a) Counts has no meaning as it is just a number whereas percentage can be used for comparison when the number of people in the groups are not same.
b) There are 1550274 babies.
c)
d) Median class is 20-24 since this group divides the whole data in two equal parts.
ooc smary. noW does it reflect the skewness of the distribution Maternal age at childbirth. How...
14. Select the number of participants in the Beck & Watson study Group of answer choices 8 13 22 35 15. Beck & Watson determined their final sample size via Group of answer choices coding saturation triangulation ethnography 16.Through their study, Beck & Watson determined Group of answer choices after a traumatic birth, subsequent births have no troubling effects after a traumatic birth, subsequent births brought fear, terror, anxiety, and dread Subsequent Childbirth After a Previous Traumatic Birth Beck, Cheryl...
10. The Beck & Watson article is a Group of answer choices quantitative study qualitative study 11. Beck & Watson examined participants' experiences and perceptions using what type of research design? Group of answer choices particpant obersvation phenomenology 12. Select the participants in the Beck & Watson study Group of answer choices Caucasian women with 2-4 children Caucasian pregnant women 13. In the Beck & Watson study, data was collected via a(n) Group of answer choices internet study focus group...
All of the following questions are in relation to the following journal article which is available on Moodle: Parr CL, Magnus MC, Karlstad O, Holvik K, Lund-Blix NA, Jaugen M, et al. Vitamin A and D intake in pregnancy, infant supplementation and asthma development: the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 2018:107:789-798 QUESTIONS: 1. State one hypothesis the author's proposed in the manuscript. 2. There is previous research that shows that adequate Vitamin A intake is required...
Please read and answer the following questions. 1. How was the sample selected ? We’re demographics collected ? 2. Is the sample representative of the target population? If not how was the sample “improved “ to make the results more reliable and valid? 3. What is the design of the study? 4. How were the human subjects protected ? 5. Were instruments used reliable and valid ? Did they measure the phenomenon under the study( how do you know that...