Investment | Year | Income from Operations | Net CFs | Cumulative CFs | Payback Period | ARoR | |
Proposal A | $ 450,000 | 1 | $ 30,000 | $ 120,000 | $ 120,000 | Average profit/Investment | |
2 | $ 30,000 | $ 120,000 | $ 240,000 | (60000/5)/450000 | |||
3 | $ 20,000 | $ 110,000 | $ 350,000 | ||||
4 | $ 10,000 | $ 100,000 | $ 450,000 | ||||
5 | $ (30,000) | $ 60,000 | |||||
$ 60,000 | $ 510,000 | 4 years | 2.67% | ||||
Proposal B | $ 200,000 | 1 | $ 60,000 | $ 100,000 | $ 100,000 | ||
2 | $ 40,000 | $ 80,000 | $ 180,000 | =2 years + (200000-180000)/60000 *12 | |||
3 | $ 20,000 | $ 60,000 | $ 240,000 | ||||
4 | $ (10,000) | $ 30,000 | |||||
5 | $ (20,000) | $ 20,000 | |||||
$ 90,000 | $ 290,000 | 2 years, 4 months | 9.00% | ||||
Proposal C | $ 320,000 | 1 | $ 36,000 | $ 100,000 | $ 100,000 | ||
2 | $ 26,000 | $ 90,000 | $ 190,000 | ||||
3 | $ 26,000 | $ 90,000 | $ 280,000 | =3 years+40000/80000*12 | |||
4 | $ 16,000 | $ 80,000 | $ 360,000 | ||||
5 | $ 16,000 | $ 80,000 | |||||
$ 120,000 | $ 440,000 | 3 years, 6 months | 7.50% | ||||
Proposal D | $ 540,000 | 1 | $ 92,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 200,000 | ||
2 | $ 72,000 | $ 180,000 | $ 380,000 | ||||
3 | $ 52,000 | $ 160,000 | $ 540,000 | ||||
4 | $ 12,000 | $ 120,000 | |||||
5 | $ (8,000) | $ 100,000 | |||||
$ 220,000 | $ 760,000 | 3 years | 8.15% |
INote : Income from Operations were given effect to depreciation for each proposal already.
Proposal | Payback period (max 3 years) | Average Rate of return (>12%) | Accept for further analysis | Reject |
A | 4 years | 2.67% | r | |
B | 2 years, 4 months | 9.00% | a | |
C | 3 years, 6 months | 7.50% | r | |
D | 3 years | 8.15% | a |
Calculation of NPV
Net CFs | PV of cash flows | ||||||||
Year | Proposal A | Proposal B | Proposal C | Proposal D | PVF @ 12% | Proposal A | Proposal B | Proposal C | Proposal D |
1 | $ 120,000 | $ 100,000 | $ 100,000 | $ 200,000 | 0.8929 | $ 107,143 | $ 89,286 | $ 89,286 | $ 178,571 |
2 | $ 120,000 | $ 80,000 | $ 90,000 | $ 180,000 | 0.7972 | $ 95,663 | $ 63,776 | $ 71,747 | $ 143,495 |
3 | $ 110,000 | $ 60,000 | $ 90,000 | $ 160,000 | 0.7118 | $ 78,296 | $ 42,707 | $ 64,060 | $ 113,885 |
4 | $ 100,000 | $ 30,000 | $ 80,000 | $ 120,000 | 0.6355 | $ 63,552 | $ 19,066 | $ 50,841 | $ 76,262 |
5 | $ 60,000 | $ 20,000 | $ 80,000 | $ 100,000 | 0.5674 | $ 34,046 | $ 11,349 | $ 45,394 | $ 56,743 |
$ 510,000 | $ 290,000 | $ 440,000 | $ 760,000 | $ 378,699 | $ 226,182 | $ 321,329 | $ 568,956 | ||
Less : Investment | $ 450,000 | $ 200,000 | $ 320,000 | $ 540,000 | |||||
NPV | $ (71,301) | $ 26,182 | $ 1,329 | $ 28,956 | |||||
PV Index/Profitability index | |||||||||
(PV of CFs/Investment) | $ 0.84 | $ 1.13 | $ 1.00 | $ 1.05 |
Ranking :
NPV | Ranking | PV Index/Profitability index | Ranking | |
Proposal A | $ (71,301) | 4 | 0.84 | 4 |
Proposal B | $ 26,182 | 2 | 1.13 | 1 |
Proposal C | $ 1,329 | 3 | 1.00 | 3 |
Proposal D | $ 28,956 | 1 | 1.05 | 2 |
Note: Rank 1 - Most Attractive
Rank 4 - Least attractive
8. NPV ranks proposal 4 as most attractive while PV index ranks proposal 2 as most attractive. NPV measures only the profitability of a proposed project/investment. Also, more NPV does not necessarily mean the return on investment is good. Ranking on the basis of more surplus or less surplus without taking into account the amount of investment that goes into the project, is flawed during capital rationing which is why we calculate Profitability index that measures the PV of benefits for every dollar of investment. Therefore, the company should invest its limited capital based on the PI ranking of every proposal.
-NM PR 11-6B Capital rationing decision for a service company involving Obj. 2, 3,5 four proposals...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2 64,000 200,000 3 64,000 200,000 4 24,000 160,000 5 24,000 160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated Operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $450,000 1 $30,000 $120,000 2 30,000 120,000 3 20,000 110,000 4 10,000 100,000 5 (30,000) 60,000 $60,000 $510,000 Proposal B: $200,000 1 $60,000 $100,000 2 40,000 80,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2 64,000 200,000 3 64,000 200,000 4 24,000 160,000 5 24,000 160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2 64,000 200,000 3 64,000 200,000 4 24,000 160,000 5 24,000 160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2 64,000 200,000 3 64,000 200,000 4 24,000 160,000 5 24,000 160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...
Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2 64,000 200,000 3 64,000 200,000 4 24,000 160,000 5 24,000 160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...
Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2 64,000 200,000 3 64,000 200,000 4 24,000 160,000 5 24,000 160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000 $ 90,000 2 26,000 90,000 3 6,000 70,000 4 6,000...
Cash Payback period for a Service Company Jane's Clothing Inc. is evaluating two capital investment proposals for a retail outlet, each requiring an investment of $150,000 and each with an eight-year life and expected total net cash flows of $240,000. Location 1 is expected to provide equal annual net cash flows of $30,000, and Location 2 is expected to have the following unequal annual net cash flows: Year 1 $59,000 Year 2 44,000 29,000 Year 3 Year 4 18,000 Year...
Ranking Investment Proposals: Payback Period, Accounting Rate of Return, and Net Present Value Presented is information pertaining to the cash flows of three mutually exclusive investment proposals: Proposal X Proposal Y Proposal Z Initial investment $98,000 $98,000 $98,000 Cash flow from operations Year 1 90,000 49,000 98,000 Year 2 8,000 49,000 Year 3 49,000 49,000 Disinvestment 0 0 0 Life (years) 3 years 3 years 1 year (a) Select the best investment proposal using the payback period, the accounting rate...
Information on four investment proposals is given below: Investment required Present value of cash inflows Investment Proposal Α D $(90,000) $ (100,000) $ ( 70,000) $ (120,000) 126,000 138,000 105,000 160,000 $ 36,000 $ 38,000 $ 35,000 $ 40,000 5 years 7 years 6 years 6 years Net present value Life of the project Required: 1. Compute the project profitability index for each investment proposal. (Round your answers to 2 decimal places.) 2. Rank the proposals in terms of preference....