Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports
Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses a process cost system to record the costs of manufacturing rolled aluminum, which consists of the smelting and rolling processes. Materials are entered from smelting at the beginning of the rolling process. The inventory of Work in Process—Rolling on September 1 and debits to the account during September were as follows:
Bal., 800 units, 80% completed: | ||
Direct materials (800 x $4.6) | $ 3,680 | |
Conversion (800 x 80% x $1.9) | 1,216 | |
$ 4,896 | ||
From Smelting Department, 18,480 units | $86,856 | |
Direct labor | 22,503 | |
Factory overhead | 12,117 |
During September, 800 units in process on September 1 were completed, and of the 18,480 units entering the department, all were completed except 1,900 units that were 30% completed. Charges to Work in Process—Rolling for October were as follows:
From Smelting Department, 21,300 units | $104,370 |
Direct labor | 30,070 |
Factory overhead | 16,193 |
During October, the units in process at the beginning of the month were completed, and of the 21,300 units entering the department, all were completed except 1,000 units that were 40% completed.
Required:
1. Enter the balance as of September 1 in a four-column account for Work in Process—Rolling. Record the debits and the credits in the account for September. Construct a cost of production report and present computations for determining (a) equivalent units of production for materials and conversion, (b) costs per equivalent unit, (c) cost of goods finished, differentiating between units started in the prior period and units started and finished in September, and (d) work in process inventory. If an amount box does not require an entry, leave it blank.
2. Provide the same information for October by recording the October transactions in the four-column work in process account. Construct a cost of production report, and present the October computations (a through d) listed in part (1). If an amount box does not require an entry, leave it blank.
ACCOUNT | Work in Process-Rolling Department | ACCOUNT NO. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance | ||||||
DATE | ITEM | POST. REF. | DEBIT | CREDIT | DEBIT | CREDIT |
October 1 | Balance | |||||
October 31 | Smelting Dept., 21,300 units at $4.9 | |||||
October 31 | Direct labor | |||||
October 31 | Factory overhead | |||||
October 31 | Finished goods | |||||
October 31 | Bal., 1,000 units, 40% completed |
If an amount is zero, enter in a zero "0". Round cost per unit answers to the nearest cent.
Pittsburgh Aluminum Company Cost of Production Report-Rolling Department For the Month Ended October 31 |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Whole Units | Equivalent Units | ||
Units | Direct Materials (a) | Conversion (a) | |
Units charged to production: | |||
Inventory in process, October 1 | |||
Received from Smelting Department | |||
Total units accounted for by the Rolling Department | |||
Units to be assigned costs: | |||
Inventory in process, October 1 | |||
Started and completed in October | |||
Transferred to finished goods in October | |||
Inventory in process, October 31 | |||
Total units to be assigned costs |
Costs | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Costs | Direct Materials | Conversion | Total Costs | |||||||||
Cost per equivalent unit: | ||||||||||||
Total costs for October in Rolling Department | $ | $ | ||||||||||
Total equivalent units | ||||||||||||
Cost per equivalent unit (b) | $ | $ | ||||||||||
Costs assigned to production: | ||||||||||||
Inventory in process, October 1 | $ | |||||||||||
Costs incurred in October | ||||||||||||
Total costs accounted for by the Rolling Department | $ | |||||||||||
Costs allocated to completed and partially completed units: | ||||||||||||
Inventory in process, October 1 balance (c) | $ | |||||||||||
To complete inventory in process, October 1 (c) | $ | $ | ||||||||||
Cost of completed October 1 work in process | $ | |||||||||||
Started and completed in October (c) | ||||||||||||
Transferred to finished goods in October (c) | $ | |||||||||||
Inventory in process, October 31 (d) | ||||||||||||
Total costs assigned by the Rolling Department | $ |
3. The cost per equivalent unit for direct materials increased from August to October. The cost per equivalent unit for conversion costs increased from August to October. These changes should be investigated for their underlying causes, and any necessary corrective actions should be taken.
