Are the subgames of a sequential game visible when the entire game is presented in strategic form? Explain.
Yes.
This is because in strategic form game, one can see what the other player will do and has strategies to play, in case the other player plays any specific strategy.
Though a strategically presented game will chose a simultaneous game structure, one can still make out the moves and payoffs of one player when the other player plays one strategy before him.
Are the subgames of a sequential game visible when the entire game is presented in strategic...
Are the subgames of a sequential game visible when the entire game is presented in strategic form? Explain.
Can backward induction be readily applied when a sequential game is presented as a payoff matrix? Discuss.
In the strategic view of bargaining, it entails that bargaining should be taken as a game of sequential moves which when combined together result in an outcome. The game must however, be very clearly and precisely advised that way the rules are very well respected. Strategic bargaining involves very calculated moves which are respected amongst both parties. A perfect example of this can be any organization done between unions and employers. In this situation, all the necessary factors are present...
So far, we have two ways to write a game: extensive form and strategic form. One of these is more suited to sequential games, and one is more suited to simultaneous games. Explain why, with reference to a simple game that could be played sequentially or simultaneously.
Consider the extensive form game above. The game has__________ subgames. The strategy profile (AGJKM, CE) leads to a payoff of_________ for Player 1 and____________ for Player 2. In the backward induction equilibrium in pure strategies Player 2 gets a payoff of______________ (Please, enter only numerical values like: 0, 1, 2, 3,....).
Consider the extensive form game above. The game has _______
proper subgames. The strategy profile (AGJKM, CF) leads to a payoff
of _______ for Player 1 and _________ for Player 2. In the backward
induction equilibrium in pure strategies. Player 2 gets a payoff of
____________ (Please, enter only numerical values like: 0, 1, 2,
3,....).
2 36 8 LM 2 2 2 4 2 5
Provide an example of a sequential game between 2 real companies in a specific oligopolistic industry. Identify the 2 companies and describe the industry, business strategy applied to the game, and possible payoffs from each strategic choice. What managerial insights can be derived by applying the concept of sequential game in your example?
led Notes Problem.4: Strategies and Subgames (4 pts) Consider the following game tree: The payoffs in this game tree have been left blank, because they will not matter in this question. Additionally, the decision nodes have been marked so that they can be referred to easily: 1A,1B. IC, and ID are all decision nodes belonging to Player 1, while 2A, 2B, and 2C all belong to Player 2. a) How many strategies does each player have? (Remember that a strategy...
Game Theory: Put the given game in strategic form, Find all pure
strategy Nash equilibriam, Change a single outcome so that B weakly
dominates A for player I.
Please Explain what the lines mean and explain each step
in how to do this problem!
1,1,4 II 2,2,2 -2,-2,-2 3,2,0 5,-1,4 0,0,0 a) Put the given game in strategic form. b) Find all pure strategy Nash equilibria. c) Change a single outcome so that B weakly dominates A for player I
answer parts e f g pls
4. Consider the following game presented in the strategic form: A B C W X Y Z 8,9 14,9 5,0 1,4 8,0 19,13 7,18 9.16 9,80 33, 335, 130, 84 (a) What is the relationship between an equilibrium concept and predic- tions regarding the outcome of a game? (b) Find all the Nash equilibrium strategy combinations. For each equilib- rium, discuss whether it is or it is not strong dominant strategy equi- librium. (c)...