Deal with a hypothetical watershed with the following parameters.Require actual HEC-HMS program computations.
Subbasin Number | Area (ac) | L (ft) | Lca (ft) | S (ft/mi) | Development (%) | Conveyance (%) |
1 | 1280 | 7000 | 4000 | 20 | 30 | 80 |
2 | 1485 | 9000 | 5050 | 20 | 28 | 80 |
3 | 2045 | 8750 | 4975 | 10 | 70 | 100 |
4 | 1517 | 8230 | 41 1 5 | 10 | 70 | 100 |
5 | 2752 | 10,000 | 6340 | 10 | 75 | 100 |
Assume S = S0 in each subbasin. The infiltration data are as follows:
Subbasin | Impervious (%) | SCS Curve Number |
1 | 20 | 78 |
2 | 18 | 80 |
3 | 52 | 85 |
4 | 55 | 85 |
5 | 60 | 90 |
Problem
Rain gage data are given in Table (a) for three rain gages within the watershed. Weight the gage data over the five subareas according to the weighting values given in Table (b) (see Example 1-3 in Chapter 1). Set up the meteorological model for subareas 1 through 5 in the watershed to reference this storm’s rainfall data. For example, subbasin 2 receives 1/3 of gage 100R rainfall and 2/3 of gage 200R rainfall. Enter the actual rain gage data and weights into HEC-HMS.
Table (a) Cumulative Rainfall Data
Time (hr) | Gage Numbers | ||
100R | 200R | 300R | |
0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
1 | 0.60 | 0.50 | 0.30 |
2 | 1 .03 | 1.10 | 0.93 |
3 | 1.06 | 1.10 | 0.95 |
4 | 1 .29 | 1.20 | 1.05 |
5 | 1.94 | 1.40 | 1.13 |
6 | 4.18 | 2.50 | 1.38 |
7 | 4.32 | 2.90 | 1.88 |
8 | 4.38 | 3.00 | 1.96 |
9 | 4.54 | 3.10 | 2.25 |
10 | 4.70 | 3.20 | 2.36 |
11 | 4.76 | 3.40 | 2.58 |
12 | 4.84 | 3.50 | 2.65 |
13 | 4.88 | 3.50 | 2.69 |
14 | 4.90 | 3.50 | 2.71 |
Table (b) Precipitation Gage Weights
Subbasin | Gage Numbers | ||
100R | 200R | 300R | |
1 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
2 | 0.33 | 0.67 | 0.00 |
3 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.39 |
4 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
We need at least 10 more requests to produce the solution.
0 / 10 have requested this problem solution
The more requests, the faster the answer.