Question

Based on the various numbers and ratios in the spreadsheet, and based on what you know about the companies, what conclusions can you draw about the three companies and how they compare? How do their business models and strategies differ?

COGS Gross Profit 48,872 361.256 15,818 12,068 3,672 20,623 SG&A D&A Operating Income (EBIT) 13,356 2,298 4,969 101,853 22,764 Net Interest expense Income tax expense Net Income 53 1,243 2,350 1,004 1.296 2,669 2,267 6.204 13,643 D&A 1,255 2,298 10,080 EBITDA $3,672.00 $7,267.00 $22,764.00 Gross Margin (%) EBITDA Margin (%) Net Income Margin (%) 13.32% 3.09% 1.98% 29.68% 7.15% 3.84% 25.65% 4.69% 2.81% SGA as % of Rev 10.17% 19.22% 20.96% Number of Stores Total Square Feet (mm) Square feet/store 715 103 144,336 1,802 240 132,908 11,695 1,164 99,564 Revenue/Store ($mm) Revenue/Square fooft $166.04 $0.82 $38.57 $0.52 $41.55 $4.88 EBITDA/Store ($mm) $5.14 $4.03 $1.95

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Generally, the companies are evaluated based on the Return on Equity or Return on Assets. As the gross margin may not be correct indicator of the business. As per the Dupont analysis,

Revenue , AveAssit nonequity = (Nett ncome) x ( Retur AveAsst Ave Equity Revenue

= (Profitability)* (Asset Turnover) * (Financial Leverage)

Now for the given example if we assume store cost are same, and they are the only assets required, we have

Net Income Margin Asset Turnover Leverage
Company 1 1.98% 0.82x N.A.
Company 2 3.84% 0.52x N.A.
Company 3 2.81% 4.88x N.A.

Here x is the variable which will be related to cost of the store.

Based on two factors, company 3 fare good as compared to other two companies, and Company 1 and Company 2 are comparable.

Now, since the balancesheet is not given, commenting on leverage is difficult.

However, by examining the interest expenses by the companies, we understand Company 2 pays highest interest for per square feet of the store. This may be because interest expense of company two is higher, or company 2 have higher debt.

For this case, if we assume, interest rates for all companies are same, then leverage component of Company 2 is higher. A comparison of interest is as per the following table;

Company 1 Company 2 Company 3
Interest 53 1004 2267
sq Feet Mn 103 240 1164
Estimated leverage 0.51y 4.18y 1.95y

Here, y is a variable dependent on asset price and other things.

Hence, if interest rate are same, company 2 have twice the leverage as compared to company 1.

However, first two component of Company 3 are 6.85 time of company 2. Hence, Return on equity of the Company 3 is better. Further, the first two component represents the return on assets. Hence in terms of return of assets, company 3 may be doing good.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Based on the various numbers and ratios in the spreadsheet, and based on what you know...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • What was the EV/EBITDA multiple Amazon actual paid to acquire Whole Foods using EBITDA at 9/25/2016?  Use...

    What was the EV/EBITDA multiple Amazon actual paid to acquire Whole Foods using EBITDA at 9/25/2016?  Use the data from Exhibit 1 for a top down EBITDA calculation (Starting from EBIT not Net Income), Depreciation & Amortization in fiscal 2016 of $498 million, and Amazon purchase price of $13.7 bln as the EV which includes Whole Foods debt (p.10 of the case). A. 3.2x B. 6.9x C. 10.0x D. 20.0x Please answer as soon as you reasonably can (in $ millions...

  • EV/EBITDA multiples can be used to benchmark or determine the potential acquisition price (where Enterprise Value=...

    EV/EBITDA multiples can be used to benchmark or determine the potential acquisition price (where Enterprise Value= Net Debt + Market Equity Value). What is the implied enterprise value for Whole Foods using the industry average EV/EBITDA  for fiscal year 2016? Use the data from Exhibit for a top down EBITDA calculation (Starting from EBIT not Net Income). Assumptions: Depreciation & Amortization in fiscal 2016 of $498 million, net debt at fiscal 2016 year end of $300 million, EV/EBITDA grocery industry average...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT