Question

After reading the operative report below, provide a complete response and codes to the questions that...

After reading the operative report below, provide a complete response and codes to the questions that follow.

Findings: The patient had a superficial wound dehiscence with exposure of his leads. He had a small area of lead fraying on lead one. After the leads were freed up from the scar and the pocket, that showed one area of lead dropout on interrogation.

The patient was taken to the operating room and placed in the supine position. General endotracheal anesthesia was obtained. The patient had the usual monitors placed. The patient was then rolled prone onto the Jackson OSI table. All of the soft tissue areas were well padded. The patient had the usual monitors placed. He then had the chest wound for the new generator site identified with the incision identified using C-arm fluoroscopy in the AP plane and the course of the lead was followed and the lead was planned to be explanted at a new level and then reconnected to the generator, which would be disconnected from the lead to the present location pocket. The patient had a timeout done per protocol confirming the correct patient, correct procedure, and all equipment that was necessary from the Boston Scientific pacemaker rep. The patient then had the incisions injected with local and the initial incision was made over the area where the generator was. Sharp dissection was used to get down to the generator layer, and bipolar cautery was used for hemostasis. The leads were dissected free from the superficial aspect of the incision and then the area of the generator was exposed, and the generator was explanted and then it was disconnected from the leads, and the temporary stoppers were placed in the lead holes on the generator and secured and then the generator was placed in antibiotic solution. The area of the leads was then inspected and noted to be markedly scarred in the pocket where they had been positioned behind the generator. These were dissected free using the Bovie cautery on cutting mode and, once the leads had been freed up from all the scar, the new pocket was made hemostatic and was irrigated out. The leads were then exposed through the other incision for the new generator site. This was placed approximately 5 in. above the present site and then, once the leads had been identified in the depth of the new incision, they were mobilized and dissected free and then mobilized up to the new incision and then wrapped in an antibiotic soaked lap. The new pocket was created using a Bovie cautery and the Army-Navy retractors and, once hemostasis was obtained using the suction cautery, the area was irrigated out and then the old generator site was irrigated out. Then the generator was brought up after we had changed our gloves on the field and then the generator had the stoppers removed and the leads were then placed in their usual positions. The generator was placed halfway in the pocket and then interrogated by the Boston Scientific rep, and the #1 lead was noted to have one area of dropout but otherwise was functioning well. This was consistent with a small area of fraying of the lead with the bulk of the lead intact. The leads were then tightened and then reinterrogated with otherwise good function noted, normal impedances, and then the excess lead was placed behind the generator in the pocket. Then the pocket was irrigated out again with Vancomycin antibiotic solution and, once both pockets had been irrigated out, the wound was closed in multiple layers and the skin was ultimately closed with staples at both sites. The patient then had the wounds cleaned off and dressed and the patient was then rolled supine and extubated and brought back to the recovery room alert and moving all extremities.

Questions

•    Based on your review of the operative report, what is the objective of the procedures performed today?
•    Based on your review of the operative report, what two approaches are used for this report?
•    Based on your review of the operative report, identify the two codes needed to reflect the work performed on the leads.
•    Identify the code that would be used to report the insertion of the pulse generator.
•    Identify the code for the interrogation of the pacemaker.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

..c-arm fluroscopy in the AP plane, bipolar cautery was used for hemostasis..

..Bovie cautery and Army -navy retractor.

..Boston scientific pacemaker rep CPT code 33224

C- arm fluroscopy in the AP plane CPT code 76001

... Insertion of pulse generator CPT code 33212

...interrogation of the pacemaker CPT code 93288

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
After reading the operative report below, provide a complete response and codes to the questions that...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Please assign the correct ICD-10-PCS codes to the following operative report: PROCEDURE: Placement of a dual...

    Please assign the correct ICD-10-PCS codes to the following operative report: PROCEDURE: Placement of a dual chamber implantable pacing cardioverter-defibrillator INDICATIONS: Patient with moderate ischemic cardiomyopathy, prior infarct and stent PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION: After informed consent, the patient is brought to the lab. The procedure was done under conscious sedation fluoroscopic guidance. One percent Lidocaine was used to anesthetize the skin under the left clavicle, and a skin incision was made. A pocket was made for the ICD generator and leads...

  • I need help with the diagnosis code and CPT code with this outpatient case: Case is...

    I need help with the diagnosis code and CPT code with this outpatient case: Case is in pdf format that is why just copying the procedure. Let me know how to copy pdf format too. Case:410021 (VLab) Sex:Female Female Patient Age:65 DATE OF SERVICE: 05/30/2014 PREOPERATIVEDIAGNOSIS: POSTOPERATIVEDIAGNOSIS: Intractable epilepsy. OPERATIONPERFORMED: Replacement of a VNS generator for vagal nerve stimulator with intraoperative interrogation of device. SURGEON: The attending and surgeon is Dr. ASSISTANTSURGEON: ANESTHESIOLOGIST: ASSISTANTANESTHESIOLOGIST: ANESTHESIA: POSTOPERATIVEDIAGNOSIS: Intractable epilepsy. INDICATIONS: The...

  • Thank you. Code(s): Operative Report #2 Operative Report Breast carcinoma Preoperative Diagnosis: Postoperative Diagnosis: Operation: Same...

    Thank you. Code(s): Operative Report #2 Operative Report Breast carcinoma Preoperative Diagnosis: Postoperative Diagnosis: Operation: Same Removal of venous access port The patient is a 44-year-old woman who had a left, modified radical mastectomy in 2010. In August she had a Port-a-cath placed in the right side. However it has caused an extreme amount of discomfort, so she has requested that it be removed. The patient was taken to the OR and placed in a supine position on the table....

  • code the following three operative reports assigning the appropriate CPT and ICD-10-CM codes and modifiers. PREOPERATIVE...

    code the following three operative reports assigning the appropriate CPT and ICD-10-CM codes and modifiers. PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Appendicitis. POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Appendicitis, nonperforated. PROCEDURE PERFORMED: Appendectomy. ANESTHESIA: General endotracheal. PROCEDURE: After informed consent was obtained, the patient was brought to the operative suite and placed supine on the operating table. General endotracheal anesthesia was induced without incident. The patient was prepped and draped in the usual sterile manner. A transverse right lower quadrant incision was made directly over the point of...

  • Operative Report PRE- AND POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Hydrocele ANESTHESIA: General Under general anesthesia, this 36-year-old male was...

    Operative Report PRE- AND POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Hydrocele ANESTHESIA: General Under general anesthesia, this 36-year-old male was prepped and draped in the usual fashion. After placing the patient in the lithotomy position, a 3.5-cm incision was made in the left marsupium and a hydrocele was visualized. Hemostasis was achieved. The hydrocele was located in the tunica vaginalis and was dissected and brought through the incision site. The hydrocele was surgically excised, and a drain was placed. The wound was closed in...

  • Please assign the correct ICD-10-PCS codes to the following operative report: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Intractable epilepsy. POSTOPERATIVE...

    Please assign the correct ICD-10-PCS codes to the following operative report: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Intractable epilepsy. POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Intractable epilepsy. PROCEDURE PERFORMED: Craniotomy and anterior 2/3 corpus callosotomy Use of neuronavigation, Brainlab Use of intraoperative microscope INDICATIONS: The patient is a 12-year-old with intractable epilepsy and drop seizures despite multiple antiepileptic drugs. The above procedure was indicated. Informed consent was obtained both verbally and in writing DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: The patient was brought to the operating room. She was intubated and...

  • ICD-10-PCS Codes to the following operative report

    2.   Operative Report(Do not code Fluoroscopy)PREOPERATIVE   DIAGNOSES:Unstable oblique ankle   fracture, right fibulaPOSTOPERATIVE   DIAGNOSES:Unstable oblique ankle   fracture, right fibulaPROCEDURES:Open reduction internal   fixation right ankleANESTHESIA:General endotracheal INDICATIONS: This young man fell at home on the ice and sustained the above fracture. He was brought to the emergency room and was admitted for surgery. OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: The patient was brought to the operating room, placed in the supine position. Appropriate IV access and monitors were placed. Clindamycin 900 mg IV...

  • Please assign the correct ICD-10-PCS codes to the following operative report: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Foreign body on...

    Please assign the correct ICD-10-PCS codes to the following operative report: PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Foreign body on the left little finger at the metacarpal phalangeal joint (broken piece of glass) POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Same OPERATION: Exploration of the MP joint of the left little finger with excision and removal of foreign body (broken pieces of glass) INDICATION OF SURGERY: On June 9, the patient was involved in a motor vehicle accident with a broken windshield. She tried to brace herself with her...

  • Case 4 Preoperative and postoperative diagnosis Painful enlarging right vulvar eyst Operation performed: Excision of right...

    Case 4 Preoperative and postoperative diagnosis Painful enlarging right vulvar eyst Operation performed: Excision of right vulvar cyst Reason for surgery: This 34-year-old female patient has a vulvar cyst that is causing pain and discomfort The patient was taken to the OR and placed in the supine position. IV analgesis was started, and then she has placed in the dorsal lithotomy position. The surgical site was prepared with Lidocaine 1%, and then epinephrine and bicarb was administered. A 20- mm...

  • Questions What is the best way to dissect this operative report in terms of ICD-10-PCS? What...

    Questions What is the best way to dissect this operative report in terms of ICD-10-PCS? What is the root operation(s)? How many root operations are in this operative report? What is the approach? What is the device code? What is the qualifier code? What are the ICD-10-PCS code(s) associated with this question? OPERATION: The patient was identified in the preoperative holding area and taken to the operative suite at which time general anesthesia was induced. He was then placed in...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT