The two alternatives can be analysed on the basis of equivalent worth method and here we are taking Present worth method to analysing these two alternatives given that MARR is 15%. Assumptions we need to do here is that the alternatives are mutually exclusive and it means we can take any one alternative from these. Now we will calculate the PW of these two alternatives.
6-52. Compare alternatives A and B with the equivalent worth method of your choice if the...
Solve for A and B, Engineering Economy please solve it right! Question Help %) Problem 6-52 (algorithmic) Compare alternatives A and B with the present worth method if the MARR is 15% per year. Which one would you recommend? Assume repeatability and a study period of 20 years. $40,000 $7,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $700 per year thereafter $7,000 every 5 years $15,000 $14,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $1,400 per year thereafter...
Compare alternatives A and B with the present worth method if the MARR is 11% per year. Which one would you recommend? Assume repeatability and a study period of 12 years. $25,000 $10,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $1,000 per year thereafter None Capital Investment Operating Costs $55,000 $5,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $500 per year thereafter $5,000 every 3 years 12 years $10,000 if just overhauled Overhaul Costs Life 6 years negligible...
Compare alternatives A and B with the present worth method if the MARR is 10% per year. Which one would you recommend? Assume repeatability and a study period of 20 years $15,000 $45,000 Capital Investment Operating Costs $4,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $400 per year thereafter $4,000 every 5 years 20 years $8,000 at end of year 1 and increasing by $800 per year thereafter None Overhaul Costs Life 10 years Salvage Value $8,000 if just...
3. Compare the two following two alternatives using an equivalent worth method and a MARR of 12%. The repeatability assumption is acceptable. Aternative I: Initial investment of $45,000, net revenue the first year of $8,000, increasing $4,000 per year for the six year useful life. Salvage value is estimated to be $6500. Alternative II: Initial investment of $60,000, uniform annual revenue of $12,000 for the five year useful life. Slavage value is estimated to be $9,000.
Compare two alternatives, A and B. on the basis of a present worth evaluation using /= 10% per year and a study period of 8 years. Alternative A B First Cost $-19,000 $-46,000 Annual Operating Cost $-6,000 $-10,000 Overhaul in Year 4 $0 $-3,850 Salvage Value $1,200 $6,200 Life 8 years 4 years The present worth of alternative A is $ and that of alternative B is $ Alternative (Click to select) is selected.
Problem (2): Consider the following three mutually exclusive alternatives. MARR is 10%. Alternative 1 10,000 Alternative 2 14,500 Alternative 3 20,000 $3,000 increasing by 500 each year thereafter negligible $5,000 Initial investment Annual yielded returns Salvage Value Service life $5,000 $5,000 negligible 6 a) Compute the payback (PB) period and discounted PB period of each alternative. Based on the PB period, which alternative do you recommend? b) Using Annual-worth analysis, which alternative do you recommend?
Your firm is thinking about investing $200,000 in the overhaul of a manufacturing cell in a lean environment. Revenues are expected to be $36,000 in year one and then increasing by $12,000 more each year thereafter. Relevant expenses will be $10,000 in year one and will increase by $5,000 per year until the end of the cell's five-year life. Salvage recovery at the end of year five is estimated to be $9,000. What is the annual equivalent worth of the...
Techmac Manufacturing is considering the following two alternatives. The cost information for the two proposals for replacing an equipment are provided are in table below. Initial cost $120,000 Benefits/year $20,000 for the first 10 years S12,000 per year for 20 years. Machine Y S96,000 Machine X and $9,000 for the next 10 years 20 years Life Salvage value $40,000 MARR S20,000 10% a) Determine the engineering economic symbols for each b) Draw the Cash flow Diagram for each Alternative c)...
A company is considering two investment alternatives. Alternative A is a new machine that costs $50,000 and will last for ten years with no salvage value. It will save the company $5479 per year and the savings will increase by $2050 each year. Alternative B is a is a machine that will cost $75,000 and last 10 years. The salvage value at the end of 10 years is $25,000. It will save $11352 per year. Find the present worth of...
QUESTION 6 Data for two mutually exclusive alternatives are given below. Alternatives B $4,000 $800 А Initial Cost $5,000 Annual Benefits (beginning at end of $1,500 year 1) Annual Costs (beginning at end of year $500 1) Salvage Value $500 Useful Life (years) 5 $200 $0 10 Compute the net present worth for each alternative and choose the better alternative. MARR = 8%