Question

Apple made headlines by announcing that the price for its new iPhone X (a fancy term for 10) will range from $999 to $1,149. These prices are commanding attention because they are significantly higher than the base prices of the two other iPhone models that were also announced, the 8 ($699) and the 8 Plus ($799). The X's price is also noteworthy because it approaches, and breaches, the key threshold of $1,000. Boosting prices into four-digit territory crosses an important psychological barrier for consumers. Why did Apple push the limits of pricing on the highly anticipated device? A key reason involves using a premium price to set an expectation of excellence in consumers' minds. This is a pricing strategy similar to the one successfully implemented by the Eagles. The popular Southern California band, whose album Their Greatest Hits 1971-1975 is the second highest-selling album of all time, had broken up in 1980. After a 14-year hiatus, the band reunited to release a new album and embark on a worldwide tour. What differentiated this tour, from a pricing perspective, is that the Eagles were the first major rock band to break the $100 ceiling of concert prices by selling tickets above that critical threshold As a lifelong fan of the band - their hit song "Hotel California" seemed to play every 15 minutes on the radio when I was growing up in Cincinnati - $100+ tickets made sense to me. The band's timeless hits and lengthy absence from the music scene was fueling strong demand. Going back to the demand and supply fundamentals of Economics 101, this results in higher prices. To confirm my intuition, I called Irving Azoff, a well-respected personal manager in the music industry and the mastermind of this pricing strategy for the Eagles, his longtime client. Azoff said the Eagles' pricing wasn't just about matching supply and demand it was a statement of quality, "We used price to make a statement to fans that they are seeing the greatest American rock-and-roll band, not a washed-up reunion band," Azoff recalls. What a fascinating use of price. The Eagles expanded the scope of pricing beyond just capturing value, to setting a belief of excellence in consumers' minds. Of course, once the expectation was set, they had to deliver on their promise. With a three-hour, hit-filled concert that earned glowing critical reviews and propelled their concerts to top-grossing status in 1995, the Eagles more than delivered on their pledge. Apple shares the band's aspiration of setting an expectation of unrivaled greatness in consumers' minds. In announcing the release of the iPhone X, Apple's CEO, Tim Cook, unabashedly declared, "It is the biggest leap forward since the original iPhone." Bold marketing words are nice, but consumers are bombarded with, and often let down by, bubbly claims. As a result, we cynically filter the validity of these pitches. Setting a premium price is more of a concrete look-you-in-the-eye pledge: 'It's going to cost you, but believe me, it's worth it." In my view, Apple missed the opportunity to further use price to psychologically convey confidence. Specifically, it should have avoided the "end in 9 game for the iPhone X. Prices that end in 9 are typically coded by consumers as being much cheaper than the next number, ending in zero (99 cents versus $1.00, $99 versus $100. $999 versus $1.000). If the iPhone X is as revolutionary as Cook claims, he should have the confidence to say "We are not playing games - the price is $1,000.1 Pricing is far more than a strategy to equate demand with supply, it has many nuances. And, as was the case with the Eagles, so far it appears that Apple's pricing strategy is working The media is buzzing about the X's high price. Gene Munster, a leading Apple analyst, has predicted that 30% - 40% of Apple's customers are willing to pay $999 for the new iPhone. Now the waiting game begins to see if media and customer reviews will match expectations, and enable Apple to maintain its rockstar status. Questions 1. Do you think iPhone X is price-elastic or price-inelastic? Please explain. 2. Why did Apple and Eagle use the premium pricing strategy? Please see slide 17 of Topic 2 for reference. 3. What is/are the potential captive product(s) of iPhone X?

Answer 1

Answer:

1. iPhone X is price inelastic. This is because the price preys on willingness to pay of its loyal and captive customer base. These customers are willing to pay a high price for the brand image and high quality of features expected from iPhone X. Secondly, iPhone X is a luxury product, following the features of snob effect from its customers. The higher the price, the higher the status symbol. Thirdly, the customers have been used to using iPhone X for a long time and are reluctant to switch over to another brand. So iPhone X is price inelastic.

2. Apple and Eagle used premium pricing strategy because they both had established reputation and goodwill in the market. They both had loyal followers who valued quality over price. So, premium pricing was a quality statement of that customers/ fans could expect nothing less than the best performance.

3. iPhone X would NOT have a substitute in the form of a Samsung Galaxy or a Google Pixel. Customers pondering over the purchase of an iPhone X would consider a choice between a good computer/ laptop and iPhone X.