a)
Particulars (in millions) | 2012 | 2013E | 2014E | 2015E | 2016E | 2017E |
Earnings (A) | 388 | 570 | 599 | 629 | 660.4 | |
Dividends (B) | 115 | 160 | 349 | 367 | 385.4 | |
Cost of equity (C) | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% |
Shareholders' fund (D = D0 + A - B) D0 = previous year's Shareholders fund |
4,310 | 4,583 | 4,993 | 5,243 | 5,505 | 5,780 |
Equity charge (E = C * D) | 431 | 458.3 | 499.3 | 524.3 | 550.5 | 578 |
No of shares (F) | 1,380 | 1,380 | 1,380 | 1,380 | 1,380 | 1,380 |
Book Value (D/F) | 3.32 | 3.62 | 3.80 | 3.99 | 4.19 | |
ROCE (A/D) | 8.4% | 11.4% | 11.42% | 11.42% | 11.42% | |
Residual Value (A - E) | (70.3) |
70.7 |
74.7 | 78.5 | 82.4 |
b)
Particulars | 2013E | 2014E | 2015E | 2016E | 2017E |
Book Value (A) | 3.32 | 3.62 | 3.80 | 3.99 | 4.19 |
Residual Earnings (B) | (70.3) | 70.7 | 74.7 | 78.5 | 82.4 |
Book Value growth (A1-A0)*100/A0 A1 = Current year book value A0, = Previous year book value |
9.03% | 4.97% | 5% | 5.01% | |
Residual Earnings growth (B1-B0)*100/B0 B1 = Current year residual earnings B0 = Previous year residual earnings |
-200.57% | 5.66% | 5.09% | 4.97% |
The residual Earnings growth rate for 2014 is (200.57%) because the base is negative in 2013.
c) Value of equity = Book Value2012 *
Value of equity = 4,310 +
Value of equity = 4,340 + (69.60) + 69.31 + 72.50 + 75.44 + 78.4
Value of equity = 4,556.05
Thus value of equity per share = Value of equity/No of shares =4,556.05/1380 = 3.30
d) Current book value = 4,310/1,380 = 2.35
Premium over book value = 3.30 - 2.35 = 0.95/share
Price to book ratio = 3.30/2.35 = 1.40
I THINK THE ANSWER ABOVE ISN'T CORRECT, BECAUSE ROCE IS SUPPOSED TO BE (EARNING(T=1)/BV(T=0)), BUT INSTEAD IN THIS ANSWER IT'S (EARNING(T=1)/BV(T=1)),SEE BOOK FOR CLARIFICATION. MY ANSWER FOR VALUE OF EQUITY/SHARE IS 4.34
o nounouvqus on 10 10 Pony w 10 P 1 uuu E5.3. A Residual Earnings Valuation...
E5.3. A Residual Earnings Valuation (Easy) An analyst presents you with the following pro forma (in millions of dollars) that gives her forecast of earnings and dividends for 2013–2017. She asks you to value the 1,380 million shares outstanding at the end of 2012, when common shareholders' equity stood at $4,310 million. Use a required return for equity of 10 percent in your calculations. 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E 2017E Earnings 388.0 570.0 599.0 629.0 660.4 Dividends 115.0 160.0 349.0 367.0...
Question 2: On November 1, 2019. Mr. Daniel Kim, an individual
stock investor, pays attention to the news that Dongguk Corp, may
report earnings surprise thanks to the booming demand for natural
gas pipe associated with rising shale gas production in the US. In
order to make an investment judgement through a price multiple
comparison method, Mr. Kim chooses to deploy PER (Price-Earnings
Ratio) computed as following: PER per share stock price of Dongguk
Corp. (November 1, 2019) / expected...
Applications E5.9. Residual Earnings Valuation: Black Hills Corp (Easy) Black Hills Corporation is a diversified energy corporation and a public utility holding com- pany. The following gives the firm's earnings per share and dividends per share for the years 2000–2004. 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 EPS DPS BPS 2.39 1.06 3.45 1.12 2.28 1.16 2.00 1.22 1.71 1.24 9.96 Suppose these numbers were given to you at the end of 1999, as forecasts, when the book value per share...
E5.13. Converting Analysts' Forecasts to a Valuation: Nike, Inc. (Medium) Nike reported book value per share of $15.93 at the end of its 2008 fiscal year. Analysts were forecasting earnings of $3.90 per share for 2009 and $4.45 for 2010, and were also forecasting a five-year growth rate in EPS of 13 percent per year. Prepare a five-year pro forma of earnings based on these forecasts and convert the forecasts to a valuation with the added forecast that residual earnings...
10. Corporate valuation model Aa Aa E The corporate valuation model, the price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple approach, and the economic value-added (EVA) approach are some examples of valuation techniques. The corporate valuation model is similar to the dividend-based valuation that you've done in previous problems, but it focuses on a firm's free cash flows (FCFS) instead of its dividends. Some firms don't pay dividends, or their dividends are difficult to forecast. For that reason, some analysts use the corporate valuation model....