In 2010, U.S. output = $14.7 billion
Chinese output = $5.8 trillion
Growth of Chinese output = 10.5% per year
Growth of US output = 2.6% per year
I am giving you an example to calculate growth rate of US economy in 2011. As in 2010, the output level is $14.7 and grows at 2.6% per year. It makes the level of output in 2011 = 14.7 * 1.026 = $15.08
Year | US output (in trillion) (growing at 2.6% per year) | Chinese output (in trillion) (growing at 10.5% per year) |
2010 | 14.70 | 5.80 |
2011 | 15.08 | 6.41 |
2012 | 15.47 | 7.08 |
2013 | 15.88 | 7.83 |
2014 | 16.29 | 8.65 |
2015 | 16.71 | 9.56 |
2016 | 17.15 | 10.56 |
2017 | 17.59 | 11.67 |
2018 | 18.05 | 12.89 |
2019 | 18.52 | 14.25 |
2020 | 19.00 | 15.74 |
2021 | 19.50 | 17.39 |
2022 | 20.00 | 19.22 |
2023 | 20.52 | 21.24 |
2024 | 21.06 | 23.47 |
2025 | 21.60 | 25.93 |
2026 | 22.17 | 28.66 |
2027 | 22.74 | 31.67 |
2028 | 23.33 | 34.99 |
2029 | 23.94 | 38.66 |
2030 | 24.56 | 42.72 |
2031 | 25.20 | 47.21 |
2032 | 25.86 | 52.17 |
2033 | 26.53 | 57.64 |
2034 | 27.22 | 63.70 |
2035 | 27.93 | 70.39 |
2036 | 28.65 | 77.78 |
2037 | 29.40 | 85.94 |
2038 | 30.16 | 94.97 |
2039 | 30.95 | 104.94 |
2040 | 31.75 | 115.96 |
2041 | 32.58 | 128.13 |
2042 | 33.42 | 141.59 |
2043 | 34.29 | 156.45 |
2044 | 35.18 | 172.88 |
2045 | 36.10 | 191.03 |
2046 | 37.04 | 211.09 |
2047 | 38.00 | 233.26 |
2048 | 38.99 | 257.75 |
2049 | 40.00 | 284.81 |
2050 | 41.04 | 314.72 |
2051 | 42.11 | 347.76 |
2052 | 43.20 | 384.28 |
2053 | 44.33 | 424.63 |
2054 | 45.48 | 469.21 |
2055 | 46.66 | 518.48 |
2056 | 47.87 | 572.92 |
2057 | 49.12 | 633.07 |
2058 | 50.40 | 699.55 |
2059 | 51.71 | 773.00 |
2060 | 53.05 | 854.17 |
2061 | 54.43 | 943.85 |
2062 | 55.84 | 1042.96 |
2063 | 57.30 | 1152.47 |
2064 | 58.79 | 1273.48 |
2065 | 60.31 | 1407.19 |
2066 | 61.88 | 1554.95 |
2067 | 63.49 | 1718.22 |
2068 | 65.14 | 1898.63 |
2069 | 66.84 | 2097.99 |
2070 | 68.57 | 2318.27 |
2071 | 70.36 | 2561.69 |
2072 | 72.19 | 2830.67 |
2073 | 74.06 | 3127.89 |
2074 | 75.99 | 3456.32 |
2075 | 77.96 | 3819.23 |
2076 | 79.99 | 4220.25 |
2077 | 82.07 | 4663.38 |
2078 | 84.20 | 5153.03 |
2079 | 86.39 | 5694.10 |
2080 | 88.64 | 6291.98 |
2081 | 90.95 | 6952.64 |
2082 | 93.31 | 7682.67 |
2083 | 95.74 | 8489.35 |
2084 | 98.22 | 9380.73 |
2085 | 100.78 | 10365.71 |
2086 | 103.40 | 11454.10 |
2087 | 106.09 | 12656.78 |
2088 | 108.85 | 13985.75 |
2089 | 111.68 | 15454.25 |
2090 | 114.58 | 17076.95 |
2091 | 117.56 | 18870.03 |
2092 | 120.61 | 20851.38 |
2093 | 123.75 | 23040.77 |
2094 | 126.97 | 25460.06 |
2095 | 130.27 | 28133.36 |
2096 | 133.66 | 31087.36 |
2097 | 137.13 | 34351.54 |
2098 | 140.70 | 37958.45 |
2099 | 144.36 | 41944.09 |
2100 | 148.11 | 46348.22 |
2101 | 151.96 | 51214.78 |
2102 | 155.91 | 56592.33 |
2103 | 159.96 | 62534.52 |
2104 | 164.12 | 69100.65 |
2105 | 168.39 | 76356.22 |
2106 | 172.77 | 84373.62 |
2107 | 177.26 | 93232.85 |
2108 | 181.87 | 103022.30 |
2109 | 186.60 | 113839.64 |
2110 | 191.45 | 125792.80 |
As per the data, China will surpass the US economy in 2024.
