. Based on Table 1, how well did the authors' control of confounding work?
Based on Table 1, how well did the authors’ control of confounding work?
A. Very well; there were no statistically significant differences between the Digoxin and Placebo groups
B. Moderately well; it would have been better if they had matched on primary care of CHF
C. Poorly; there were several significant differences showing up in Table 1
D. It’s impossible to judge based on Table 1
D. It's impossible to judge based on Table
Answer should be A because from the table we do not encounter any statistically significant differences differe the patients for Digoxin group and Placebo effect. The differences sre mutually less than one.
. Based on Table 1, how well did the authors' control of confounding work? Based on...
In Table 1, approximately what percentage of each treatment group was Caucasian? A. 30% B. 51% C. 85% D. The answer is not easily available from Table 1. TABLE 1. BASE-LINE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE STUDY PATIENTS ACCORDING TO TREATMENT GROUP. DIGOXIN N-3397) 63.4 11.0 28.6+8.9 PLACEBC (N= 3403) Age (yr)-mean ±SD Ejection fraction- mean +SD Median duration of CHFmo 63.5108 28.4+8.9 % of patients Female sex Nonwhite race Age >70 yr Method of assessing ejection 22.2 22.5 26.7 65.0 29.5...