't see that it satisfies any of them, there always seems to
be something missing. C > B is
multi-valued dependencies this instance of R satisfy.
Here is an instance of a relation R(A,B,C,D): Please just explain the feedback so I can...
Let R(A,B,C,D,E) be a relation with FDs F = {AB-C, CD-E, E-B, CE-A} Consider an instance of this relation that only contains the tuple (1, 1, 2, 2, 3). Which of the following tuples can be inserted into this relation without violating the FD's? (2 points) Select one: O (0, 1, 2, 4,3) (1,1,2,2,4) (1.2.2, 2, 3) o (1,1,3,2,3) All of the above can be inserted. None of the above can be inserted.
Suppose relation R(A, B, C) has the following tuples: and relation S(A, B, C) has the following tuples: Compute the intersection of the relations R and S. which of the following tuples is in the result? (2, 5, 4) (1, 2, 6) (2, 2, 6) (2, 5, 3)
R Consider an instance of relation R below A B C D E 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 2 4 5 2 4 1 4 5 5 5 4 2. 5 4 4 1 2 4 2 What would possibly be a candidate key of relation R? (2 points) Select one: AE BC BD CD All of the above. None of the above.
Let R(A, B, C, D, E) be a relation wit FDs F = {AB->C,
CD->E, E->B, CE->A}....
Question 4 Not yet answered Marked out of 2.00 P Flag question Let R(A,B,C,D,E) be a relation with FDs F = {AB-C, CD-E, E-B, CE-A} Consider an instance of this relation that only contains the tuple (1, 1, 2, 2, 3). Which of the following tuples can be inserted into this relation without violating the FD's? (2 points) Select one: 0 (0, 1,...
R Consider an instance of relation R below A B C D E 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 LO bs 5 4 5 2 4 5 2 5 5 4 1 4 5 4 2 5 4 4 1 2 4 2 What would possibly be a candidate key of relation R? (2 Points) Select one: O AE BC BD CD All of the above. None of the above.
Imagine a single poorly-designed table, r(R), with attributes A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M. You’ve looked over the naughty designer’s work and come up with the following logical functional dependencies. A —> {B, D, F}? B —> {G, H, I}? {A, C} —> {E, J, K}? {J, K} —> {L, M} H is a composite attribute group with 3 attributes; H1, H2, H3. H3 is a multivalued attribute. L is a multivalued attribute....
Consider an instance of relation R below 20 A B С D E 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 2 4 2 4 1 4 ي ي اي 5 5 5 4 2 4 4 1 4 2 N What would possibly be a candidate key of relation R? (2 Points) Select one: O AE BC BD CD All of the above. None of the above. O
Consider relation R = (A,B,C,D,E) for the following:
2. Is R in 2NF with the following functional dependencies? If not, normalize it. [5 points] A→BC -AD → E в с 3. Are the relations from the answer of question 2 in 3NF? If not normalize it. 5 points]
Given the following relation schemas and the sets of FD's: a- R(A,B,C,D) F={ABẠC,C7D, D´A, BC+C} b- R(A,B,C,D) F={BẠC, BD, AD>B} C- R(A,B,C,D) F={AB-C, DC+D, CD+A, AD+B} d- R(A,B,C,D) F={AB=C, C+D, D™B, DE} e- R(A, B, C, D, E) F= {AB+C, DB+E, AE>B, CD+A, ECD} In each case, (i) Give all candidate keys (ii) Indicate the BCNF violation Give the minimal cover and decompose R into a collection of relations that are BCNF. Is it lossless? Does it preserve the dependencies?...
Language: SQL - Normalization and Functional
Dependencies
Part 4 Normalization and Functional Dependencies Consider the following relation R(A, B, C, D)and functional dependencies F that hold over this relation. F=D → C, A B,A-C Question 4.1 (3 Points) Determine all candidate keys of R Question 4.2 (4 Points) Compute the attribute cover of X-(C, B) according to F Question 43 (5 Points) Compute the canonical cover of F.Show each step of the generation according to the algorithm shown in class....