Level of US output in 20 years will be $24.56 trillion
Level of Chinese output in 20 years will be $115.96 trillion
Chinese economic growth is the outstanding feature of the world economic scene over the past two...
Chinese economic growth is the outstanding feature of the world economic scene over the past two decades. a. In 2014, U.S. output was $17.4 trillion, and Chinese output was $10.4 trillion. Suppose that from now on, the output of China grows at an annual rate of 6.5% per year, whereas the output of the United States grows at an annual rate of 2.2% per year. These are the values in each country for the period 2010–2014 as stated in the...
1. Why do you think that the Chinese historically pegged the value of the yuan to the U.S. dollar? 2. Why did the Chinese move to a managed-float system in 2005? 3. What are the benefits that China might gain by allowing the yuan to float freely against other major currencies such as the U.S. dollar and the euro? What are the risks? What do you think they should do? 4. Is there any evidence that the Chinese kept the...
Is economic growth in the developing world related to growth in the industrialized? countries? The output of a regression analysis that related growth? (in % of Gross Domestic? Product) of the developing countries to the growth of developed countries from 1970 to 2007 is given below. Complete parts a through f. LOADING... Click the icon to view the regression analysis. ? Dependent? variable: Growth Developing Countries Rsquared2equals=20.8320.83?% Variable Coefficient Intercept 3.593.59 Growth Developed Countries 0.405 a) Write the equation of...
Case assignments must be completed with a written 2-page study on the assigned case questions in the textbook. The format requested for these assignments is based on elaborating and including two basic parts in the essay: 1) in a bullet presentation style (one phrase each bullet), list a summary of the key issues, situations, problems, opportunities and threats you may identify as relevant; 2) answer all the questions listed in each case in two or three sound paragraphs. Use the...
Is there one universal way for a MNC to motivate its employees around the world to exert maximum effort and be accountable for their results? case: Global Talent Management at Novartis I do not know how to give you the whole case Sourcing Talent Globally The company was actively involved in sourcing talent from increasingly dispersed locations. Managers were encouraged to keep an updated list of leadership talent. In addition, the company 7 708-486 Global Talent Management at Novartis had...
can someone please help me with an introduction paragraph and a summary of the whole article. us. Trump Didn't Kill the Global Trade System. He Split It in Two. Allies find relations modestly tweaked despite the president's rhetoric, while relations with China are entering a deep freeze By Greg Ip Dec. 26, 2018 1136 am. ET When Donald Trump entered the White House on a platform of defiant nationalism nearly two years ago, many feared he would dismantle the global...
Barnacle Industries was awarded a patent over 15 years ago for a unique industrial strength cleaner that removes barnacles and other particles from the hulls of ships. Thanks to its monopoly position, Barnacle has earned more than $160 million over the past decade. Its customers—spanning the gamut from cruise lines to freighters—use the product because it reduces their fuel bills. The annual (inverse) demand function for Barnacle’s product is given by P = 500 -0.001Q, and Barnacle’s cost function is...
Barnacle Industries was awarded a patent over 15 years ago for a unique industrial strength cleaner that removes barnacles and other particles from the hulls of ships. Thanks to its monopoly position, Barnacle has earned more than $160 million over the past decade. Its customers—spanning the gamut from cruise lines to freighters—use the product because it reduces their fuel bills. The annual (inverse) demand function for Barnacle’s product is given by P = 480 -0.00006Q, and Barnacle’s cost function is...
Read the attached article. Do you feel one style of banking control is more stable than the other? Why? Does one banking method minimize market volatility and risk better or is it just packaged differently? Do you feel the US (Western) Banking system can better control the patterns of behavior going forward that have caused economic damage in the past? Should the Fed continue its stimulus policy, reduce it or abandon it entirely (Google some recent articles to research this)? (Please...
On page 334-335 there is a feature entitled - Institutions in Action. Why Did Asia Industrialize Faster than Latin America?] Page 335 of the feature has three questions, you can to respond to any one of the three but please pick just one. It should be about one page long Cite two source. UN HD INSTITUTIONS IN ACTION Why Did Asia Industrialize Faster than Latin America? ecades on the produd middle The rise of Asia over the past four decades...