Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals
Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated Operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows:
Investment | Year | Operating Income | Net Cash Flow | |||
Proposal A: | $450,000 | 1 | $30,000 | $120,000 | ||
2 | 30,000 | 120,000 | ||||
3 | 20,000 | 110,000 | ||||
4 | 10,000 | 100,000 | ||||
5 | (30,000) | 60,000 | ||||
$60,000 | $510,000 | |||||
Proposal B: | $200,000 | 1 | $60,000 | $100,000 | ||
2 | 40,000 | 80,000 | ||||
3 | 20,000 | 60,000 | ||||
4 | (10,000) | 30,000 | ||||
5 | (20,000) | 20,000 | ||||
$90,000 | $290,000 | |||||
Proposal C: | $320,000 | 1 | $36,000 | $100,000 | ||
2 | 26,000 | 90,000 | ||||
3 | 26,000 | 90,000 | ||||
4 | 16,000 | 80,000 | ||||
5 | 16,000 | 80,000 | ||||
$120,000 | $440,000 | |||||
Proposal D: | $540,000 | 1 | $92,000 | $200,000 | ||
2 | 72,000 | 180,000 | ||||
3 | 52,000 | 160,000 | ||||
4 | 12,000 | 120,000 | ||||
5 | (8,000) | 100,000 | ||||
$220,000 | $760,000 |
The company's capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average rate of return of 12% is required on all projects. If the preceding standards are met, the net present value method and present value indexes are used to rank the remaining proposals.
Present Value of $1 at Compound Interest | |||||
Year | 6% | 10% | 12% | 15% | 20% |
1 | 0.943 | 0.909 | 0.893 | 0.870 | 0.833 |
2 | 0.890 | 0.826 | 0.797 | 0.756 | 0.694 |
3 | 0.840 | 0.751 | 0.712 | 0.658 | 0.579 |
4 | 0.792 | 0.683 | 0.636 | 0.572 | 0.482 |
5 | 0.747 | 0.621 | 0.567 | 0.497 | 0.402 |
6 | 0.705 | 0.564 | 0.507 | 0.432 | 0.335 |
7 | 0.665 | 0.513 | 0.452 | 0.376 | 0.279 |
8 | 0.627 | 0.467 | 0.404 | 0.327 | 0.233 |
9 | 0.592 | 0.424 | 0.361 | 0.284 | 0.194 |
10 | 0.558 | 0.386 | 0.322 | 0.247 | 0.162 |
Required:
1. Compute the cash payback period for each of the four proposals.
Cash Payback Period | |
Proposal A: | 4 years |
Proposal B: | 2 years, 4 months |
Proposal C: | 3 years, 6 months |
Proposal D: | 3 years |
2. Giving effect to straight-line depreciation on the investments and assuming no estimated residual value, compute the average rate of return for each of the four proposals. If required, round your answers to one decimal place.
Average Rate of Return | |
Proposal A: | % |
Proposal B: | % |
Proposal C: | % |
Proposal D: | % |
3. Using the following format, summarize the results of your computations in parts (1) and (2). By placing the calculated amounts in the first two columns on the left and indicate which proposals should be accepted for further analysis and which should be rejected. If required, round your answers to one decimal place.
Proposal | Cash Payback Period | Average Rate of Return | Accept or Reject | |
A | 4 years | % | Reject | |
B | 2 years, 4 months | % | Accept | |
C | 3 years, 6 months | % | Reject | |
D | 3 years | % | Accept |
4. For the proposals accepted for further analysis in part (3), compute the net present value. Use a rate of 12% and the present value of $1 table above. Round to the nearest dollar.
Select the proposal accepted for further analysis. | Proposal B | Proposal D |
Present value of net cash flow total | $ | $ |
Amount to be invested | $ | $ |
Net present value | $ | $ |
5. Compute the present value index for each of the proposals in part (4). If required, round your answers to two decimal places.
Select proposal to compute Present value index. | Proposal B | Proposal D |
Present value index (rounded) |
1. cash payback period
Investment | Year | cummulative Cash Flow | |||||
Proposal A: | $450,000 | 1 | $120,000 | ||||
2 | 240000 [120000+120000] | ||||||
3 | 350000 [240000+110000] | ||||||
4 | 450000 | ||||||
5 | 510000 |
initial investment will covered in 4th year
so payback period is 4years
cummulative cash flow | ||||
Proposal B: | $200,000 | 1 | $100,000 | |
2 | 1,80,000 | |||
3 | 240000 [180000+60000] | |||
4 | 270000 | |||
5 | 290000 |
year before cash recovery + unrecovered cash/ cash flow in next period
=2 + [200000-180000]/60000
=2+0.33 =2+ (12months*0.33)
=2 year 4months
cummulative cash flow | |||
Proposal C: | $320,000 | 1 | $100,000 |
2 | 1, 90,000 | ||
3 | 280000[190000+90000] | ||
4 | 360000 [280000+80000] | ||
5 | 440000 [360000+80000] |
= 3 + [320000-280000]/80000
=3 years 6 months
Proposal D: | $540,000 | 1 | $200,000 |
2 | 380,000[200000+180000] | ||
3 | 540000 | ||
4 | 660000 | ||
5 | 760000 |
3 years 540000 initial outflow will be covered back.
