Question

-NM PR 11-6B Capital rationing decision for a service company involving Obj. 2, 3,5 four proposals Clearcast Communications IIncome from Operations Net Cash Flow Investment Year Proposal C: $320,000 AwN- Proposal D: $ 36,000 26,000 26,000 16,000 16,0The companys capital rationing policy requires a maximum cash payback period of three years. In addition, a minimum average

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1
Investment Year Income from Operations Net CFs Cumulative CFs Payback Period ARoR
Proposal A $              450,000 1 $                 30,000 $      120,000 $          120,000 Average profit/Investment
2 $                      30,000 $      120,000 $          240,000 (60000/5)/450000
3 $                      20,000 $      110,000 $          350,000
4 $                      10,000 $      100,000 $          450,000
5 $                    (30,000) $         60,000
$                      60,000 $      510,000 4 years 2.67%
Proposal B $              200,000 1 $                      60,000 $      100,000 $          100,000
2 $                      40,000 $         80,000 $          180,000 =2 years + (200000-180000)/60000 *12
3 $                      20,000 $         60,000 $          240,000
4 $                    (10,000) $         30,000
5 $                    (20,000) $         20,000
$                      90,000 $      290,000 2 years, 4 months 9.00%
Proposal C $              320,000 1 $                      36,000 $      100,000 $          100,000
2 $                      26,000 $         90,000 $          190,000
3 $                      26,000 $         90,000 $          280,000 =3 years+40000/80000*12
4 $                      16,000 $         80,000 $          360,000
5 $                      16,000 $         80,000
$                   120,000 $      440,000 3 years, 6 months 7.50%
Proposal D $              540,000 1 $                      92,000 $      200,000 $          200,000
2 $                      72,000 $      180,000 $          380,000
3 $                      52,000 $      160,000 $          540,000
4 $                      12,000 $      120,000
5 $                       (8,000) $      100,000
$                   220,000 $      760,000 3 years 8.15%

INote : Income from Operations were given effect to depreciation for each proposal already.

Proposal Payback period (max 3 years) Average Rate of return (>12%) Accept for further analysis Reject
A 4 years 2.67% r
B 2 years, 4 months 9.00% a
C 3 years, 6 months 7.50% r
D 3 years 8.15% a

Calculation of NPV

Net CFs PV of cash flows
Year Proposal A Proposal B Proposal C Proposal D PVF @ 12% Proposal A Proposal B Proposal C Proposal D
1 $ 120,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 0.8929 $       107,143 $         89,286 $         89,286 $       178,571
2 $ 120,000 $    80,000 $    90,000 $ 180,000 0.7972 $         95,663 $         63,776 $         71,747 $       143,495
3 $ 110,000 $    60,000 $    90,000 $ 160,000 0.7118 $         78,296 $         42,707 $         64,060 $       113,885
4 $ 100,000 $    30,000 $    80,000 $ 120,000 0.6355 $         63,552 $         19,066 $         50,841 $         76,262
5 $    60,000 $    20,000 $    80,000 $ 100,000 0.5674 $         34,046 $         11,349 $         45,394 $         56,743
$ 510,000 $ 290,000 $ 440,000 $ 760,000 $      378,699 $      226,182 $      321,329 $      568,956
Less : Investment $       450,000 $      200,000 $      320,000 $       540,000
NPV $       (71,301) $         26,182 $           1,329 $         28,956
PV Index/Profitability index
(PV of CFs/Investment) $             0.84 $             1.13 $             1.00 $             1.05

Ranking :

NPV Ranking PV Index/Profitability index Ranking
Proposal A $                        (71,301) 4 0.84 4
Proposal B $                          26,182 2 1.13 1
Proposal C $                            1,329 3 1.00 3
Proposal D $                          28,956 1 1.05 2

Note: Rank 1 - Most Attractive
Rank 4 - Least attractive

8. NPV ranks proposal 4 as most attractive while PV index ranks proposal 2 as most attractive. NPV measures only the profitability of a proposed project/investment. Also, more NPV does not necessarily mean the return on investment is good. Ranking on the basis of more surplus or less surplus without taking into account the amount of investment that goes into the project, is flawed during capital rationing which is why we calculate Profitability index that measures the PV of benefits for every dollar of investment. Therefore, the company should invest its limited capital based on the PI ranking of every proposal.


Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
-NM PR 11-6B Capital rationing decision for a service company involving Obj. 2, 3,5 four proposals...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Gro...

    Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...

  • Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating...

    Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Clearcast Communications Inc. is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated Operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $450,000 1 $30,000 $120,000 2    30,000   120,000 3    20,000   110,000 4    10,000   100,000 5   (30,000)    60,000 $60,000 $510,000 Proposal B: $200,000 1 $60,000 $100,000 2    40,000     80,000...

  • Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...

    Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...

  • Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...

    Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...

  • Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating...

    Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated income from operations, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Income from Operations Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1...

  • Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering alloc...

    Capital Rationing Decision for a Service Company Involving Four Proposals Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000...

  • Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals....

    Renaissance Capital Group is considering allocating a limited amount of capital investment funds among four proposals. The amount of proposed investment, estimated operating income, and net cash flow for each proposal are as follows: Investment Year Operating Income Net Cash Flow Proposal A: $680,000 1 $ 64,000 $ 200,000 2    64,000    200,000 3    64,000    200,000 4    24,000    160,000 5    24,000    160,000 $240,000 $ 920,000 Proposal B: $320,000 1 $ 26,000 $ 90,000 2    26,000     90,000 3      6,000     70,000 4      6,000...

  • Cash Payback period for a Service Company Jane's Clothing Inc. is evaluating two capital investment proposals...

    Cash Payback period for a Service Company Jane's Clothing Inc. is evaluating two capital investment proposals for a retail outlet, each requiring an investment of $150,000 and each with an eight-year life and expected total net cash flows of $240,000. Location 1 is expected to provide equal annual net cash flows of $30,000, and Location 2 is expected to have the following unequal annual net cash flows: Year 1 $59,000 Year 2 44,000 29,000 Year 3 Year 4 18,000 Year...

  • Ranking Investment Proposals: Payback Period, Accounting Rate of Return, and Net Present Value Pr...

    Ranking Investment Proposals: Payback Period, Accounting Rate of Return, and Net Present Value Presented is information pertaining to the cash flows of three mutually exclusive investment proposals: Proposal X Proposal Y Proposal Z Initial investment $98,000 $98,000 $98,000 Cash flow from operations Year 1 90,000 49,000 98,000 Year 2 8,000 49,000 Year 3 49,000 49,000 Disinvestment 0 0 0 Life (years) 3 years 3 years 1 year (a) Select the best investment proposal using the payback period, the accounting rate...

  • Information on four investment proposals is given below: Investment required Present value of cash inflows Investment...

    Information on four investment proposals is given below: Investment required Present value of cash inflows Investment Proposal Α D $(90,000) $ (100,000) $ ( 70,000) $ (120,000) 126,000 138,000 105,000 160,000 $ 36,000 $ 38,000 $ 35,000 $ 40,000 5 years 7 years 6 years 6 years Net present value Life of the project Required: 1. Compute the project profitability index for each investment proposal. (Round your answers to 2 decimal places.) 2. Rank the proposals in terms of preference....

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT