Critically discuss whether you would agree with the following statements:
i. Banks use credit derivatives more for credit risk management
than trading
activities.
ii. “AIG’s collapse was caused largely by its $527 billion
portfolio of credit default
swaps (CDSs)…” (Sjostrom, 2009, p. 945).
1. This statement is correct. The downside of Trading activity is that id adds risk at times. However, banks use credit derivatives to transfer part or whole of its credit risk arising from loans lent to another party. Thus, Credit derivatives are tools enable banks to handle the avenue of credit risks more efficiently than Trading activities.
2. The statement is correct. AIG collapsed largely due to the Credit Default Swaps which amounted to about $ 526 bn. These CDS are credit derivatives widely used by Financial Institutions which remain unknown to the public. AIG issued CDS securities to banks and other institutions against the bonds which were then defaulted. Thus AIG remained with practically no money to repay ending up into major fall down.
Critically discuss whether you would agree with the following statements: i. Banks use credit derivatives more...
Part I. Statements (30%)
State whether you agree or disagree with the statements.
Provide argumentation or description for each statement.
1. Tax accounting is more conservative toward financial
accounting.
2. Information concerning tax in the financial statements is
not too relevant for the
investors, but only for a government.
3. IFAS 34 basic principle is that the company needs to wait
until the condition is certain
until it can record the tax transactions.
Part II. Cases (70%)
ThecaseI–30%
PT R...
Read the attached article. Do you feel one style of banking
control is more stable than the other? Why? Does one banking method
minimize market volatility and risk better or is it just packaged
differently? Do you feel the US (Western) Banking system can better
control the patterns of behavior going forward that have caused
economic damage in the past? Should the Fed continue its stimulus
policy, reduce it or abandon it entirely (Google some recent
articles to research this)? (Please...
1) Discuss the company's top risks? 2) Discuss whether the company treats risk reactively or proactively? 3) Do you observe a lack of understanding of potential exposures? 4) Does the company focus on internal risks or external risks? 5) Do you think the company is well prepared to respond to potential risks? Orange County he t die Following the debocie Orange County o dmorych of control procedures and financial gove nonce and d e setof o n policies December 1994...
JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (Dollars and Shares in Millions Except Per Share Amounts) (Note 1)* 2016 71,890 21,789 50.101 20,067 9.143 29 Sales to customers Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling, marketing and administrative expenses Research and development expense In-process research and development Interest income Interest expense, net of portion capitalized (Note 4) Other (income) expense, net Restructuring (Note 22) Eamings before provision for taxes on income Provision for taxes on income (Note 8)...
JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (Dollars and Shares in Millions Except Per Share Amounts) (Note 1)* 2016 71,890 21,789 50.101 20,067 9.143 29 Sales to customers Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling, marketing and administrative expenses Research and development expense In-process research and development Interest income Interest expense, net of portion capitalized (Note 4) Other (income) expense, net Restructuring (Note 22) Eamings before provision for taxes on income Provision for taxes on income (Note 8)...
JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (Dollars and Shares in Millions Except Per Share Amounts) (Note 1)* 2016 71,890 21,789 50.101 20,067 9.143 29 Sales to customers Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling, marketing and administrative expenses Research and development expense In-process research and development Interest income Interest expense, net of portion capitalized (Note 4) Other (income) expense, net Restructuring (Note 22) Eamings before provision for taxes on income Provision for taxes on income (Note 8)...
JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (Dollars and Shares in Millions Except Per Share Amounts) (Note 1)* 2016 71,890 21,789 50.101 20,067 9.143 29 Sales to customers Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling, marketing and administrative expenses Research and development expense In-process research and development Interest income Interest expense, net of portion capitalized (Note 4) Other (income) expense, net Restructuring (Note 22) Eamings before provision for taxes on income Provision for taxes on income (Note 8)...
JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (Dollars and Shares in Millions Except Per Share Amounts) (Note 1)* 2016 71,890 21,789 50.101 20,067 9.143 29 Sales to customers Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling, marketing and administrative expenses Research and development expense In-process research and development Interest income Interest expense, net of portion capitalized (Note 4) Other (income) expense, net Restructuring (Note 22) Eamings before provision for taxes on income Provision for taxes on income (Note 8)...
Respond to the following prompt with your original
thoughts, at least 200 words, utilize academic sources to support
your point.
Is the WACC an estimation of the real cost of capital(explicit
cost of money) or an opportunity cost tied to a particular decision
based on market required returns? You use the following points to
discuss this question or utilize your own points.
1. Projects of different levels of risk should have different
associated discount rates.
2. The WACC reflects the...
Case: Enron: Questionable Accounting Leads to CollapseIntroductionOnce upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant “E,” slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm laid off 4,000...