Part 1
PITTSBURGH ALUMINUM COMPANY Cost of Production Report—Rolling Department For the Month Ended September 30 |
|||
UNITS |
Equivalent Units |
||
Whole Unit |
Direct Materials |
Conversion |
|
Units charged to production: |
|||
Inventory in process, September 1 |
1200 |
||
Received from Smelting Department |
27240 |
||
Total units accounted for by the Rolling Department |
28440 |
||
Units to be assigned cost: |
|||
Inventory in process, September 1 (60% completed) |
1200 |
0 |
480 |
Started and completed in September |
25140 |
25140 |
25140 |
Transferred to finished goods in September |
26340 |
25140 |
25620 |
Inventory in process, September 30 (20% complete) |
2100 |
2100 |
420 |
Total units to be assigned cost |
28440 |
27240 |
26040 |
COSTS |
Costs |
||
Direct Materials |
Conversion |
Total |
|
Costs per equivalent unit: |
|||
Total costs for September in Rolling Department |
138924 |
57288 |
|
Total equivalent units |
27240 |
26040 |
|
Cost per equivalent unit |
5.10 |
2.20 |
|
Costs assigned to production: |
|||
Inventory in process, September 1 |
7512 |
||
Costs incurred in September |
196212 |
||
Total costs accounted for by the Rolling Department |
203724 |
||
Cost allocated to completed and partially completed units: |
|||
Inventory in process, September 1 balance |
7512 |
||
To complete inventory in process, September 1 |
0 |
1056 |
1056 |
Cost of completed September 1 work in process |
8568 |
||
Started and completed in September |
128214 |
55308 |
183522 |
Transferred to finished goods in September |
192090 |
||
Inventory in process, September 30 |
9690 |
924 |
11634 |
Total costs assigned by the Rolling Department |
203724 |
37237+20051 =57288
480*2.20= 1056
25140*5.10 = 128214
25140*2.2 = 55308
2100*4.70 = 9690
420*2.20= 924
Part 2
Date |
Item |
Debit |
Credit |
Debit |
Credit |
October 1 |
Balance |
11634 |
|||
October 31 |
Smelting Dept 31300 units at $5.3 |
165890 |
177524 |
||
October 31 |
Direct labor |
48830 |
226354 |
||
October 31 |
Factory overhead |
26288 |
252642 |
||
October 31 |
Finished goods |
||||
October 31 |
Bal., 1600 units, 80% completed |
PITTSBURGH ALUMINUM COMPANY Cost of Production Report—Rolling Department For the Month Ended October 31 |
|||
UNITS |
Equivalent Units |
||
Whole Unit |
Direct Materials |
Conversion |
|
Units charged to production: |
|||
Inventory in process, October 1 |
2100 |
||
Received from Smelting Department |
31300 |
||
Total units accounted for by the Rolling Department |
33400 |
||
Units to be assigned cost: |
|||
Inventory in process, October 1 (20% completed) |
2100 |
0 |
1680 |
Started and completed in September |
29700 |
29700 |
29700 |
Transferred to finished goods in September |
31800 |
29700 |
31380 |
Inventory in process, October 30 (80% complete) |
1600 |
1600 |
1280 |
Total units to be assigned cost |
33400 |
31300 |
32660 |
COSTS |
Costs |
||
Direct Materials |
Conversion |
Total |
|
Costs per equivalent unit: |
|||
Total costs for October in Rolling Department |
165890 |
75118 |
|
Total equivalent units |
31300 |
32660 |
|
Cost per equivalent unit |
5.30 |
2.30 |
|
Costs assigned to production: |
|||
Inventory in process, October 1 |
11634 |
||
Costs incurred in October |
241008 |
||
Total costs accounted for by the Rolling Department |
252642 |
||
Cost allocated to completed and partially completed units: |
|||
Inventory in process, October 1 balance |
11634 |
||
To complete inventory in process, October 1 |
0 |
3864 |
3864 |
Cost of completed October 1 work in process |
15498 |
||
Started and completed in September |
157410 |
68310 |
225720 |
Transferred to finished goods in September |
241218 |
||
Inventory in process, September 30 |
8480 |
2944 |
11424 |
Total costs assigned by the Rolling Department |
252642 |
48830+26288 = 75118
1680*2.30 = 3864
29700*5.30 = 157410
29700*2.30 = 68310
1600*5.30 = 8480
1280*2.30 = 2944
Part 3
The cost per equivalent unit for direct materials increased from August to October. The cost per equivalent unit for conversion costs increased August to October. These charges should be investigated for their underlying causes, and any necessary corrective actions should be taken.
Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses...
Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses a process cost system to record the costs of manufacturing rolled aluminum, which consists of the smelting and rolling processes. Materials are entered from smelting at the beginning of the rolling process. The inventory of Work in Process—Rolling on September 1 and debits to the account during September were as follows: Bal., 1,000 units, 20% completed: Direct materials (1,000 x $5.5) $ 5,500 Conversion...
Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses a process cost system to record the costs of manufacturing rolled aluminum, which consists of the smelting and rolling processes. Materials are entered from smelting at the beginning of the rolling process. The inventory of Work in Process—Rolling on September 1 and debits to the account during September were as follows: Bal., 800 units, 80% completed: Direct materials (800 x $4.6) $ 3,680 Conversion...
Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses a process cost system to record the costs of manufacturing rolled aluminum, which consists of the smelting and rolling processes. Materials are entered from smelting at the beginning of the rolling process. The inventory of Work in Process—Rolling on September 1 and debits to the account during September were as follows: Bal., 800 units, 80% completed: Direct materials (800 x $4.6) $ 3,680 Conversion...
Homework eBook Calculator Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses a process cost system to record the costs of manufacturing rolled aluminum, which consists of the smelting and rolling processes. Materials are entered from smelting at the beginning of the rolling process. The Inventory of Work In Process-Rolling on September 1 and debits to the account during September were as follows: Bal., 1,200 units, 60% completed: Direct materials (1,200 x $7)...
Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses a process cost system to record the costs of manufacturing rolled aluminum, which consists of the smelting and rolling processes. Materials are entered from smelting at the beginning of the rolling process. The inventory of Work in Process—Rolling on September 1 and debits to the account during September were as follows: Bal., 800 units, 30% completed: Direct materials (800 x $ 3.8) $ 3,040 Conversion (800 x 30% x $1.6) 384 $ 3,424 From Smelting Department,...
Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses a process cost system to record the costs of manufacturing rolled aluminum, which consists of the smelting and rolling processes. Materials are entered from smelting at the beginning of the rolling process. The inventory of Work in Process—Rolling on September 1 and debits to the account during September were as follows: Bal., 800 units, 80% completed: Direct materials (800 x $4.6) $ 3,680 Conversion (800 x 80% x $1.9) 1,216 $ 4,896 From Smelting Department, 18,480...
Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports Hearty Soup Co. uses a process cost system to record the costs of processing soup, which requires the cooking and filling processes. Materials are entered from the cooking process at the beginning of the filling process. The inventory of Work in Process-Filling on April 1 and debits to the account during April were as follows: Bal., 800 units, 60% completed: Direct materials (800 x $5.80) $ 4,640 Conversion...
Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports Hearty Soup Co. uses a process cost system to record the costs of processing soup, which requires the cooking and filling processes. Materials are entered from the cooking process at the beginning of the filling process. The inventory of Work in Process-Filling on April 1 and debits to the account during April were as follows: Bal., 600 units, 70% completed: $ 2,580 Direct materials (600 x $4.30) Conversion...
eBook Calculator Print Item Work in process account data for two months; cost of production reports Hearty Soup Co. uses a process cost system to record the costs of processing soup, which requires the cooking and filling processes. Materials are entered from the cooking process at the beginning of the filling process. The inventory of Work in Process -Filling on April 1 and debits to the account during April were as follows: Bal., 800 units, 30% completed: Direct materials (800...
Cost of Units Transferred Out and Ending Work in Process The costs per equivalent unit of direct materials and conversion in the Rolling Department of Kraus Steel Company are $1.45 and $0.95, respectively. The equivalent units to be assigned costs are as follows: Equivalent Units Direct Materials Conversion 0 Inventory in process, October 1 Started and completed during October Transferred out of Rolling (completed) Inventory in process, October 31 5,600 70,000 70,000 70,000 6,000 75,600 2,400 78,000 Total units to...