What are the Barriers and supporter for the Ecological Framework Model
Ans) The ecological framework is based on evidence that no single factor can explain why some people or groups are at higher risk of interpersonal violence, while others are more protected from it.
- This framework views interpersonal violence as the outcome of interaction among many factors at four levels—the individual, the relationship, the community, and the societal.
- At the individual level, personal history and biological
factors influence how individuals behave and increase their
likelihood of becoming a victim or a perpetrator of violence. Among
these factors are being a victim of child maltreatment,
psychological or personality disorders, alcohol and/or substance
abuse and a history of behaving aggressively or having experienced
abuse.
- Personal relationships such as family, friends, intimate partners
and peers may influence the risks of becoming a victim or
perpetrator of violence. For example, having violent friends may
influence whether a young person engages in or becomes a victim of
violence.
- Community contexts in which social relationships occur, such as
schools, neighbourhoods and workplaces, also influence violence.
Risk factors here may include the level of unemployment, population
density, mobility and the existence of a local drug or gun
trade.
- Societal factors influence whether violence is encouraged or
inhibited. These include economic and social policies that maintain
socioeconomic inequalities between people, the availability of
weapons, and social and cultural norms such as those around male
dominance over women, parental dominance over children and cultural
norms that endorse violence as an acceptable method to resolve
conflicts.
- The Social Ecological Model (SEM) is a theory-based framework for understanding the multifaceted and interactive effects of personal and environmental factors that determine behaviors, and for identifying behavioral and organizational leverage points and intermediaries for health promotion within organizations.
Example:
- A vast amount of literature exists pertaining to female coaches at all levels of competition from around the globe.
- Using Brofenbrenner's ecological systems theory, the complex and multidimensional barriers that affect, impede or prevent females from seeking or remaining in coaching positions, in addition to factors that support and facilitate career advancement and retention.
- Barriers and supports are organized from most proximal (individual) to most distal (socio-cultural) to the coach.
- The model can be used as a reflective heuristic to educate about the numerous dynamic organizational and societal barriers and supports engaged with by female coaches.
- In doing so, productive coping strategies can be learned and solutions and policy changes generated in order to increase opportunities for female coaches and make the environment within which they work increasingly inclusive, positive and supportive.
What are the Barriers and supporter for the Ecological Framework Model
A major premise of the ecological model is A. benefits have to outweigh barriers in order for health behavior to occur B. examining factors that influence behavior eliminates victim blaming C. dramatic relief is a useful intervention to move people to change health behaviors D. the most effective way to change behavior is to provide patient education
A major premise of the ecological model is A. benefits have to outweigh barriers in order for health behavior to occur B. examining factors that influence behavior eliminates victim blaming C. dramatic relief is a useful intervention to move people to change health behaviors D. the most effective way to change behavior is to provide patient education
Compare and Contrast the biological framework and the socio-ecological framework for public health. Select a single disease/risk factor that would best be approached from and biological framework, and another that would best be approached from a socio-ecological framework. Justify your answer.
Compare and Contrast the biological framework and the socio-ecological framework for public health. Select a single disease/risk factor that would best be approached from and biological framework, and another that would best be approached from a socio-ecological framework. Justify your answer.
Public Health question, ASAP please Compare and Contrast the biological framework and the socio-ecological framework for public health. Select a single disease/risk factor that would best be approached from and biological framework, and another that would best be approached from a socio-ecological framework. Justify your answer. Select one disease and a single risk factor. Describe one current way in which public health is addressing that risk factor. explain the theoretical framework that is used to justify th public health intervention...
"Where do community level theories “fit” into the Ecological Framework OR the Theory of Triadic influence presented at the beginning of this course? Could we use concepts/constructs from BOTH diffusion of innovation AND Social Capital Theory in an intervention to increase the use of a new community walking trail? What constructs or ideas from each could be targeted and how?"
Where do individual level theories “fit” into the Ecological Framework or the Theory of Triadic influence presented at the beginning of this course? From a Public Health perspective, can we use individual level theories exclusively to explain and change health behaviors? Why or why not? Explain your answer use supportive proof and examples
What are barriers in using Betty Neuman's systems model theory
Hello, please assist with the following: Topic: Using the ecological model of health behavior, visit the american legacy's foundation, the truth or the truth initiative, then use the ecological model of health behavior to design a community program to discourage smoking among teenagers.
What is the difference between a model, theory, framework, and philosophy? How are they related? (Discriminate between the concepts).