Question

What is the difference between normal aging and pathological aging? Select one biological internal system and briefly discuss normal structural and functional changes that occur with age. What are diseases or malfunctions that can increase the aging process? How can the aging of these systems be slowed? How does aging affect a person’s sensory organs? How can this change affect the quality of life of older adults? What measures can be taken to mediate the effect of age-related loss and improve the quality of life? Active Life expectancy is defined as "The measure of the number of years a person can expect to live without a disability." Men have an active life expectancy of 60 years, and women have an active live expectancy of 58. What do you think people can do to improve their active life expectancy? Be specific in your answer. You should include answers to this question presented in Chapters 6 and 7 (optimal aging) as well as your ideas.

https://youtu.be/fF3_LjuMTMc

https://ebookcentral.proquest.com.ezproxy.umuc.edu/lib/umuc/reader.action?docID=996747&ppg=137

http://ocw.jhsph.edu/courses/AgingPopulations/PDFs/Lecture4.pdf

Answer 1

Ans.) To explain the difference between normal aging and pathological aging, here I provide example of human brain. Normal aging is getting old with time but pathological aging is aging of brain due to neuro-degenerative disorders.

Signs of memory loss in old age - normal and pathological are unmistakably attached both to biological and to natural components. Age-related memory changes occur both in basic structure and function of brain with declining proficiency of frontal and average transient locales being especially relevant.

The ex of synaptic loss is an appealing one when seen in a life expectancy viewpoint; babies lose gigantic quantities of neural connections as a feature of typical improvement; be that as it may, this chiseling of educated practices through procedures of pruning is altogether positive and versatile, looked at with synaptic loss in maturing, which is increasingly much the same as disintegration.

Along these lines the equivalent natural process can obviously have diverse capacities and outcomes at various life stages. Other brain related components incorporate declining forces to tie new data to previous information structures. At a more general dimension, this diminished effectiveness is viewed as associative deficit in older adults, who can recall single object of statistics yet experience issues relating names to faces, or gained data to its particular setting of occurrence. Older individuals additionally have issues encoding information particularly, which would regularly take into consideration less demanding later recovery.