2]average rate of return = average income/ average investment
A = 60000/5=12000 average income
investment = 450000+0salvage/2
=225000
average rate of return = 12000/225000
=5.33%
B =90000/5 ] / [200000/2]
=18000/100000
=18%
C=[120000/5]/[320000/2]
=24000/160000
=15%
D=[220000/5]/[540000/2]
=44000/270000
=16.30%
3]
Proposal | Cash Payback Period | Average Rate of Return | Accept or Reject | |
A | 4 years | 5.33 | % | Reject |
B | 2 years, 4 months | 18 | % | Accept |
C | 3 years, 6 months | 15 | % | Reject |
D | 3 years | 16.30 | % | Accept |
4]
Select the proposal accepted for further analysis. | Proposal B | Proposal D |
Present value of net cash flow total | $226200 | $569000 |
Amount to be invested | $(200000) | $(540000) |
Net present value | $26200 | $29000 |
PV FACTOR | NET CASH FLOW | PRESENT VALUE OF CASH FLOW | |||
Proposal B: | $200,000 | 1 | 0.893 | $100,000 | 89300 |
2 | 0.797 | 80,000 | 63760 | ||
3 | 0.712 | 60,000 | 42720 | ||
4 | 0.636 | 30,000 | 19080 | ||
5 | 0.567 | 20,000 | 11340 | ||
PRESENT VALUE | 226200 |
PV FACTOR | NET CASH FLOW | PRESENT VALUE | ||||
Proposal D: | $540,000 | 1 | 0.893 | $200,000 | 178600 | |
2 | 0.797 | 180,000 | 143460 | |||
3 | 0.712 | 160,000 | 113920 | |||
4 | 0.636 | 120,000 | 76320 | |||
5 | 0.567 | 100,000 | 56700 | |||
TOTAL | 569000 |
5.PROFITABILITY INDEX = PRESENT VALUE OF NET CASH INFLOW/ CASH OUTFLOW
B =226200/200000
=1.13
D= 569000/540000
=1.05
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating...
-NM PR 11-6B Capital rationing decision for a service company involving Obj. 2, 3,5 four proposals Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Income from Net Cash Investment Year Operations Flow Proposal A: $450,000 $ 30,000 $120,000 30,000 120,000 20,000 110,000 10,000 100,000 (30,000) 60,000 $ 60,000 $510,000 Proposal B: $200,000 $...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2 64,000 200,000 3 64,000 200,000 4 24,000 160,000 5 24,000 160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2 64,000 200,000 3 64,000 200,000 4 24,000 160,000 5 24,000 160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2 64,000 200,000 3 64,000 200,000 4 24,000 160,000 5 24,000 160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2 64,000 200,000 3 64,000 200,000 4 24,000 160,000 5 24,000 160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2 64,000 200,000 3 64,000 200,000 4 24,000 160,000 5 24,000 160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2 64,000 200,000 3 64,000 200,000 4 24,000 160,000 5 24,000 160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000 $ 90,000 2 26,000 90,000 3 6,000 70,000 4 6,000...
Cash Payback period for a Service Company Jane's Clothing Inc. is evaluating two capital investment proposals for a retail outlet, each requiring an investment of $150,000 and each with an eight-year life and expected total net cash flows of $240,000. Location 1 is expected to provide equal annual net cash flows of $30,000, and Location 2 is expected to have the following unequal annual net cash flows: Year 1 $59,000 Year 2 44,000 29,000 Year 3 Year 4 18,000 Year...
Information on four investment proposals is given below: EXERCISE 7-5 Preference Ranking L07-5 the equipment's intangible benefits Investment Proposal A B С D Investment required Present value of cash inflows Net present value $(90,000) $(100,000) $170,000) $(120,000) 126,000 138,000 105,000 160,000 $36,000 $ 38,000 $35,000 $ 40,000 Life of the project 5 years 7 years 6 years 6 years Required: 1. Compute the project profitability index for each investment proposal. 2. Rank the proposals in terms of preference.
Information on four investment proposals is given below: Investment required Present value of cash inflows Investment Proposal Α D $(90,000) $ (100,000) $ ( 70,000) $ (120,000) 126,000 138,000 105,000 160,000 $ 36,000 $ 38,000 $ 35,000 $ 40,000 5 years 7 years 6 years 6 years Net present value Life of the project Required: 1. Compute the project profitability index for each investment proposal. (Round your answers to 2 decimal places.) 2. Rank the proposals in terms of preference....