Part 1
PITTSBURGH ALUMINUM COMPANY Cost of Production Report—Rolling Department For the Month Ended September 30 |
|||
UNITS |
Equivalent Units |
||
Whole Unit |
Direct Materials |
Conversion |
|
Units charged to production: |
|||
Inventory in process, September 1 |
800 |
||
Received from Smelting Department |
18480 |
||
Total units accounted for by the Rolling Department |
19280 |
||
Units to be assigned cost: |
|||
Inventory in process, September 1 (80% completed) |
800 |
0 |
160 |
Started and completed in September |
16580 |
16580 |
16580 |
Transferred to finished goods in September |
17380 |
16580 |
16740 |
Inventory in process, September 30 (30% complete) |
1900 |
1900 |
570 |
Total units to be assigned cost |
19280 |
18480 |
17310 |
COSTS |
Costs |
||
Direct Materials |
Conversion |
Total |
|
Costs per equivalent unit: |
|||
Total costs for September in Rolling Department |
86856 |
34620 |
|
Total equivalent units |
18480 |
17310 |
|
Cost per equivalent unit |
4.70 |
2.00 |
|
Costs assigned to production: |
|||
Inventory in process, September 1 |
4896 |
||
Costs incurred in September |
121476 |
||
Total costs accounted for by the Rolling Department |
126372 |
||
Cost allocated to completed and partially completed units: |
|||
Inventory in process, September 1 balance |
4896 |
||
To complete inventory in process, September 1 |
0 |
320 |
320 |
Cost of completed September 1 work in process |
5216 |
||
Started and completed in September |
77926 |
33160 |
111086 |
Transferred to finished goods in September |
116302 |
||
Inventory in process, September 30 |
8930 |
1140 |
10070 |
Total costs assigned by the Rolling Department |
126372 |
22503+12117 =34620
160*2= 320
16580*4.70 = 77926
16580*2 = 33160
1900*4.70 = 8930
570*2.00= 2888
PITTSBURGH ALUMINUM COMPANY Cost of Production Report—Rolling Department For the Month Ended October 31 |
|||
UNITS |
Equivalent Units |
||
Whole Unit |
Direct Materials |
Conversion |
|
Units charged to production: |
|||
Inventory in process, October 1 |
1900 |
||
Received from Smelting Department |
21300 |
||
Total units accounted for by the Rolling Department |
23200 |
||
Units to be assigned cost: |
|||
Inventory in process, October 1 (30% completed) |
1900 |
0 |
1330 |
Started and completed in September |
20300 |
20300 |
20300 |
Transferred to finished goods in September |
22200 |
20300 |
21630 |
Inventory in process, October 30 (40% complete) |
1000 |
1000 |
400 |
Total units to be assigned cost |
23200 |
21300 |
22030 |
COSTS |
Costs |
||
Direct Materials |
Conversion |
Total |
|
Costs per equivalent unit: |
|||
Total costs for October in Rolling Department |
104370 |
46263 |
|
Total equivalent units |
21300 |
22030 |
|
Cost per equivalent unit |
4.90 |
2.10 |
|
Costs assigned to production: |
|||
Inventory in process, October 1 |
10070 |
||
Costs incurred in October |
150633 |
||
Total costs accounted for by the Rolling Department |
160703 |
||
Cost allocated to completed and partially completed units: |
|||
Inventory in process, October 1 balance |
10070 |
||
To complete inventory in process, October 1 |
0 |
320 |
2793 |
Cost of completed October 1 work in process |
12863 |
||
Started and completed in September |
99470 |
42630 |
142100 |
Transferred to finished goods in September |
154963 |
||
Inventory in process, September 30 |
4900 |
840 |
5740 |
Total costs assigned by the Rolling Department |
160703 |
30070+16193 = 46263
1330*2.10 = 2793
20300*4.90 = 99470
20300*2.10 = 42630
1000*4.90 = 4900
400*2.10 = 840
Part 3
The cost per equivalent unit for direct materials increased from $4.60 in August to $4.70 in September to $4.90 in October. The cost per equivalent unit for conversion costs increased from 1.90 in August to $2.00 in September to $2.10 in October. These increases should be investigated for their underlying causes, and any necessary corrective actions should be taken.
Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses...
Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses a process cost system to record the costs of manufacturing rolled aluminum, which consists of the smelting and rolling processes. Materials are entered from smelting at the beginning of the rolling process. The inventory of Work in Process—Rolling on September 1 and debits to the account during September were as follows: Bal., 800 units, 80% completed: Direct materials (800 x $4.6) $ 3,680 Conversion...
Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses a process cost system to record the costs of manufacturing rolled aluminum, which consists of the smelting and rolling processes. Materials are entered from smelting at the beginning of the rolling process. The inventory of Work in Process—Rolling on September 1 and debits to the account during September were as follows: Bal., 1,200 units, 60% completed: Direct materials (1,200 x $5) Conversion (1,200 x...
Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses a process cost system to record the costs of manufacturing rolled aluminum, which consists of the smelting and rolling processes. Materials are entered from smelting at the beginning of the rolling process. The inventory of Work in Process—Rolling on September 1 and debits to the account during September were as follows: Bal., 1,000 units, 20% completed: Direct materials (1,000 x $5.5) $ 5,500 Conversion...
Homework eBook Calculator Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses a process cost system to record the costs of manufacturing rolled aluminum, which consists of the smelting and rolling processes. Materials are entered from smelting at the beginning of the rolling process. The Inventory of Work In Process-Rolling on September 1 and debits to the account during September were as follows: Bal., 1,200 units, 60% completed: Direct materials (1,200 x $7)...
Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses a process cost system to record the costs of manufacturing rolled aluminum, which consists of the smelting and rolling processes. Materials are entered from smelting at the beginning of the rolling process. The inventory of Work in Process—Rolling on September 1 and debits to the account during September were as follows: Bal., 800 units, 80% completed: Direct materials (800 x $4.6) $ 3,680 Conversion (800 x 80% x $1.9) 1,216 $ 4,896 From Smelting Department, 18,480...
Pittsburgh Aluminum Company uses a process cost system to record the costs of manufacturing rolled aluminum, which consists of the smelting and rolling processes. Materials are entered from smelting at the beginning of the rolling process. The inventory of Work in Process—Rolling on September 1 and debits to the account during September were as follows: Bal., 800 units, 30% completed: Direct materials (800 x $ 3.8) $ 3,040 Conversion (800 x 30% x $1.6) 384 $ 3,424 From Smelting Department,...
Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports Hearty Soup Co. uses a process cost system to record the costs of processing soup, which requires the cooking and filling processes. Materials are entered from the cooking process at the beginning of the filling process. The inventory of Work in Process-Filling on April 1 and debits to the account during April were as follows: Bal., 800 units, 60% completed: Direct materials (800 x $5.80) $ 4,640 Conversion...
Work in Process Account Data for Two Months; Cost of Production Reports Hearty Soup Co. uses a process cost system to record the costs of processing soup, which requires the cooking and filling processes. Materials are entered from the cooking process at the beginning of the filling process. The inventory of Work in Process-Filling on April 1 and debits to the account during April were as follows: Bal., 600 units, 70% completed: $ 2,580 Direct materials (600 x $4.30) Conversion...
eBook Calculator Print Item Work in process account data for two months; cost of production reports Hearty Soup Co. uses a process cost system to record the costs of processing soup, which requires the cooking and filling processes. Materials are entered from the cooking process at the beginning of the filling process. The inventory of Work in Process -Filling on April 1 and debits to the account during April were as follows: Bal., 800 units, 30% completed: Direct materials (800...
Cost of Units Transferred Out and Ending Work in Process The costs per equivalent unit of direct materials and conversion in the Rolling Department of Kraus Steel Company are $1.45 and $0.95, respectively. The equivalent units to be assigned costs are as follows: Equivalent Units Direct Materials Conversion 0 Inventory in process, October 1 Started and completed during October Transferred out of Rolling (completed) Inventory in process, October 31 5,600 70,000 70,000 70,000 6,000 75,600 2,400 78,000 Total units to...