Question

At the beginning of 2015, a construction company changed from the completed-contract method to the percentage-of-completion m

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

2013 -. Accouting income is more than the tax income. Hence , deferred tax asste will be arise i.e. 170000 [(475000-900000)*0.4].

2014 - accounting income is more than the tax income. Hence DTA will be arise i.e. 30000 [(625000-700000)*0.4].

$200000 will be the amount debited in construction process account to record the change at the beginning of 2015

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
At the beginning of 2015, a construction company changed from the completed-contract method to the percentage-of-completion...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • d. none UI ile dov. 23.During 2018, a construction company changed from the completed-contract method to...

    d. none UI ile dov. 23.During 2018, a construction company changed from the completed-contract method to the percentage- of-completion method for accounting purposes but not for tax purposes. Gross profit figures under both methods for the past three years appear below: Completed-Contract Percentage-of-Completion $ 800,000 2016 $ 475,000 950,000 2017 625,000 2018 1.050,000 700.000 S1.800.000 $2.800.000 Assuming an income tax rate of 40% for all years, the effect of this accounting change on prior periods should be reported by a...

  • At the beginning of 2017, Culver Construction Company changed from the completed-contract method to recognizing revenue...

    At the beginning of 2017, Culver Construction Company changed from the completed-contract method to recognizing revenue over time (percentage-of-completion) for financial reporting purposes. The company will continue to use the completed-contract method for tax purposes. For years prior to 2017, pretax income under the two methods was as follows: percentage-of-completion $110,500, and completed-contract $72,300. The tax rate is 30%. Prepare Culver’s 2017 journal entry to record the change in accounting principle. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is...

  • At the beginning of 2017, Stellar Construction Company changed from the completed-contract method to recognizing revenue...

    At the beginning of 2017, Stellar Construction Company changed from the completed-contract method to recognizing revenue over time (percentage-of-completion) for financial reporting purposes. The company will continue to use the completed-contract method for tax purposes. For years prior to 2017, pretax income under the two methods was as follows: percentage-of-completion $114,200, and completed-contract $79,400. The tax rate is 40%. Prepare Stellar’s 2017 journal entry to record the change in accounting principle. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when amount is...

  • At the beginning of 2018, a construction company that began operations in 2016 changed from the...

    At the beginning of 2018, a construction company that began operations in 2016 changed from the completed-contract method to the percentage-of-completion method for accounting purposes but not for tax purposes. Gross profit figures under both methods for the past three years appear below: Completed-Contract Percentage-of-Completion 2016 $ 950,000 $ 1,800,000 2017 1,250,000 1,900,000 2018 1,400,000 2,100,000 Assuming an income tax rate of 30% for all years, the effect of this accounting change on prior periods should be reported by f...

  • Tamarisk Construction Company changed from the completed-contract to the percentage-of-completion method of accounting for long-term construction...

    Tamarisk Construction Company changed from the completed-contract to the percentage-of-completion method of accounting for long-term construction contracts during 2018. For tax purposes, the company employs the completed-contract method and will continue this approach in the future. (Hint: Adjust all tax consequences through the Deferred Tax Liability account.) The appropriate information related to this change is as follows. Pretax Income from: Percentage-of-Completion Completed-Contract Difference 2017 $714,000 $647,000 $67,000 2018 642,000 512,000 130,000 (a) Assuming that the tax rate is 30%, what...

  • Blue Construction Company, which began operations in 2017, changed from the completed-contract to...

    Blue Construction Company, which began operations in 2017, changed from the completed-contract to the percentage-of-completion method of accounting for long-term construction contracts during 2018. For tax purposes, the company employs the completed-contract method and will continue this approach in the future. The appropriate information related to this change is as follows. Pretax Income from Percentage-of-Completion Completed-Contract Difference 2017 $966,000 $600,000 $366,000 2018 906,000 434,000 472,000 (a) Assuming that the tax rate is 35%, what is the amount of net income...

  • 2. During Year 3, Dream Home, Inc. changed to the percentage-of-completion method for financial purposes. It...

    2. During Year 3, Dream Home, Inc. changed to the percentage-of-completion method for financial purposes. It will continue to use the completed contract method for tax purposes. Income before taxes under both the methods for Years 1 and 2 are as follows: Completed-Contract Percentage-of-Completion Year 1 $100,000 $180,000 Year 2 $200,000 $250,000 Prepare the journal entry(ies) to change to the percentage-of-completion method. Assume an income tax rate of 20%

  • Percentage of Completion Problem: The Nifty Construction Company entered into a long-term contract in 2013. The...

    Percentage of Completion Problem: The Nifty Construction Company entered into a long-term contract in 2013. The contract price was $1,600,000, and the company initially estimated the total cost of the project to be $1,150,000. The following data pertains to the three years that the contract was in process: 2013 2014 2015 $224,000 $936,000 $1,280,000 Costs incurred to date Estimated costs to complete Billings to date Collections to date 896,000 264,000 0 200,000 1,200,000 1,600,00 170,000 1,070,000 1,500000 Using the percentage...

  • Ex. 18-127-Percentage-of-completion and completed-contract methods. On February 1, 2012, Marsh Contractors agreed to construct a building...

    Ex. 18-127-Percentage-of-completion and completed-contract methods. On February 1, 2012, Marsh Contractors agreed to construct a building at a contract price of $5,400,000. Marsh estimated total construction costs would be $4,000,000 and the project would be finished in 2014. Information relating to the costs and billings for this contract is as follows: 2014 2012 $1,500,000 2,500,000 2,200,000 2,000,000 2013 $4,600,000 $2,640,000 1,760,000 4,000,000 3,500,000 Total costs incurred to date Estimated costs to complete Customer billings to date Collections to date -0-...

  • Exercise 22-1 Monty Construction any changed from the comed-contract to the percent method and will continue...

    Exercise 22-1 Monty Construction any changed from the comed-contract to the percent method and will continue this proach in the future. Ad alta com of completion method of e s through the Deferred to using for long-term construction s account. The programmation 2018 For de change the c ente r s Pretax income from Percentage of Completed Completion Contract 5727.000 $561.000 640.000 490,000 Difference 1.000 190.000 (a) Assuming that the tax is 04. What is the amount of income that...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT