Suppose Clorox can lease a new computer data processing system for 971,000 per year for five years. Alternately it can purchase the system for 4.22 million. Assume Clorox has a borrowing cost of 6.7% and a tax rate of 35% and the system will be obsolete at the end of two years.
A. If Clorox will depreciate the computer equipment on a straight line basis over the next five years, and if the lease qualifies a true tax lease qualifies as a true tax lease. Is it better to lease or finance the purchase of the equipment?
B. Suppose that if Clorox buys the equipment, it will use accelerated depreciation for tax purposes. Specifically, suppose it can expense 20% of the purchase price immediately and can take depreciation equal to 32%, 19.2%, 11.5%, 11.52% and 5.76% of the purchase price over the next five years. Compare leasing with purchase in this lease.
C. If Clorox buys the equipment it will pay 4.22 million upfront and have depreciation expenses of ____ per year, and generating a depreciation tax shield of____per year for years 1-5
Please if you can break this down step by step, and also this question has 12 parts. Thank You
Sol A: True Tax lease basically means that the Lessee in our Case Clorox can take benefit for Tax Purposes of Lease Rent expense only. The Lessor can take benefit of Depreciation for Tax Purposes. Thus, while comparing leasing with buying option in this case. The Basic outflows in Leasing will be Lease Rent and the only inflow will be Tax Saving on Lease Rent expense i.e. 35% of Lease Rental (971000*0.35=339850). The purchase option on the other hand will have an initial outflow of 4.22 mn and a Net Interest (6.70%(1-0.35)=4.36% of Purchase Cost. The inflows will be depreciation as it is a non cash expense and Tax Savings of 35% of Depreciation Expense. This will then enable us to compare both the options in which Buying Option is the Benifiticial Option for Clorox. The Cash Flows are as under:
Time | Type | Cash Flow Leasing | Cash Flow Purchase |
0 | Purchase | 0 | -4220000 |
1 | Lease Rent | -971000 | 0 |
1 | Depreciation | 844000 | |
1 | Interest Cost | 0 | -183781 |
1 | Tax Shield | 339850 | 295400 |
2 | Lease Rent | -971000 | 0 |
2 | Depreciation | 0 | 844000 |
2 | Interest Cost | 0 | -183781 |
2 | Tax Shield | 339850 | 295400 |
3 | Lease Rent | -971000 | 0 |
3 | Depreciation | 0 | 844000 |
3 | Interest Cost | 0 | -183781 |
3 | Tax Shield | 339850 | 295400 |
4 | Lease Rent | -971000 | 0 |
4 | Depreciation | 0 | 844000 |
4 | Interest Cost | 0 | -183781 |
4 | Tax Shield | 339850 | 295400 |
5 | Lease Rent | -971000 | 0 |
5 | Depreciation | 0 | 844000 |
5 | Interest Cost | 0 | -183781 |
5 | Tax Shield | 339850 | 295400 |
Total Cost | -3155750 | 558095 |
Sol B. The question should have been as non tax lease as with true tax lease the benefit of depreciation is going to the lessor and not to Clorox who is Lessee. Thus the Cash flow calculations are given below and we have left the interest cost delebritely so to just see what impact that accelerated Depreciation has on Buying the Process. It is having a positive impact calculated as under:-
Time | Type | Cash Flows Leasing | Cash Flows Buying | W No 1 | ||
0 | Buying | 0 | -4220000 | Depreciation Schedule | ||
0 | Dep @ 20% | 0 | 844000 | Buying Cost | 4220000 | |
0 | Tax Shield | 0 | 295400 | Time 0 @ 20% | -844000 | |
1 | Lease Rent | -971000 | 0 | Balance at end of Year 0 | 3376000 | |
1 | Dep @ 32% | 0 | 1350400 | Time 1 @ 32% | -1350400 | |
1 | Tax Shield | 339850 | 472640 | Balance at the end of Year 1 | 2025600 | |
1 | Lease Rent | -971000 | 0 | Time 2 @ 19.2% | -810240 | |
1 | Dep @ 19.2% | 0 | 810240 | Balance at the end of Year 2 | 1215360 | |
1 | Tax Shield | 339850 | 283584 | Time 3 @ 11.5% | -485300 | |
1 | Lease Rent | -971000 | 0 | Balance at the end of Year 3 | 730060 | |
1 | Dep @ 11.50% | 0 | 485300 | Time 4 @ 11.52% | -486144 | |
1 | Tax Shield | 339850 | 169855 | Balance at the end of Year 4 | 243916 | |
1 | Lease Rent | -971000 | 0 | Time 5 @ 5.76% | -243072 | |
1 | Dep @ 11.52% | 0 | 486144 | Balance at the end of Year 5 | 844 | |
1 | Tax Shield | 339850 | 170150.4 | |||
1 | Lease Rent | -971000 | 0 | |||
1 | Dep @ 5.76% | 0 | 243072 | |||
1 | Tax Shield | 339850 | 85075.2 | |||
Total Cost | -3155750 | 1475860.6 |
Sol C. Depreciation Expenses on Straight Line basis is 844000 per year and Depreciation Tax Shield is 35% of this expense as 295400. The calculation is as under:
W No 1 | Depreciation | |||
Cost of Purchase | 4220000 | |||
Term Years | 5 | |||
SLM | 844000 | Dep / Year | ||
W No 2 | Tax Shield | Tax (No Dep / Int) | ||
Suppose PBDIT | 1000000 | 1000000 | ||
Depreciation | 844000 | 0 | ||
Interest | 0 | 0 | ||
PBT | 156000 | 1000000 | ||
Tax @ 35% | 54600 | 350000 | ||
Thus Tax Shield | 295400 | or 35% of Depreciation | ||
Suppose Clorox can lease a new computer data processing system for 971,000 per year for five...
Suppose Amazon is considering the purchase of computer servers and network infrastructure to expand its very successful businesses offering cloud-based computing. In total it will purchase 48.7 million in new equipment. The equipment will qualify for accelerated depreciation 20% can be expensed immediately followed by 32%, 19.2%, 11.52%, 11.52% and 5.76% over the next five years. However because of the firm's substantial. Amazon considers leasing the equipment instead suppose Amazon and the lessor face the same 7.8% borrowing rate, but...
Suppse Netflix is considering the purchase of a computer servers and network infrastructure to facilitate its move into video on demand services. In total, it will purchase $48.1 million in new equipment. This equipment will qualify for accelerated depreciation: 20% can be expensed immediately, followed by 32%, 19.2%, 11.52%, 11.52%, and 5.76% over the next 5 years. However, because of the firms substantial loss carryforwards, Netflix estimates ita marginal tax rate to be 10% over the next 5 years, so...
Rearden Metal is considering the purchase of a new blast furnace costing a total of $5 million dollars. This furnace will qualify for accelerated depreciation: 20% can be expense immediately, followed by 32%, 19.2%, 11.52%, 11.52% and 5.76% over the next five years. However, because of Rearden's substantial tax loss carry forwards, Rearden estimates its marginal tax rate to be only 10% over the next five years. Since Rearden will get very little tax benefit from the depreciation expense, they...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer- assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide $3.1 million in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs $8.1 million and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over five years. Wildcat's tax rate is 21 percent and the firm can borrow at 6 percent. Lambert's policy is to require...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide $2.3 million in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs $8.2 million and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over five years. Wildcat's tax rate is 24 percent, and the firm can borrow at 6 percent. Lambert Leasing Company is willing to...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide $3.3 million in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs $8.3 million and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over five years. Wildcat’s tax rate is 23 percent and the firm can borrow at 8 percent. Lambert’s policy is to require its...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide $3.4 million in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs $7.5 million and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over five years. Wildcat's tax rate is 24 percent, and the firm can borrow at 8 percent. Lambert Leasing Company has offered to...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide $2.4 million in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs $7.1 million and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over five years. Wildcat's tax rate is 23 percent, and the firm can borrow at 8 percent. Lambert Leasing Company has offered to...
The Wildcat Oil Company is trying to decide whether to lease or buy a new computer-assisted drilling system for its oil exploration business. Management has decided that it must use the system to stay competitive; it will provide $3.7 million in annual pretax cost savings. The system costs $8.8 million and will be depreciated straight-line to zero over its five-year life, after which it will be worthless. Wildcat’s tax rate is 22 percent and the firm can borrow at 9...
MACRS, or the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System is the current tax depreciation system in the US. It assigns a schedule for yearly depreciation, depending on the type of property. Assume you are considering the purchase of a new $1756 laptop. Computers are to be depreciated as follows: 20% in year 1, 32% in year 2, 19.2% in year 3, 11.52% in years 4 and 5, and the final 5.76% in year 6. How much will your computer have been...