4. Consider the game below. P2's strategy C is a dominated strategy. True or False? Show...
1. P1 and P2 play the game shown below. P1 believes that P2 will play Left with probability and Right with probability 2. Find the expected payoff for P1 if P1 plays Top and Bottom with equal probability. (2 points) Player 2 Left Right Player 1 Тор 4, 1 0,0 Bottom 2, 5 1,0 2. Find all the strategy profiles that are Pareto efficient for the game shown below.(2 points) Player 2 Left Middle Right 1,0 Player 1 Up 4,...
2. Iterative Deletion of (weakly) Dominated Strategies Consider the following two-player game 2 I c I T 1,1 0,1 3,1 1 M 1,0 2,2 1,3 D 1,3 3,1 2,2 (a) Are there any strictly dominated strategies? Are there any weakly dominated strategies? If so, explain what dominates what and how. (b) After deleting any strictly or weakly dominated strategies, are there any strictly or weakly dominated strategies in the reduced' game? If so, explain what dominates what and how. What...
Exercise 4 - Pure strategies that are only strictly dominated by a mixed strategy Consider the following normal form game Player 2 Left Right Player 1 4,1 Down 13 12 b) Is there some strictly dominated strategy for player 1 when mixed strategies are allowed? [Hint: 0,2 4,1 Middle0,0 a) c) d) Is there some strictly dominated strategy for player 1 involving only the use of pure strategies? you may assign probabilities to two of her strategies, similarly as we...
Problem 2: Consider the following normal form game: | A | B | C D L 2 ,3 -1,3 0,0 4,3 M -1,0 3,0 / 0,10 2,0 R 1,1 | 2,1 3,1 3,1 Part a: What are the pure strategies that are strictly dominated in the above game? Part 6: What are the rationalizable strategies for each player? What are all the rationalizable strategy profiles? Part c: Find all of the Nash equilibria of the game above.
Problem #3: Strictly dominated and non-rationalizable strategies (6 pts) Below, there are three game tables. For each one, identify which strategies are non-rationalizable (if any), and which strategies are strictly dominated (if any). Do this for both players in each game. Note: You don't need to use IESDS or IENBR in this problem: I only want to know which strategies are strictly dominated or non-rationalizable in the games as presented. Rogers Go Rogue Go Legit 2,3 3,4 3,2 5,1 3,1...
7. Consider the following two player game, with the players being 1 and 2. As usual 1 chooses a row and 2 a column. ABC a 1,4 2,1 3,2 4,1 b 2,3 3,4 4,3 1,2 с 3,1 4,2 1,4 2,3 d 4,2 1,3 4,3 3,2 (a) Which strategies satisfy iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies? How many levels of knowledge of rationality do you have to assume to obtain your result? (b) If you were allowed to follow the same...
S5. Consider the following game table: COLIN North South East West Earth 1,3 3,1 0,2 1,1 Water 1,2 1,2 2,3 1,1 ROWENA Wind 3,2 2,1 1,3 0,3 Fire 2,0 3,0 1,1 2,2 124 [CH. 4] SIMULTANEOUS-MOVE GAMES: DISCRETE STRATEGIES (a) Does either Rowena or Colin have a dominant strategy? Explain why or why not. (b) Use iterated elimination of dominated strategies to reduce the game as much as possible. Give the order in which the eliminations occur and give the...
1 Consider the following normal-form game. P2 L CR P M (a) Does Pl (player 1) have any dominated strategies? (b) Does P2 (player 2) have any dominated strategies? (c) Suppose l2 beleves that Pl is rational, should P2 believe P1 will ever play B? (d) Suppose player P2 rales out the possibility that Pl plays B, is there a dominated ECON 306 Page 2 of 12 2018 strategy for player P2? (e) Can yoa find any more eliminated strategies...
Consider the following extensive-form game with two players, 1 and 2. a). Find the pure-strategy Nash equilibria of the game. [8 Marks] b). Find the pure-strategy subgame-perfect equilibria of the game. [6 Marks] c). Derive the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium of the subgame. If players play this mixed Nash equilibrium in the subgame, would 1 player In or Out at the initial mode? [6 Marks] [Hint: Write down the normal-form of the subgame and derive the mixed Nash equilibrium of...
Please answer 3 Questions, thank you. 4. Consider the following game: PLAYER 2 (0,3) (2,0) (1,7) PLAYER 1 (2,4) (0,6) (2,0) (1,3) (2,4) (0,3) a) Does this game have any pure-strategy Nash equilibrium? If so, identify it (or them) and explain why this is an equilibrium. b) Find a mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium to this game and explain your calculations. Note: a mixed strategy for player i may be expressed by o; = (P1, P2, 1- P1 - p2). c) Is...