Suppose a firm has had the following historic sales figures. Year: 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sales $3,900,000 $5,150,000 $3,800,000 $3,400,000 $4,000,000 What would be the forecast for next year’s sales using the naïve approach?
As per the naive approach, last period's actuals are used as this period's forecasts. Hence forecasted sales for 2017 would be actual sales for 2016 i.e. $4,000,000.
Happy Learning!
Suppose a firm has had the following historic sales figures. Year: 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016...
Suppose a firm has had the following historic sales figures. Year: 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sales $3,100,000 $3,350,000 $3,000,000 $3,600,000 $3,200,000 What would be the forecast for next year’s sales using the average approach?
Suppose a firm has had the following historic sales figures. Year: 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sales: $3,200,000 $$3,450,000 $3,100,000 $3,700,000 3,300,000 What would be the forecast for next year's sales using the average approach?
Naïve Sales Forecast Suppose a firm has had the following historic sales figures What would be the forecast for next year's sales using the Naïve approach? 15-1 (LG15-3) Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sales $1,500,000 $1,750,000$1,400,000 $2,000,000 $1,600000
Problem 15-2 Naive Sales Forecast (LG15-3) Suppose a firm has had the following historic sales figures. Year: Sales 2012 $3,700,000 2013 $4,950,000 2014 $3,600,000 2015 $3,200,000 2016 $3,500,000 What would be the forecast for next year's sales using the naive approach? Next year's sales Sybe here to search W F R T Y U I O P s o F C H ] K L Problem 15-2 Naive Sales Forecast (LG15-3) Suppose a firm has had the following historic sales...
Suppose a firm has had the following historic sales figures. Year: 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Sales $1,440,000 $1,670,000 $1,590,000 $2,000,000 $1,810,000 What would be the forecast for next year’s sales using regression to estimate a trend? Next year’s sales?
1. The JOBS Act of 2012 enabled what type of offerings? A. OPOs consisting of equity crowdfunding offerings conducted over the Internet B. IPOs conducted on regional exchanges C. Rewards-based crowdfunding offerings conducted over the Internet D. Equity crowdfunding offerings conducted on the NYSE 2. A firm has the following sale figures: l Year 2011: $4.6 million; l Year 2012: $5.1 million l Year 2013: $4.2 million l Year 2014: $3.8 million l Year 2015: $4.3 million Using the average...
1. The JOBS Act of 2012 enabled what type of offerings? A. OPOs consisting of equity crowdfunding offerings conducted over the Internet B. IPOs conducted on regional exchanges C. Rewards-based crowdfunding offerings conducted over the Internet D. Equity crowdfunding offerings conducted on the NYSE 2. A firm has the following sale figures: l Year 2011: $4.6 million; l Year 2012: $5.1 million l Year 2013: $4.2 million l Year 2014: $3.8 million l Year 2015: $4.3 million Using the average...
Assume the following sales data for a company: 2015 $1,200,000 2014 960,000 2013 840,000 2012 600,000 Knowledge Check 02 If 2012 is the base year, what is the percentage increase in sales from 2012 to 2014?
24) 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 Sales $ 589,885 $ 388,082 $ 306,784 $ 214,534 $ 160,100 Cost of goods sold 309,290 203,453 162,828 113,108 83,252 Accounts receivable 28,668 22,664 21,015 12,507 10,967 Compute trend percents for the above accounts, using 2013 as the base year. Trend Percent for Net Sales: Choose Numerator: / Choose Denominator 2017 2016 2015 2014 Trend Percent for Cost of Goods Sold: Choose Numerator: / Choose Denominator 2017 2016 2015 2014 Trend Percent for Accounts...
6 2017 2013 2015 $711,344 $461,912 $365,148 $248,400 $180,0ee 2016 2014 Sales Cost of goods sold 358,272 232,606 185,974 125,250 90,0 Accounts receivable 34,358 26,929 24,976 14,507 12, 312 10 Compute trend percents for the above accounts, using 2013 as the base year t Sales: , Choose Denominator: Sales 2017 Hint 2016 2015 2014 Choose Choose Denominator Cost of goods sold 2017 2016 2015 2014 2017 2016 2015 2014