Question

5. Which of the following statements regarding a negligence case is correct? a. A plaintiff must show that the defendants ac
a. A plaintiff does not have to show that the defendant s act either created a foreseeable danger or that the act was the fa
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

a. is correct.

A plaintiff must show that the defendant's act was both the factual cause of her injury as well as a foreseeable injury, to prove negligence.

It is not enough to just show that defendant's act was the factual cause of her injury even if the injury was not foreseeable.

It is not enough to show that defendant's act created a foreseeable danger even if it was not the factual cause of her injury.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
5. Which of the following statements regarding a negligence case is correct? a. A plaintiff must...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • SECTION 1: TRUE/FALSE, CHOOSE YOUR ANSWER BY CIRCLING 1. 2. In negligence, the tour elements of...

    SECTION 1: TRUE/FALSE, CHOOSE YOUR ANSWER BY CIRCLING 1. 2. In negligence, the tour elements of negligenoe that need to be proved by a plaintif are 3. In all defamation of character cases, one of the elements that the Plaintiff must prove is that the 4. A party can be liable for defamation for truthful statements if the statement hurts the plainei's 5. Tort law is concerned with compensation to a person who has suffered personal injury andior 6. The...

  • The defense of comparative negligence states: Multiple Choice 0 a defendant must prove he or she...

    The defense of comparative negligence states: Multiple Choice 0 a defendant must prove he or she was exercising reasonable care as compared to others under the circumstances 0 a plaintiff can assess his or her damages by comparing what other similarly situated plaintiffs have received in other negligence lawsuits, 0 all defendants in a negligence lawsuit are jointly and severally liable for the injury 0 plaintiff is barred from recovery for a defendant's negligence if the plaintiff is in any...

  • A plaintiff who sues under res ipsa loquitur must show that A. An event occurred which...

    A plaintiff who sues under res ipsa loquitur must show that A. An event occurred which would not normally occur in the absence of negligence B. The defendant intended to cause the harm suffered by the plaintiff C. Other possible causes have been eliminated by the evidence D. None of the above

  • Book: BUSINESS LAW, Text and Cases Volume I, Clarkson, Miller, & Cross Write summary 20 sentences....

    Book: BUSINESS LAW, Text and Cases Volume I, Clarkson, Miller, & Cross Write summary 20 sentences. Chapter 7 Negligence and Strict Liability Negligence involves acts that depart from a reasonable standard of care, creating an unreasonable risk of harm to others. Strict liability is liability for injury imposed for reasons other than fault.           Negligence                                     Negligence: Failing to exercise the standard of care that a reasonable person would exercise in similar circumstances. n         In contrast to intentional...

  • 22. Early in the trial of Fuel Corporation's suit against Gas Stations, Inc., the attorneys engag...

    22. Early in the trial of Fuel Corporation's suit against Gas Stations, Inc., the attorneys engage in voir dire. This is a. b. c. A hearing before the judge to determine the legal issues to be argued. A review by both attorneys of the evidentiary exhibits. A proceeding for selection of jurors. d. Opening statements 23. Irma files a suit against Jim. In order to obtain a favorable jury verdict, Irma must prove her case a. Beyond a reasonable doubt....

  • 1. In a negligence case, to show that the tortfeasor’s conduct was the proximate cause of...

    1. In a negligence case, to show that the tortfeasor’s conduct was the proximate cause of their injuries, the injured party must show that: A. But-for the tortfeasor’s conduct, the injury would not have occurred. B. There is a causal link between the tortfeasor’s conduct and the injury. C. That the tortfeasor owed a special duty of care to the injured party. D. That the injury was a foreseeable result of tortfeasor’s negligence conduct. 2. U.S company ABC Company agrees...

  • Question 5 1 pts Which of the following statements is the BEST answer with respect to...

    Question 5 1 pts Which of the following statements is the BEST answer with respect to Sex Discrimination under Title VII? In order for a Title VIl action to succeed, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant's actions were severe OR pervasive, not that the defendant's actions were severe AND pervasive. O O A supervisor who conducts a consensual office affair with an employee he supervises, and confers certain benefits upon her because of it, will always subject his company...

  • QUESTION 29 Which of the following is a correct statement regarding intentional torts and negligent torts?...

    QUESTION 29 Which of the following is a correct statement regarding intentional torts and negligent torts? Both intentional torts and negligent torts involve the failure to exercise reasonable care to protect another's person or property. Negligent torts result from a person willfully taking actions that are likely to cause injury, while intentional torts involve the failure to exercise reasonable care to protect another's person or property. Both intentional torts and negligent torts result from a person willfully taking actions that...

  • 2 pts Question 1 One of the advantages of suing in tort as opposed to contract...

    2 pts Question 1 One of the advantages of suing in tort as opposed to contract for a products liability action is: In tort actions, the plaintiff need not have purchased the product. In tort actions, the plaintiff need not prove that the product is defective. In contract actions, the plaintiff must prove that personal Injury resulted from the use of defective product. In contract actions, the plaintiff must prove that the seller breached a duty of care. Question 2...

  • Brief Fact Summary. Two women brought lawsuits against West Virginia University Hospital, claiming they were injured...

    Brief Fact Summary. Two women brought lawsuits against West Virginia University Hospital, claiming they were injured as a result of negligent treatment received at the hospital. The trial court did not allow the women to present evidence to support their claims that the doctors who treated them appeared to be hospital employees, when they were actually independent contractors. Synopsis of Rule of Law. A hospital may be found vicariously liable for the negligence a doctor working at the hospital is...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT